SITE MANAGEMENT

(SOW Section C.2)

OBJECTIVE

MEASURES

EXPECTATIONS

LEVEL

SM1. Develop an integrated technical, schedule, and cost baseline for the Hanford Site. (See SOW Section C.2.A)

Percent of fee pool = 5%

SM1.1 Integrated technical basis, cost estimates, and schedules for work required to achieve Hanford strategies in a manner to enable timely acceptance, validation, and work authorization by DOE.

SM1.1.1 Integrated Site baseline with supporting work plans, including input of other prime contractors, submitted not later than July 31, 1997.

SM2. Provide a high level integrated sitewide systems engineering process and products.

Percent of fee pool = 3%

SM2.1 Maintain and improve an iterative process to ensure a consistent set of top-down integrated systems engineering documents.

SM2.1.1 Provide integrated Sitewide systems engineering database capabilities by July 31, 1997.

SM2.1.2 A Systems Engineering Management Plan submitted to RL by Oct. 1, 1996.

SM2.1.3 Demonstration of systems engineering products with configuration management at the sitewide level by July 31, 1997.

SM2.1.3.1 Positive: By May 1, 1997

$100,000

SM2.2 Improvement of sitewide systems engineering product quality and reliability.

SM2.2.1 A minimum of 90% of the sitewide systems engineering database is accurate; with inconsistencies, omissions, and errors identified and critical issues identified and being tracked in the sitewide systems engineering resolutions process by July 31, 1997.

SM2.2.1.1 Positive: 98% accuracy by July 1, 1997

$100,000

SM2.3 Subcontractors apply systems engineering principles as appropriate for their scope of work with integration to the sitewide systems engineering program.

SM2.3.1 Demonstrate clear linkage of data integration for sitewide systems engineering database with configuration management from subcontractors to the PHMC and from the PHMC into subcontractor requirements and work plans by July 31, 1997.

SM2.3.1.1 Positive: by May 1, 1997

$100,000

SM3 Integrated management systems maintain the Hanford Site managerially in control. (See SOW Section C.2.B)

Percent of fee pool = 2%

SM3.1 Manage and integrate Hanford Site activities in a timely manner.

SM3.1.1 Deliver a Management & Integration Plan for DOE by October 1, 1996, except for the following sub- plan:

- Risk Management Plan: due

January 31, 1997

SM3.2 Policies and procedures promote efficient and effective management of contract responsibilities.

SM3.2.1 Implement policies and procedures in accordance with the approved Management & Integration Plan by March 31, 1997.

SM3.3 Automated management information system(s) ensure accessible, timely, accurate, useful, and reliable technical, budget, schedule, financial, performance (all aspects including safety), baseline control information, while continuing to provide timely and accurate support to DOE decision-making process in the interim.

SM3.3.1 Management information system(s) provide accurate and timely decision-making capabilities to DOE. Successfully demonstrate system, including linkage capability to DOE-HQ reporting systems by July 31, 1997.

SM3.4 Benchmarking substantiates contractors' performance.

SM3.4.1 Benchmarking plan including appropriate cost and performance measures and ratios submitted by July 31, 1997, so that benchmarking substantiates high performance (by both PHMC and Major Subcontractors) against other private and public companies.

SM3.4.2. Benchmarking implemented within 30 days after DOE-RL approval.

SM3.6 Personnel assets closely aligned to needs dictated by authorized workscope. PHMC and Major Subcontractors staffed "for the valleys" with "peaks" handled by subcontract.

SM3.6.1 Submit preliminary, draft staffing forecast to DOE by November 1, 1996.

Submit draft staffing forecast to DOE by December 15, 1996.

SM3.6.2 Submit final staffing analysis to DOE by January 31, 1997.

SM4 Integrated financial systems maintain the Hanford site financially in control.

Percent of fee pool = 2%

SM4.1 Efficient, effective financial systems provide useful, accurate and timely financial information, compliant with rules and regulations such as DOE orders, Cost Accounting Standards, and generally accepted Accounting Standards.

SM4.1.1 Develop a successful cost reporting system capable of reporting by WBS, including both functional and programmatic areas by December 31, 1996.

SM4.1.2 Contractor's financial systems successfully undergo a DOE-RL Office of Chief Financial Officer review and approval process with no material exceptions by July 31, 1997.

SM4.1.3 Invoices are generated from an accounting system approved by DOE-RL and are timely, with an error rate less than 3%.

SM4.1.4 Monthly letter of credit

reconciliation report of costs incurred and invoiced for the month (with draw downs or checks paid) is timely submitted and has an error rate < 3%.

SM4.1.5 Disclosure statement(s) reflecting actual practices and fully compliant with Cost Accounting Standards are submitted by October 1, 1996 and annually thereafter.

SM4.2 Administrative control of funds processes are implemented and uncosted balances are minimized.

SM4.2.1 Interim administrative control of funds system and procedures are in place and approved by RL by October 1, 1996.

SM4.2.2 All necessary personnel have been trained by December 1, 1996.

SM4.2.3 No funds ceilings are exceeded in FY 1997.

SM4.2.4 On September 30, 1997, uncosted balances are within 2% and "below" the HQ-EM standard percent guidelines.

SM4.3 An effective internal audit capability reviews contractor financial activities and those of its major subcontractors.

SM4.3.1 Successful implementation of the requirements of the Internal Audit Clause as required by DOE Acquisition Letter 90-3R.

SM4.4 Acceptable forward pricing rates allow for timely completion of the Activity Data Sheet budget formulation process.

SM4.4.1 Forward pricing rates must be received by RL by December 15, 1996, and annually thereafter.

SM4.5 Provide acceptable funding execution rates for timely completion of the Fiscal Year Work Plans.

SM4.5.1 Funding execution rates must be received by RL by June 15, 1997, and annually thereafter.

SM4.6F Implement recommended indirect reductions identified by analysis performed in FY96 or provide RL with acceptable justification for not implementing.

SM4.6.1 Successful completion will occur if by September 30, 1997, all reductions are either implemented or waived by RL, based on a justification from the contractor.

SM5 ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY AND HEALTH. Manage and integrate ESH&Q across the Hanford site.

Percent of fee pool = 4%

SM5.1 Develop and implement a DOE/RL approved ESH Management Plan, that includes implementation guidance for DNFSB Recommendation 95-2.

SM5.1.1 Submit plan to RL for approval by December 31, 1996.

SM5.1.2 Conduct self assessment of implementation within 6 months of implementation date.

SM5.2 Develop and implement a plan for conducting independent and self assessments.

SM5.2.1 Plan developed, submitted to RL-PAD and implemented by November 30, 1996.

SM5.3 Provide single point of contact interface(s) for DOE-RL for environmental and for safety and health matters.

SM5.3.1 Communications of environmental or safety and health direction and information between RL and contractor organizations passes through a single point of contact identified by October 1, 1996.

SM5.3.2 Contractor will provide a single point of contact for coordination & facilitation of all regulatory agency visits & inspections by October 1, 1996

SM5.4 Develop performance indicators for ES&H and Quality Assurance.

SM5.4.1 Submit proposed safety and health and quality assurance performance indicators to RL for approval by December 1, 1996.

Submit environmental performance indicators, as part of the Environmental Management System Implementation Plan (EMSIP) required by SM7.1.2, for RL approval by April 1, 1997.

SM5.4.2 Implement safety and health and quality assurance indicators by January 1, 1997 and establish baseline.

SM5.5 Develop and implement a single, sitewide, consolidated, automated deficiency management tracking, trending, and reporting system as part of a site-wide management system.

SM5.5.1 Complete system development by July 31, 1997.

SM5.6 Prevent inadvertent use of counterfeit parts.

SM5.6.1 Processes and controls are in place to provide confidence that suspect/counterfeit items will not be installed into Project Hanford facilities under the FDH contract.

SM5.7 * Program developed for obtaining a VPP Star Status at Project Hanford.

Percent of fee pool = 1%

SM5.7.1* By December 31, 1996, all Major Subcontractors submit strategic plans for obtaining VPP Star Status.

SM5.7.2 * Major Subcontractors will submit application of VPP Star Status in FY98 with the one year required implementation beginning in FY97.

SM5.8 * Control chemical purchase and subsequent use to minimize hazardous waste generation.

SM5.8.1 * Evaluate existing chemical tracking database for completeness of hazardous chemicals by March  31, 1997.

SM5.8.2 * Upgrade existing database for appropriate chemical purchasing by September 30, 1997.

SM6 ENVIRONMENT, SAFTEY, AND HEALTH. Achieve high performance in S&H across the site.

Percent of fee pool 2%

SM6.1 Manage and integrate the site Emergency Preparedness program.

SM6.1.1 Implement the existing Site Emergency Response Organization Re-engineering Project Plan by July 1, 1997.

SM6.2 Annually, prepare, conduct, and critique one tabletop exercise, one field full-participation exercise and one radiological assistance program (RAP) exercise.

SM6.2.1 Complete tabletop, field, and RAP exercises by September 30, 1997.

SM6.3 Manage fire protection programs to minimize the consequences of fire on the site. Develop plan to implement the fire department baseline needs assessment.

SM6.3.1 Submit implementation plan for DOE-RL approval by January 1, 1997.

SM6.4 Complete fire hazards analyses and fire protection shutdown plans.

SM6.4.1 By September 30, 1997, complete FHAs for existing nuclear facilities.

SM6.4.2 Complete Fire Protection Shutdown Plans for each facility to support scheduled shutdown of fire protection features.

SM6.5 Reduce site property fire loss rates.

SM6.5.1 FY-97 fire loss rates shall not exceed 80% of the RL 5 yr average fire property loss rate.

SM6.6 Continue implementation of the Occupational Health Process.

M6.6.1 Submit plan for transferring workplace hazard and worker-at-risk data from PHMC to the site occupational medical contractor (SOMC) for DOE-RL approval by December 31, 1996.

SM6.6.2 Complete implementation of the Occupational Health Process by June 30, 1997.

SM6.7 Develop coordinated business plan between the PHMC and the site occupational medical contractor.

SM6.7.1 Business plan approved by PHMC and SOMC by December 31, 1996.

SM6.8 Complete development and implement the Radiological Controls Improvement Program .

SM6.8.1 Program plan will be submitted by March  31, 1997.

SM6.8.2 Program improvements implemented in accordance with DOE approved schedule in Plan.

SM6.9 * Reduce injury/illness rates sitewide.

SM6.9.1 * Reduce sitewide injury cost index to 8 or less during FY97.

SM6.10 * Reduce radiation exposures sitewide

SM6.10.1 * Reduce annual radiation exposure to workers by better than 25% of the FY96 level in FY97 (normalized for increased work in radiation areas).

SM7 ENVIRONMENT, SAFTEY, AND HEALTH. Achieve high performance in enviromental stewardship at Hanford Site.

Percent of fee pool = 2%

SM7.1 Implementation of an Environmental Management System (EMS) consistent with the principles of ISO 14000.

SM7.1.1 The Contractor senior management will provide written commitments to conduct business in a manner consistent with ISO 14000 Environmental Management System concepts by October 1, 1996.

SM7.1.2 Develop and submit for RL approval, an Environmental Management System Implementation Plan (EMSIP) by April  1, 1997.

SM7.1.3 The Environmental Management System Implementation Plan will be implemented in accordance with the schedule in the Plan.

SM7.1.4 Compliance with EMS concepts will be demonstrated through the Contractor's self-assessment program by January 1, 1998.

(Not applicable in fiscal year l997)

SM7.2 Manage & integrate a technically competent, multi-media (with the exception of groundwater) ambient environmental monitoring program, in an efficient, cost effective manner.

SM7.2.1 Submit for RL approval a plan and recommendations for integration of required environmental monitoring by April  1, 1997.

SM7.3 Deliver to RL for timely submittal to the regulatory agencies, clearly written, complete reports meeting the requirements defined by the regulatory agencies or DOE-HQ.

SM7.3.1 At least 14 days before they are due to the regulatory agencies, the contractor will provide complete, final drafts of all routine or scheduled environmental reports required by regulatory agencies or DOE-HQ.

SM7.4 * Implement an effective environmental protection program that prevents occurrences.

SM7.4.1 * Establish an environmental occurrence reporting program.

SM8 KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL. Provide a stable management group.

* (Negative incentive only)

SM8.1 Contractor and Major Subcontractor management key personnel remain in their proposed positions long enough to effect change to the Hanford way of doing business.

SM8.1.1 Individuals named as key management personnel in this contract (both Prime and Major Subcontractor) shall not be moved without DOE approval by the Contractor to another Contractor activity or position before September 30, 1997.

SM8.1.1.1. Negative: For each key management person who does not remain through September 30, 1997, the total fee earned will be reduced by $50,000 per person up to a maximum of $300,000.

SM9 HUMAN RESOURCES. Human Resources Programs provide a workplace environment conducive to employee well-being and growth; provide innovative compensation practices & personnel initiatives, aligned with the commercial marketplace; and attract and retain a diverse, well-trained work force capable of successfully executing Hanford's mission.

SM9.1 Employee labor cost factor = (salary + benefits)/(# of employees)

SM9.1.1 Maintain employee labor costs factor less than or equal to end of FY96 levels.

SM9.2 Health care factor = (Health care program costs)/(number of covered employees)

SM9.2.1 Achieve 15% decrease in Health care factor in FY97 from the FY96 factor.

SM9.3 Retirees benefit factor = (retirees benefit costs)/(number of covered employees)

SM9.3.1 Achieve 5% decrease in retiree benefit costs factor FY97 from the FY96 factor.

SM9.4 Workforce planning factor = actual end of year work force profile by Common Occupational Classification System family (COCS) vs projected end-of-year work force profile by COCS family

SM9.4.1 Workforce profile accuracy of greater than 90% by COCS family.

(not applicable in FY97)

SM9.5 Workforce placement factor =

(# internal hires)/(total # of hires)

SM9.5.1 Fill 50% of posted/ advertised/ established vacancies filled through internal placement.

SM9.6 Labor relations assessment factor = (number of initiatives implemented through partnership with labor)/(total number of initiatives)

SM9.6.1 Implement 90% of labor/ management partnership initiatives agreed to by the parties during the year (period).

SM9.7 Cultural and work place effectiveness assessment results at the beginning and end of the rating period.

SM9.7.1 Conduct an initial human capital effectiveness assessment during the third quarter of FY97.

SM9.7.2 Develop/implement strategies and programs to address recommendations made in the baseline assessment. (SM9.7.1)

SM9.8 Completion of Affirmative Action Plan goals.

SM9.8.1 By the end of the 1997 plan year, achieve 80% of the action oriented diversity commitments established in the Affirmative Action Plan (AAP).

SM9.8.2 Maintain beginning of FY97 percent of protected classes (PC) within each EEO-1 category by the end of that calendar year (adjusted for voluntary separations).

SM9.9 Timely EEO complaints processing.

SM9.9.1 Process 100% of EEO complaints within legally mandated time.

SM9.10 Reduce business & training travel cost.

SM9.10.1 Achieve a 15% reduction in business & training travel cost over FY96 travel cost.

(not applicable in FY97)

SM10 LITIGATION MANAGEMENT. Manage litigation and the use of in-house and outside counsel to achieve cost-effective high-quality results.

SM10.1 Effective use made of in-house and outside counsel to achieve high-quality legal representation and results.

SM10.1.1 Develop and submit Litigation Management Plan for DOE-RL approval by October 1, 1996.

SM10.1.2 Implement Litigation Management Plan (Procedures) within 15 days of DOE approval.

SM10.1.3 Provide FY97 litigation budget for all litigation by November 30, 1996.

SM10.1.4 Provide DOE with a litigation status and budget and status report within 10 days of the end of each quarter.

SM10.1.5 Submit reviewed and Contractor-approved outside counsel bills to DOE on a monthly basis.

SM10.1.6 Conduct analysis of litigation action and costs and lessons learned to determine how to better manage other/future cases. Provide analysis to DOE within 60 days after completion of each case.

SM11 TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT PROJECT. Demonstrate and implement innovative technologies to meet identified site needs and schedule commitments. Integrate technological advancements into baselines. Eliminate redundancies of technology efforts.

SM11.1 Technology needs related to the Hanford sitewide baseline.

SM11.1.1 Identify, prioritize, and submit to the Hanford Site Technology Coordination Group, technology needs related to the sitewide baseline, the site support baseline, and management processes, including the process for finding technologies to meet those needs, by September 30, 1997.

SM11.1.2 Number of innovative technologies deployed that meet site needs.

SM11.2 Innovative technologies demonstrated to meet Site needs.

SM11.2.1 Number of innovative technologies demonstrations completed that meet identified site needs.

SM11.3 Amount of funds leveraged from the current baseline between the site programs and other technology programs or providers.

SM11.3.1 Percent increase in FY97 leveraged funds from the current baseline

SM12 INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION. Operate a centralized computer network and telephone service in a cost effective manner.

SM12.1 Information resource management planning.

SM12.1.1 Submit an Information Resource Management (IRM) Plan by March  31, 1997.

SM12.2 Information Resource Management (IRM) Support Services

SM12.2.1 IRM support services are tied to mission requirements by September 30, 1997.

SM13 SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY. Manage, operate, and integrate activities in a cost-effective manner, based on risk assessments, to ensure adequate protection of site safeguards and security interests.

SM13.1 Nuclear Material Safeguards System (NMSS) in place.

SM13.1.1 Nuclear Material Safeguards System (NMSS) equipment installed, tested, training complete, and ready for beneficial use by May 31, 1997.

SM13.2 Vulnerability Assessments (VAs) completed

SM13.2.1 Conduct VAs in a quality manner on schedule provided by DOE-RL.

SM13.3 Personnel Security actions completed

SM13.3.1 Provide clearance justification within 5 working days and terminations within 2 working days.

SM14 SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY. Complete the declassification review of documents as defined in the Hanford Declassification Program and as requested by DOE.

SM14.1 Classified documents reviewed for declassification, maintained, and data entered into DDTS, entered on the Internet, and reported to DOE-RL.

SM14.1.1 Complete the declassification review of 120,000 pages of previously unreviewed classified National Security Information (NSI) and Restricted Data by September 30, 1997.

SM14.2 Error rate of declassifications.

SM14.2.1 Achieve a maximum error rate of no more than one error per hundred pages reviewed.

SM15 EXTERNAL/INTERNAL COMMUNICATIONS. Ensure that the full range of external and internal stakeholders and customers receive information in a timely, accurate, complete, and business-like manner. Provide appropriate opportunities for stakeholder and customer involvement in the Hanford decision-making process. Ensure that mandated requirements of the Freedom of Information Act, Privacy Act, and Federal Advisory Committee Act are met.

SM15.1 Integrated Hanford Communications and Public Involvement Plan, including providing support for the Indian Nations Program, and Congressional and Intergovernmental Relations.

SM15.1.1 Submit to DOE an Integrated Hanford Communications Plan incorporating external/internal communications activities, stakeholder involvement activities, and Intergovernmental liaison activities to the DOE Office of External Affairs, by March  31, 1997.

SM16 TRAINING. Maintain a qualified and technically competent workforce.

SM16.1 Training and Qualification is implemented by a DOE-RL approved Site Qualification and Training Plan developed from Guidelines of the DOE STD Systematic Approach to Training and the DOE Implementation Plan for DNFSB Recommendation 93-3.

SM16.1.1 Submit a Site Qualification and Training Plan for DOE approval by December 1, 1996.

SM16.2 Implementation Plan for DNFSB Recommendation 93-3 commitments completed as Training Implementation Plans.

SM16.2.1 All scheduled FY 97 commitments in the plan to be completed by September 30, 1997.

SM16.2.1.1*POSITIVE: All commitments in the plan to be completed by March  31, 1997. $25,000

SM16.3 Number of partnered college/ university courses developed and accredited.

SM16.3.1 Total PHMC cost for training will not exceed the FY96 Baseline.

SM16.4 Elimination of redundant training courses.

SM16.4.1 98% of all courses taught at the Hanford Site are nonredundent by September 30, 1997.

SM16.5 Course materials reflect incorporation of lessons learned from field activities.

SM16.5.1 Quarterly review samples of PHMC course materials show incorporation of appropriate lessons learned information from this and other field activities. PHMC is defined as Fluor Daniel Hanford, Babcok & Wilcox, Duke Enginereing & Services Hanford, Lockheed Martin Hanford, Numatec Hanford, Rust Federal Services of Hanford, and DynCorp Hanford.

SM16.6 Percentage of automated training records integrated into the human resources "People Soft" System.

SM16.6.1 All PHMC training records of individuals are input and operational in "People-Soft" by September 30, 1997 PHMC is defined as Fluor Daniel Hanford, Babcok & Wilcox, Duke Enginereing & Services Hanford, Lockheed Martin Hanford, Numatec Hanford, Rust Federal Services of Hanford, and DynCorp Hanford.

SM 17 TRAINING. Assess training needs and resources and provide DOE with a detailed strategy for coordinated market-driven training unit.

SM17.1 One point-of-contact to meet all training customer needs.

SM17.1.1 Provide a plan to eliminate redundant functions and evaluate consolidation of training under one organization by March  31, 1997.

SM18 TRAINING. Operate and maintain the QTRC as a "market-driven" training resource.

SM18.1 Perception of training quality by customers.

SM18.1.1 Demonstrate customer perception of training quality through greater student/management satisfaction indicated by responses to course surveys in FY97 vs. FY96.

SM18.2 Benchmarking studies conducted to assess training course cost, content, and quality.

SM18.2.1 Conduct benchmarking studies for five important courses as agreed upon by OTR. QTRC courses compare favorably with high-performance training benchmarks in the area of cost, content and quality.

SM18.3 QTRC becomes self supporting resource.

SM18.3.1 QTRC becomes a self-supporting resource in which costs are liquidated by tuition.

SM19 TRAINING Construct, support, and maintain the HAMMER Center in accordance with the HAMMER Mission and Business Plan.

SM19.1 Complete construction activities on the HAMMER Training Center project and begin operation of the new HAMMER Training Center

SM19.1.1 Complete construction activities on the HAMMER Training Center project by June 30, 1997.

SM19.1.2 Assemble a highly qualified team to maintain the HAMMER Training Center and to provide operations and administrative support by June 30, 1997 for administration, operation and maintenance of the HAMMER Program and Training Center

SM19.1.3 Begin operation of the new HAMMER Training Center by September 30, 1997.

SM19.1.4 Establish and implement a brokering process to utilize "best-in-class" training providers on an

as-needed basis by June 1, 1997.

SM19.1.5 Evaluate the use of an information management system based on PeopleSoft software, which integrates all HAMMER business management activities; e.g. financial, procurement, training scheduling, registration, records management, etc.

SM19.2 Provide support for the ongoing HAMMER Training and Program activities to assure smooth successful transition to the permanent HAMMER Training Center.

SM19.2.1 Support maintenance of the HAMMER National Partnership comprised of Labor, Fed/State/Local Governments, Tribal Leaders and Universities and Community Colleges (known and functioning as the HAMMER Steering Committee).

SM19.3 Implement a comprehensive HAMMER training evaluation program based on the Kirkpatrick Training Evaluation Model (Levels 1 through 4).

SM19.3.1 The evaluation program, Levels 1 through 3, will be completed. Level 4 will be designed by June 30, 1997 and be fully implemented by September 30, 1997.

SM19.4 Actively demonstrate steady progress toward creation and implementation of revenue flows (tuition, fees, grants) from HAMMER's Hanford and non-Hanford customers which offset operating costs .

SM19.4.1 In fiscal year 1998, revenues offset operating costs.

(not applicable in FY97)

SM20 ECONOMIC TRANSITION AND OUTSOURCING. Manage and implement economic transition and outsourcing that contributes to economic stabilization of the Tri-Cities area. Incorporate potential investment of corporate resources into the plan.

SM20.1 Economic transition and outsourcing plan

SM20.1.1 Develop and implement an Economic Transition and Outsourcing Plan by December 1, 1996.

SM21 Manage and implement potential investment of corporate resources into economic transition and outsourcing that contributes to economic stabilization and diversification of the Tri-Cities area.

SM21.1 * Development of jobs and investment opportunities in the local economy resulting from:

o Spin off companies

o Asset conversion

o Commercialized/acquired technologies

o Hanford facilities utilization

o Other

Amount of corporate fund PHMC invest or attract to the local economy supporting new jobs and businesses.

Development of an economic transition and outsourcing plan that will result in the creation of new jobs and business in the local economy.

SM21.1.1 * Invest $3M (Contractor and Major Subcontractors) to bring new jobs to the Tri-Cities by September 30, 1997.

Note: Negative incentive associated with this expectation is: $150,000

SM21.1.2. * Invest up to 12% of total fees earned through Project Hanford performance (here after referred to as total earned fee) to benefit the community by September 30, 1997.

Note: Negative incentive associated with this expectation is: $100,000

SM21.1.3 * Establish a $10M investment fund agreement (between Contractor and Major Subcontractors) for potential use by Columbia Basin Ventures (CBV) to support economic development of the Tri-City Area by November 1, 1996.

Note: Negative incentive associated with this expectation is: $200,000

SM21.1.4 * Outsource 2525 Project Hanford Staff on Day one (subject to DOE outsourcing approval).

SM21.1.5 * Provide funds from Project Hanford fees to help refurbish the WPPSS warehouse to house the Lockheed Martin-funded tank model in the Applied Process Engineering Laboratory by September 30, 1997.

Note: Negative incentive associated with this expectation is: $100,000

SM21.1.6 * Help create 200 new private sector jobs by September 30, 1997. (FDH and Major Subcontractors commit to help attract or develop new businesses, independent of Project Hanford, that will generate 3,000 jobs by the end of the 5 year contract.)

Note: Negative incentive associated with this expectation is: $100,000

SM21.1.7 * Of the total Project Hanford budget, 50% will be outsourced by 2001 to other than Major Subcontractors. (NA in FY97)

SM21.1.8 * Within 5 years, 60% of all outsourced Project Hanford dollars will be directed to local, regional, and Native American businesses. (NA in FY97)

SM21.1.9 * Transfer into FDNW non-current Hanford mission work equivalent to 50 new engineering and construction management professional positions by December 1, 1996 (subject to DOE outsourcing approval.)

Note: Negative incentive associated with this expectation is: $50,000

SM21.1.10 * Contractor shall provide a strategy on what contracting methodologies (subcontract or

as-needed service) are best for providing AE/Construction Management services by January 31, 1997.

TANK WASTE REMEDIATION SYSTEM (SOW Section C.3.A)
Go to Section C.3.A of the PHMC Contract

OBJECTIVE

MEASURE

EXPECTATION

LEVEL

TWR1 Resolve known tank safety issues.

Percent of fee pool = 5%

TWR1.1 Close Secretarial Safety Initiatives

TWR1.1.1 Complete Secretarial Safety Initiatives by September 30, 1997 as referenced in the Secretarial Safety Initiatives, 1994.

TWR1.2 Resolve Organic safety Issues

TWR1.2.1 Complete supporting technical document on the organic complexant and organic solvents safety issue by December  31, 1996.

TWR1.2.2 Complete installation of continuous temperature monitoring system on remaining organic tanks by September 30, 1997.

TWR1.3 Resolve flammable gas issues

TWR1.3.1 Complete retained gas sampling in Tanks: 101-AW, 103-AN, 104-AN, 105-AN, and 103-U, and provide recommendation for future deployments, by January 31, 1997.

TWR1.3.2 Submit Unreviewed Safety Question (USQ) Closure Package for Flammable Gas Justification for Continued Operations (JCO) Facility Group 3A Interim Stabilized Tanks by August 15, 1997.

TWR1.3.3 Complete and issue Safety Issue Resolution Strategy document by May 30, 1997.

TWR1.3.4 Complete and issue report on gas generation studies of single-shell tank waste by August 4, 1997.

TWR1.3.5 Complete installation of Standard Hydrogen Monitor Systems (SHMSs) on Additional Flammable Gas Tanks by September 30, 1997.

TWR1.3.6 Submit USQ Closure Package for Flammable Gas JCO Facility Group 3B Non-Interim Stabilized Tanks by September 30, 1997.

TWR1.3.7 Issue FY 1997 Annual Report on Vapor Space Monitoring of Flammable Gas Tanks by September 30, 1997.

TWR1.3.8 (SI-2L) Close SY Farm Flammable Gas USQ (T2B-95-105).

TWR1.4 Resolve High Heat tank safety issue.

TWR1.4.1 Verify that sufficient high-heat sludge has been removed from Tank 241-C-106 to eliminate the need for periodic water additions. Complete final technical documentation to resolve the High-Heat Safety Issue and submit to DOE-RL by September 30, 1997.

TWR2 Characterize Tank Waste

* Percent of Fee pool = 6%

TWR2.1 Characterize tank waste to support storage and retrieval.

TWR2.1.1 FY 1997 deliverables in support of completing Tank Waste Characterization Basis Sampling and Analysis DNFSB Recommendation 93-5 Implementation Plan, Revision 1, commitment 5.6.3.1.

TWR2.1.2 Issue 26 new tank characterization reports by September 30, 1997.

TWR3.* Be responsive to regulatory documentation requirements.

Percent of fee pool = 2%

TWR3.1.* Meet regulatory reporting requirements of tank characterization

TWR3.1.1 Update and reissue the 23 Tank Characterization Reports published in FY93 and FY94 by June 30, 1997.

TWR3.1.2b Update and reissue the Data Quality Objective (DQOs) documents for Waste Compatibility by June 30, 1997.

TWR4 Operate tank farms in such a manner as to ensure all activities comply with requirements.

* Percent of Fee pool = 5%

TWR4.1 Manage tank waste volume within the existing double-shell tank capacity.

TWR4.1.1 Stage waste to reduce waste volume by June 30, 1997.

TWR4.1.1a Complete evaporator campaigns 97-1 and 97-2 with waste volume reductions as identified in Process Control Plans.

TWR4.1.2 Update Final Safety Analysis Report for 242-A evaporator by March 31, 1997.

TWR4.1.3 Prepare and issue an Annual Operational Waste Volume Report by August 31, 1997.

TWR4.1.4 Install the new pump in Tank 104-AW by September 30, 1997.

TWR4.1.5 Install Tank Monitoring and Control System (TMACS) in the AW Tank Farm by September 30, 1997.

TWR4.1.6 Install the jumper manifold in the AW Tank Farm by July 31, 1997.

TWR4.1.7 Replace the 242-A Steam-driven fan with an electric driven unit by January 15, 1997.

TWR5 Transition Tank Farms to controlled, clean, and stable condition.

* Percent of fee pool = 6%

TWR5.1 Perform operations to assure transition to controlled clean and stable condition.

TWR5.1.1 Complete interim stabilization of an additional four tanks in the 200 West area by September 30, 1997.

TWR5.1.2 Initiate interim stabilization (salt-well pumping) on 2 tanks by March 31, 1997, and 6 additional tanks by September 30, 1997. (New TPA Milestones M-41-21 and M-41-22).

TWR5.1.3 Operate the mixer pump in Tank 101-SY to mitigate the flammable gas safety issue.

TWR5.1.4 Complete Phase 1 of the Terminal Clean-out (TCO) of 242-T Evaporator by September 30, 1997.

TWR5.1.5 Reduce the surface soil contamination by cleaning up an area of one million square feet by September 30, 1997.

TWR5.1.6 Achieve controlled, clean, and stable state for T, and B Tank Farms in accordance with applicable project plans by September 30, 1997.

TWR5.1.7 Maintain the capability to manage Double-Shell Tank space in West Tank Farm by ensuring at least one existing cross-site transfer system, from the 200 West Area to the 200 East Area, is leak tight (hydrostatically tested) through September 30, 1997.

TWR5.1.8 Support vadose zone characterization in S and SX tank farms by achieving the performance completion criteria by September 30, 1997.

TWR5.2 Complete design and construction activities required for transition to controlled, clean, and stable condition.

TWR5.2.1

(Moved to 7.1.12)

TWR5.2.2 Complete tank farms ventilation upgrades Project W-030 and begin operation by December 31, 1996.

TWR5.2.3 Complete construction of the cross-site transfer system by August 31, 1997.

TWR6 Establish a comprehensive safety management system which ensures there is an adequate authorization basis.

* Percent of fee pool = 6%

TWR6.1 Establish Authorization Basis for the Tank Farms.

TWR6.1.1 Complete transition from TWRS Interim Safety Basis (ISB) to TWRS Basis For Interim Operations within 90 calendar days after PHMC receipt of DOE-RL approval of the TWRS Basis For Interim Operations (BIO), associated Technical Safety Requirements (TSRs), and BIO Compliance Implementation Plan (CIP).

TWR6.1.2 Submit TWRS Draft Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) and FSAR TSRs for the integrated Tier II review by November 15, 1996.

TWR6.1.3 Complete transition from TWRS Basis For Interim Operations to the TWRS Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) within 180 calendar days after PHMC receipt of DOE approval of the TWRS FSAR, associated Technical Safety Requirements (TSR), and Compliance Implementation Plan (CIP).

TWR6.1.4 Deliver a draft plan to implement an Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) in response to DNFSB Recommendation 95-2 by March 17, 1997. Complete demonstration of the ISMS for two diverse projects by September 30, 1997.

TWR7 Complete actions to support Phase I privatization contractor(s).

* Percent of Fee pool = 2%

TWR7.1 Retrieve tank waste; prepare feed for Phase I privatization contractor(s) and receive immobilized waste and secondary waste for storage and disposal

TWR7.1.1 Complete Initial Single-Shell Tank Retrieval System conceptual design by March 3, 1997 (reference TPA Milestone M-45-04A).

TWR7.1.C Complete 101-AZ Mixer Pump Process Test and Evaluation by April 1, 1997.

TWR7.1.D Complete testing of an advanced design mixer pump by September 30, 1997.

TWR7.1.2

(Deleted)

TWR7.1.3 Provide documentation specifying strategy and criteria for Leak Detection, Monitoring and Mitigation (LDMM) to support TPA Milestone

M-45-08-T02 by January 31, 1997.

TWR7.1.4 Issue Request for Proposal (RFP) to industry for the retrieval of tank 241-C-106 heel for the Hanford Tanks Initiative (HTI) project. HTI will provide for the retrieval of waste using commercial retrieval technologies from tank 241-C-106 to meet M-45-04-T02.

TWR7.1.5 Complete Project W-211 Title II design for Tank 102-SY and preparations for Critical Decision 3 by March 31, 1997.

TWR7.1.6

(Deleted)

TWR7.1.7 Update Low-Level Waste and High-Level Waste feed staging plan by August 15, 1997,

TWR7.1.8

(Deleted)

TWR7.1.9

(Deleted)

TWR7.1.10 Provide Double-Shell Tank sonic probe in accordance with Project W-211 design for Tank 102-SY retrieval by September 30, 1997.

TWR7.1.11 Submit to RL the Summary Report for TPA Milestone M-50-03-T2C on Enhanced Sludge Washing by September 12, 1997.

TWR7.1.12 Start definitive design for Project W-314 by January 31, 1997.

TWR7.1.P1 Issue immobilized low-activity waste interim storage facility 90% conceptual design for review by 9/30/97.

TWR7.1.P2 Complete conceptual design- Phase I HLW interim storage facility and transmit to DOE for approval by 9/30/97

TWR7.1.P3 Review and issue immobilized low-activity waste disposal interim performance assessment by 9/30/97.

TWR7.1.P4 Complete Borehole #1 Summary Report by 7/31/97.

TWR8 Provide support to the privatized Phase I contractor(s).

TWR8.1 Comprehensive infrastructure support provided to the privatized Phase I contractor(s).

TWR8.1.1 Participate on the Integrated Process/Product teams to resolve issues with the privatized contractors as identified in the TWRS Privatization RFP (Reference RFP No. DE-RP06-96RL13308 and associated amendments) by September 30, 1997.

TWR8.1.2

(Deleted)

TWR8.1.3 Complete and submit Letters of instruction and/or Activity Planning forms for High-Level Waste, Low-Level Waste and Storage and Disposal (1230, 1240 and 1250) Projects' alternative path, core competency and risk reduction activities by 45 calendar days after formal RL guidance (Reference negotiated TPA Milestone

M-61).

TWR8.1.4 Complete the Design Requirements Documents (DRDs), with exception of the tank and waste transfer upgrades and the Telecommunications DRD, for the Infrastructure projects required to support Phase I privatization by January 30, 1997; and complete conceptual design reports (see MDS T32-97-035, 040, 045 and 055).

TWR8.1.5 Update the TWRS process flowsheets by September 26, 1997.

WASTE MANAGEMENT (SOW Section C.3.B)
Go to Section C.3.B of the PHMC Contract

OBJECTIVE

MEASURES

EXPECTATIONS

LEVEL

WM1 Receive, store, treat, and dispose of Solid Waste in a safe and environmentally compliant manner such that capacity can always satisfy demand, and disposal costs are reduced to a level at which they are preferable to commercially available alternatives.

Percent of fee pool = 8%

WM1.1 Conduct safe operations and maintenance of WRAP 1 Facility.

WM1.1.1 Initiate operations of Waste Receiving and Processing (WRAP) Module I by March 31, 1997.

WM1.2 Initiate Project W-259 for 2706-T (providing secondary containment).

WM1.2.1 Initiate construction of Project W-259 2706-T secondary containment by January 30, 1997.

WM1.3 Site wide customer waste management needs analyzed, alternatives to reduce costs and improve performance considered and adopted where advantageous.

WM1.3.1 Develop and submit for DOE approval an integrated site-wide plan to provide waste management services, including waste processing, characterization, and verification based on design data from WRAP I, at a cost competitive with commercial costs by Septemer 30, 1997.

WM1.3.2. Quality performance standards for solid waste management based upon industry benchmarks are developed by contractor by December 31, 1996 and submitted for negotiations with DOE. Waste management performance against these standards are measured quarterly and meet the negotiated performance levels.

WM1.3.2.1. POSITIVE: Waste management performance against these benchmarks are measured quarterly and exceed the negotiated performance levels by 10% or more.

$25,000

WM1.4 Process, package, and ship decontaminated materials to the Central Waste Complex (CWC), bury, or return to the customer high activity waste/contaminated equipment for storage, disposal, and/or reuse.

WM1.4.1 Provide subject services for less than $700/cubic foot.

WM1.5 Process equipment and/or waste for reuse or disposal as offered by the generators.

WM1.5.1 The waste and/or contaminated equipment shall be processed at a cost less than $120 per cubic foot.

WM1.6 Maintain and accept waste into the low level burial grounds in accordance with; the authorization basis for the solid waste burial grounds, the Hanford Site Solid Waste Acceptance Criteria (HSWAC), the RCRA Permit Application and supplemental submittals, and 200 West and 200 East (when approved) Performance Assessments.

WM1.6.1 Assessments and audits show violations of authorization basis, Performance Assessments, or HSWAC are less than or equal to 95% of FY96 case rates for existing requirements. [Assessments and audits for new requirements during FY97 (particularly the performance assessment implementation) will be included in future year performance measures but not measured as part of the FY97 performance expectation.]

WM1.6.2 Acceptance of waste as described by the generator that does not meet the Hanford Site Solid Waste Acceptance Criteria is evidenced by audit and surveillance on waste acceptance implementation and is less than or equal to 95% of FY96 case rates.

WM1.6.3 Operations, maintenance, and waste acceptance are consistent with the LLBG RCRA permit application and supplemental submittals. Findings of noncompliance by DOE or Ecology on the operating record, operations, and procedures and are less than or equal to 95% of FY96 case rates.

WM1.7 Identify technology needs for waste characterization, treatment, and disposal.

WM1.7.1 Prepare "Mixed Waste Technology Needs" report yearly to meet the budget cycle by January 31, 1997 and annually.

WM1.8 Establish a maintenance program for the 200 West/East Area Burial Grounds Performance Assessment in accordance with HQ issued guidance.

WM1.8.1 Implement a DOE-RL approved program plan and procedures to ensure that operations/waste acceptance are in compliance with the Performance Assessment (PA) by June 30, 1997 and PA is kept current thereafter.

WM2 Minimize the impact to the environment by ceasing unpermitted discharge to the soil column and by providing an infrastructure for treatment, storage and disposal of liquid effluents.

WM2.1 Disposal of all liquid effluents on the Hanford site considers the overall cost to the government of the method(s) of disposal balanced against the benefit(s) from an economic, health, safety, and environmental standpoint.

WM2.1.1 Submit for DOE approval a sitewide integrated decision-making process and procedures for disposal of liquid effluents on the Hanford Site by February 28, 1997.

WM2.2 Compliance with DOE orders, and with federal, state and local requirements in the operation of the liquid effluent facilities, projects and operations.

WM2.2.1 Collect appropriate data and propose draft modifications to DOE for existing waste water discharge permits by March 31, 1997, based on above liquid effluent disposal process.

WM2.2.2 Submit ETF/LERF and 242-A Evaporator Part B permit applications to RL by June 15, 1997.

WM2.2.3 Complete WAC-216 permit application for Category 3 miscellaneous streams and submit to RL by August 30, 1997.

WM2.2.4 Operate 200 Area TEDF, 300 Area TEDF and ETF with no violations of waste discharge permit limits.

WM2.3 Consolidate handling and treatment of liquid effluents in the 200 Area.

WM2.3.1 Implement a coordinated management system to operate 242-A, LERF and ETF by September 30, 1997.

WM2.4 Complete the 200 Area Phase II Streams (Project W-252) modifications to the 200 Area facilities.

WM2.4.1

(Deleted)

WM2.4.2 Complete construction of Phase II stream BAT/AKART implementation by June 30, 1997.

WM2.5 Implement 340 Waste Handling Facility Shutdown Plan.

WM2.5.1 Implement Waste Handling Facility Shutdown Plan at the 340 Waste Handling Facility by January 30, 1997.

WM2.6 Complete Biennial Evaluation of Tritium Treatment Technology and provide report as directed by TPA.

WM2.6.1 Submit tritium technology report to RL by July 31, 1997.

WM3 Manage and integrate the Hanford Analytical Services Program providing analysis, field support, and process development services in support of all programs/projects at Hanford.

Percent of fee pool = 4%

WM3.1 Percent of Hanford Site's analytical work done under Hanford Analytical Services Program.

WM3.1.1 100 percent of Hanford Site's analytical work is accounted for and integrated under the Hanford Analytical Services Program by end of FY97.

WM3.2 Complete the projected analytical/process development needs of Hanford.

WM3.2.1 Determine analytical/Process development needs and Report needs to DOE/RL by May 30, 1997.

WM3.3 Analytical Services work transition to centralized labs from decentralized labs (expressed as percent of number of decentralized labs).

WM3.3.1 Submit strategy for providing site wide analytical needs and plan to consolidate on-site analytical services into 222-S, WSCF, or off-site contractors as applicable and close one-third of decentralized labs by end of FY97, and the remainder by the end of FY98.

WM3.3.2

(Deleted)

WM3.4 Reduction of costs of on-site analytical laboratory services compared to comparable commercial costs.

WM3.4.1 Reduce costs of on-site lab services to ten percent below FY96.

WM3.4.1.1 POSITIVE: Reduce costs of on-site lab services to 20% below FY96.

$50,000

WM3.4.2 Benchmark onsite analytical laboratory services to commercial lab costs before Sept. 30, 1997.

WM3.5 222S personnel radiation exposures.

WM3.5.1 Improve personnel contamination control by reducing contaminated areas in 222-S by 1,500 square feet in FY97 and establishing a strategy to further reduce contaminated areas.

WM4 Manage and integrate a DOE approved pollution prevention and waste minimization program.

Percent of fee pool = 1%

WM4.1 Maintain a site pollution prevention program that complies with federal, state and DOE directives.

WM4.1.1 Implement pollution prevention/ waste minimization concepts into the design of all new projects and/or major modifications per DOE Order 5820.2a by January 1, 1997.

WM4.1.2 Submit Hanford Site Waste Minimization and Pollution Prevention Awareness Program Plan as required by DOE Order 5400.1 by May 31, 1997.

WM4.2 Schedule and conduct pollution prevention opportunity assessments that crosscut the site to determine priority waste streams that can be reduced or eliminated.

WM4.2.1 Incorporate the pollution prevention opportunity assessment tracking and reporting system by September 30, 1997.

WM4.2.2 Provide a report on priority waste streams that can be reduced or eliminated by September 30, 1997 and annually thereafter.

WM4.3 Manage and track Pollution Prevention High Return on Investment Projects.

WM4.3.1 Identify and prioritize Pollution Prevention High-return-on-investment projects by July 15, 1997.

WM4.4 Track and report sitewide activities that reduce volume and/or toxicity of radioactive, mixed, hazardous, and sanitary waste types; and that promote recycling to reduce future risks and costs associated with managing wastes and pollutants.

WM4.4.1 Allocate goals to site waste generators to reduce volume, promote recycling, and meet the Secretary of Energy's Waste Minimization/Pollution Prevention (WM/PP) FY 1999 goals by February 28, 1997.

WM4.4.2 Submit the Annual Report on Waste Generation and Pollution Prevention Progress by September 30, 1997 or later as directed by DOE-HQ guidance.

WM4.4.3 Submit Waste Minimization Reporting and Certification as required under 40 CFR 262, 264, and 265 by April 15, 1997.

WM4.4.4 Meet the Secretarial FY99 WMin/pp goals by September 30, 1998, (one year early).

(NOT APPLICABLE IN FY97)

WM4.4.5 Meet all WMin/pp goals for FY97 established in WM4.4.1 above by September 30, 1997.

WM4.5

(Deleted)

WM4.5.1

(Deleted)

WM4.5.2

(Deleted)

WM5 Manage the transportation, packaging, hazardous materials regulatory compliance, shipper training and traffic management activities in a safe, compliant, and cost-effective manner.

WM5.1 On-site Safety Analysis Reports for Packaging (SARPs) shall be reviewed.

WM5.1.1 Review 20% of on-site SARPs in FY97, and update and revise, or cancel, so that 100% are reviewed by end of contract.

WM5.2 Safe and compliant on-site/off-site transportation and packaging of all materials.

WM5.2.1 Violations, fines or penalties from federal or state organizations associated with transportation are less than or equal to 95% of FY96 case rates.

WM5.2.2

(Deleted)

WM5.3 Perform with cost and schedule constraints as defined in negotiated work plans.

WM5.3.1 We will meet the commitment dates within budget for 90 % of the work tasks having an approved work plan between Transportation & Packaging and the site customer.

WM6

(Deleted)

WM6.1

(Deleted)

WM6.1.1

(Deleted)

WM6.1.2

(Deleted)

SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL (SOW Section C.3.C)
Go to Section C.3.C of the PHMC Contract

OBJECTIVE

MEASURE

EXPECTATION

LEVEL

SNF1 Spent nuclear fuel removed from the K Basins by December 31, 1999.

Percent of fee pool - 3%

SNF1.1 K-Basins Readiness

Percent of fee pool = 1%

SNF1.1.1 Complete construction and installation of the fuel retrieval system equipment at K West Basin by September 30, 1997.

SNF1.1.2 Complete Cask/Transportation basin modifications/construction in K West by August 28, 1997.

SNF1.1.3 Initiate fuel removal from K Basin December 30, 1997.

(NOT APPLICABLE IN FY97)

SNF1.1.4 Complete construction and installation of the Integrated Water Treatment System in K West Basin by September 30, 1997.

SNF1.2 CSB Readiness

Percent of fee pool = 1%

SNF1.2.1 Complete Canister Storage Building construction by September 30, 1997.

SNF1.3 SNF Cask Readiness

Percent of fee pool = 1%

SNF1.3.1 Complete transportation cask and transporter design by January 23, 1997.

SNF1.3.2 Complete design and procurement of the first shipment of MCOs by May 1, 1997.

SNF1.4 CVD Readiness

Percent of fee pool = 1%

SNF1.4.1 Complete physical construction of Cold Vacuum Drying Facility by September 30, 1997.

SNF2 SNF in interim long-term storage by June 30, 2000.

Percent of fee pool = 1%

SNF2.1 HCS Readiness

SNF2.1.1 Complete Hot Conditioning System definitive design, including definition of process criteria, and complete procurement of equipment by September 30, 1997.

SNF2.1.2

(Deleted)

SNF2.1.3

(Deleted)

SNF3. * K-Basins cleaned and transferred to Transition Projects by October 31, 2000.

Percent of fee pool = 1%

SNF3.1 * Percent completion

SNF3.1.1 * Obtain TWRS acceptance of K Basins sludge by September 30, 1997.

SNF3.1.2 * Complete removal of KE empty canisters and clean South Loadout pit by September 30, 1997.

SNF4 Spent Nuclear fuels consolidated in the 200 Area in safe, stable, cost-effective interim storage pending national decision on their ultimate disposition.

SNF4.1 Percent Completion

SNF4.1.1 Project Management Plan for consolidation of other spent fuel submitted to DOE by September 30, 1997.

SNF5 * Establish and mantain financial and managerial control of the SNF project.

Percent of fee pool = 1%

SNF5.1 * Project Management

SNF5.1.1 * Submit updated integrated, resource loaded SNF project schedule by December 31, 1996.

SNF5.1.2 * Reduce the approved FY97 baseline to within the current FY97 funding of $175M.

SNF5.1.3 *

(Deleted)

SNF6 Establish, maintain, and improve environment, health, and safety performance for SNF Project operations and facilities.

SNF6.1 Radiation Exposure/ALARA for exposure and contamination

SNF6.1.1 Radiation exposure performance will meet or exceed approved ALARA goals for SNF Project operation or facility.

SNF6.1.2 SNF Project operations wll be conducted and facilities will be operated using procedures and processes such that personnel contamination events/man year of radiation-work-permit work is <90% of the FY96 case rate.

SNF6.2 Authorization Basis/Unreviewed Safety Questions (USQ)

SNF6.2.1 No (zero) OSR/TSR violations will occur as a result of SNF Project operation conduct and facility operations.

SNF6.2.2 New operations/procedures and newly identified USQ issues will be appropriately addressed.

SNF6.3 Lost Workday and Recordable Cases

SNF6.3.1 Recordable case rate and lost workday case rates will not exceed FY96 accidents rates.

SNF6.4 Conduct of Operations

SNF6.4.1 SNF Project internal audit/ oversight of engineering, design, construction, and operation will demonstrate proper attention to good conduct of operations at all organizational levels by reduction in occurrence reports relating to procedural compliance and inadequate corrective action.

SNF6.5 Environmental Compliance

SNF6.5.1 SNF Project activities will operate with approved permits and within constraints of permitting process.

FACILITIES STABILIZATION (SOW Section C.3.D)
Go to Section C.3.D of the PHMC Contract

OBJECTIVE

MEASURE

EXPECTATION

LEVEL

FS1. Accelerate disposition of nuclear materials, deactivate and transfer PUREX facility to D&D, and reduce the mortgage (out-year maintenance costs) for the facility.

Percent of Fee Pool = 4%

FS1.1 Deactivation and transfer of PUREX facility to D&D.

FS1.1.1 Complete PUREX deactivation by May 15, 1997.

FS1.2 Out-year maintenance costs for PUREX.

FS1.2.1 Approved annual Surveillance and Maintenance baseline costs at project completion = $1.0M.

FS1.3 Cost of PUREX facility transfer.

FS1.3.1 Accomplish PUREX facility transfer to S&M at $23M

FS1.3.1 Positive: Baseline costs< $22M

$100,000

FS2 Complete the 300 Area Fuels Supply transition by March 31, 1998.

FS2.1 Complete the Waste Acid Treatment System (WATS) Closure Field Activities in 303F, 334, and 333 Buildings.

FS2.1.1 Complete the Waste Acid Treatment (WATS) Closure Field Activities in 303F, 334, and 333 buildings by August 15, 1997.

FS3. Manage the stabilization and disposition of nuclear material, fuel, hazardous materials, and deactivate the Fast Flux Facility (FFTF) and associated systems.

FS3.1 Complete Readiness Assessment for SSF operations only.

FS3.1.1 Complete Readiness Assessment for the SSF operations only by January 30, 1997.

FS3.2 Complete Secondary HTS loop and Primary HTS (excluding the reactor vessel) loop sodium drain.

FS3.2.1 Complete Secondary HTS loop drain and Primary HTS (excluding the reactor vessel) loop drain by September 10, 1997.

FS3.3 Wash, package, and transfer FFTF fuel components to ISA in ISCs and to the PFP in ISCs and Disposable Solid Waste Casks (DSWC)

FS3.3.1 Continue the disposition of FFTF irradiated fuel components to the ISA in six ISCs and by transferring unirradiated and slightly irradiated fuel components to the PFP in five DSWCs and three ISCs by September 9, 1997.

FS4 Accelerate the reduction of the B Plant mortgage (out-year maintenance costs) and continue to safely store approximately 73 million curies of Cesium/Strontium in WESF

Percent of Fee Pool = 2%

FS4.1 Construction of Project W-452.

Percent of fee pool = 0.5%

FS4.1.1 Complete construction of Project W-452 by March 1, 1997

FS4.2 Start-up the Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility (WESF) Low-Level Liquid Waste System.

Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5%

FS4.2.1 Complete WESF hot cell and K3 duct cleanup by August 30, 1997, in support of WESF Low-Level Liquid Waste System critical activities.

FS4.3 Start-up the Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility (WESF) Solid Waste System.

Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5%

FS4.3.1 WESF Solid Waste System declared operational (and ready for use) by WESF Plant Operations Management by August 30, 1997.

FS4.4 Start-up the Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility (WESF) Liquid Effluent System.

Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5%

FS4.4.1 WESF Liquid Effluent System declared operational (and ready for use) by WESF Plant Operations Management by August 30, 1997.

FS4.5 Remove organic solvent waste from 221-B Canyon.

Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5%

FS4.5.1 Complete removal of organic solvent waste from 221-B Canyon by February 28, 1997.

FS4.6 Implement B-Plant Interim Safety Basis.

Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5%

FS4.6.1 Complete implementation of B Plant Interim Safety Basis by January 31, 1997.

FS5 Mitigate urgent risks; transition and decommission facility maintain safe storage of special nuclear material in PFP plant.

* Percent of Fee Pool - 3%

FS5.1 Accelerate stabilization of plutonium metal buttons within the PFP vaults.

Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5%

FS5.1.1 Complete oxidation stabilization of existing plutonium metal button (Pu) inventory within PFP vaults by May 1, 1997.

FS5.2 Accelerate cementation of plutonium residue material.

Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5%

FS5.2.1. Complete cementation of 1800 kilograms of bulk plutonium residue materials by September 30, 1997.

FS5.3 Complete construction of direct denitration calciner (Project B-226).

Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5%

FS5.3.1 Commence startup of solution stabilization at PFP by September 16, 1997

FS5.4 Accelerate removal and cleanup of exhaust system ducts.

Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5%

FS5.4.1 Complete duct segment #4 as defined in WHC-SD-CP-PMP-003 (dated March 17, 1989) by July 31, 1997.

FS5.4.2 Complete removal of approximately 80 feet (out of approximately 80 feet) of 232-Z Exhaust Ventilation Ducting in 291-Z. Complete by September 30, 1997.

FS5.4.3 Complete removal of approximately 200 feet (out of approximately 600 feet) of Inactive Process Vacuum System, Segment #5. Complete by September 30, 1997.

FS6 * Accelerate deactivation of PFP facilities to reduce mortgage.

FS6.1. * Accelerate deactivation and transfer facilities to D&D program.

FS6.1.1. * Submit plan for deactivation of PFP by July 31, 1997.

FS7 * Safe storage and ultimate disposition of approximately 73 million curies cesium and strontium in WESF.

FS7.1 * Safe storage of Cs and Sr capsules.

FS7.1.1 * Operate WESF facility without storage or transportation violations.

FS7.2

(Deleted)

FS7.2.1 *

(Deleted)

FS8. Mitigate risks; transition and deactivate facility; maintain safe interim storage of nuclear material in the 324/327 facilities.

FS8.1 Remove fuel pins and pieces from 327 Building.

Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5%

FS8.1.1 The fuel pins and fuel pin pieces in 327 basin will be placed in casks and shipped to a TBD storage location by September 30, 1997.

FS8.2 Continue removal of legacy wastes.

Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5%

FS8.2.1 Complete all activities to allow shipment of the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) logs from 324 by August 30, 1997.

FS8.3 Develop an end point criteria document for transition activities.

Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5%

FS8.3.1 Provide DOE-RL with a draft end point criteria document by March 31, 1997.

FS8.4 Develop a draft Project Management Plan and integrated facility schedule of transition activities.

Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5%

FS8.4.1 Provide DOE-RL with a draft Project Management Plan for transition activities and an integrated facility schedule with the cost estimate by July 31, 1997, for activities needed to transition the facility to ER.

FS8.5 Remove Cesium capsules from 327 Building.

Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5 %

FS8.5.1 Remove Cesium capsules from 327 Building by September 30, 1997.

INFRASTRUCTURE (SOW Section C.4)
Go to Section C.4 of the PHMC Contract

OBJECTIVE

MEASURE

EXPECTATION

LEVEL

IS1 Maximize efficiency and effectiveness of RL site infrastructure supplies and services.

Percent of Fee Pool = 3%

IS1.1 * Maintenance backlog.

IS1.1.1 * Develop metrics to evaluate and make recommendations to bring RL in line with commercial standards and practices in maintaining infrastructure facilities.

IS1.2 * Material loss rate.

IS1.2.1 * Reduce the total line items in the financially and non-financially controlled inventories by 5% in FY 1997.

IS1.3. Total cost for Hanford Local Area Network (HLAN).

IS1.3.1 Develop and submit a benchmarking study by March 31, 1997.

IS1.4. Annual sitewide costs for maintenance, storage, and document control of all site records.

IS1.4.1 Meet performance and cost goals based on IRM metric benchmarking study

IS2 Optimize Cost of Intrastructure support and services.

Percent of fee pool = 6%

IS2.1 Cost of employee occupancy pool

IS2.1.1 Cost of the occupancy pool reduced to 10% less than FY97 budget per SSPP/WBS 6.8.

IS2.2 Optimize Cost of Infrastructure support and services.

IS2.2.1 Reduce DOE HO-coded inventory 10% by September 30, 1997.

IS2.2.1.1 Positive: > 15% - 25,000,

> 20% - 50,000 (total)

IS2.3 Cost, above power purchase cost, for delivery of electrical utility services sitewide, maintaining satisfactory level of system availability and reliability.

IS2.3.1 Reduce cost above purchased power cost for delivery of electrical utility service for transmission and distribution to £$0.014/kilowatt hour.

IS2.4 Total price/gallon of potable water.

IS2.4.1. Total price/gallon for sitewide potable water £ $ 0.0065.

IS2.5. * Infrastructure Operations and Maintenance.

IS2.5.1. * Establish a baseline to evaluate and reduce DOE cost of maintaining general office space.

IS2.6 * Reduce inventory carrying costs.

IS2.6.1. * Reduce inventory management costs by 47% in FY97compared to FY95 actual costs.

IS2.7.* Reduce per unit costs for calibration services.

IS2.7.1. * Reduce per unit costs for calibration services by 10% by September 30, 1997.

IS3.* Outsource infrastructure support services available for procurement.

Percent of fee pool = 1%

IS3.1.* Outsource percentage

IS3.1.1. * Complete a Systems Functional Analysis addressing the seven major infrastructure support services, and an implementation plan/schedule for the optimization of such services, by March 28, 1997.

IS3.1.1.1.* A bonus of $50K applies if the deliverable is completed by January 6, 1997; a bonus of $30K applies if the deliverable is completed by February 3, 1997; a bonus of $20K applies if the deliverable is completed by March 3, 1997.