Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract

Download WordPerfect 5.1 Version

DE-AC06-96RL13200
Modification M020

WASTE MANAGEMENT (SOW Section C.3.B)
OBJECTIVE MEASURES EXPECTATIONS LEVEL
WM1 Receive, store, treat, and dispose of Solid Waste in a safe and environmentally compliant manner such that capacity can always satisfy demand, and disposal costs are reduced to a level at which they are preferable to commercially available alternatives.

Percent of fee pool = 8%

 WM1.1 Conduct safe operations and maintenance of WRAP 1 Facility. WM1.1.1 Initiate operations of Waste Receiving and Processing (WRAP) Module I by March 31, 1997.  
WM1.2 Initiate Project W-259 for 2706-T (providing double containment). WM1.2.1 Initiate construction of Project W-259 2706-T secondary containment by January 30, 1997.  
WM1.3 Site wide customer waste management needs analyzed, alternatives to reduce costs and improve performance considered and adopted where advantageous. WM1.3.1 Develop and submit for DOE approval an integrated site-wide plan to provide waste management services, including waste processing, characterization, and verification based on design data from WRAP I, at a cost competitive with commercial costs by Sept. 30, 1997.  
WM1.3.2. Quality performance standards for solid waste management based upon industry benchmarks are developed by contractor by Dec. 31, 1996 and submitted for negotiations with DOE. Waste management performance against these standards are measured quarterly and meet the negotiated performance levels. WM1.3.2.1. POSITIVE: Waste management performance against these benchmarks are measured quarterly and exceed the negotiated performance levels by 10% or more.

$25,000

WM1.4 Process, package, and ship decontaminated materials to the Central Waste Complex (CWC), bury, or return to the customer high activity waste/contaminated equipment for storage, disposal, and/or reuse. WM1.4.1 Provide subject services for less than $700.00 per cubic foot.  
WM1.5 Process equipment and/or waste for reuse or disposal as offered by the generators. WM1.5.1 The waste and/or contaminated equipment shall be processed at a cost less than $120.00 per cubic foot.  
WM1.6 Maintain and accept waste into the low level burial grounds in accordance with: the authorization basis for the solid waste burial grounds, the Hanford Site Solid Waste Acceptance Criteria (HSWAC), the RCRA Permit Application and supplemental submittals, and 200 West Area and 200 East (when approved) Performance Assessments. WM1.6.1 Assessments and audits show the Authorization Basis and Performance Assessments for the Low-Level Burial Grounds are being implemented and no significant violations have occurred.  
WM1.6.2 Acceptance of waste meets the Hanford Site Solid Waste Acceptance Criteria as evidenced by audit and surveillance on waste acceptance implementation.
WM1.6.3 Operations, maintenance, and waste acceptance are consistent with RCRA interim status requirements (as implemented through WAC 173-303). Contractor will evaluate requirements of the LLBG permit application and supplemental submittals.
WM1.7 Identify technology needs for waste characterization, treatment, and disposal. WM1.7.1 Prepare "Mixed Waste Technology Needs" report yearly to meet the budget cycle by January 31, 1997 and annually.  
WM1.8 Establish a maintenance program for the 200 West/East Area Burial Grounds Performance Assessment in accordance with HQ issued guidance. WM1.8.1 Implement a DOE-RL approved program plan and procedures to ensure that operations/waste acceptance are in compliance with the Performance Assessment (PA) by June 30, 1997 and PA is kept current thereafter.  
WM2 Minimize the impact to the environment by ceasing unpermitted discharge to the soil column and by providing an infrastructure for treatment, storage and disposal of liquid effluents. WM2.1 Disposal of all liquid effluents on the Hanford site considers the overall cost to the government of the method(s) of disposal balanced against the benefit(s) from an economic, health, safety, and environmental standpoint. WM2.1.1 Submit for DOE approval a sitewide integrated decision-making process and procedures for disposal of liquid effluents on the Hanford Site by February 28, 1997.  
WM2.2 Compliance with DOE orders, and with federal, state and local requirements in the operation of the liquid effluent facilities, projects and operations. WM2.2.1 Collect appropriate data and propose draft modifications to DOE for existing waste water discharge permits by March 31, 1997, based on above liquid effluent disposal process.  
  WM2.2.2 Submit ETF/LERF/242-A and 242-A Evaporator Part B permit applications to RL by June 15, 1997.  
  WM2.2.3 Complete WAC-216 permit application for Category 3 miscellaneous streams and submit to RL by August 30, 1997, or negotiate with Ecology to eliminate the need for a WAC-216 permit for Category 3 miscellaneous streams.  
  WM2.2.4 Operate 200 Area TEDF, 300 Area TEDF and ETF with no violations of waste discharge permit limits.  
WM2.3 Consolidate handling and treatment of liquid effluents in the 200 Area. WM2.3.1 Implement a coordinated management system to operate 242-A, LERF and ETF by September 30, 1997.  
WM2.4 Complete the 200 Area Phase II Streams (Project W-252) modifications to the 200 Area facilities. WM2.4.2 Complete construction of Phase II stream BAT/AKART implementation by June 30, 1997.  
WM2.5 Implement 340 Waste Handling Facility Shutdown Plan. WM2.5.1 Implement Waste Handling Facility Shutdown Plan at the 340 Waste Handling Facility by January 30, 1997.  
WM2.6 Complete Biennial Evaluation of Tritium Treatment Technology and provide report as directed by TPA. WM2.6.1 Submit tritium technology report to RL by July 31, 1997.  
WM3 Manage and integrate the Hanford Analytical Services Program providing analysis, field support, and process development services in support of all programs/projects at Hanford.

Percent of fee pool = 4%

 WM3.1 Percent of Hanford Sites analytical work done under Hanford Analytical Services program. WM3.1.1 100 percent of Hanford Sites analytical work is accounted for and integrated under Hanford Analytical Services Program by end of FY97.  
WM3.2 Complete the projected analytical/process development needs of Hanford. WM3.2.1 Determine analytical/process development needs and report needs to DOE/RL by May 30, 1997.  
WM3.3 Analytical Services work transition to centralized labs from decentralized labs (expressed as percent of number of decentralized labs). WM3.3.1 Submit strategy for providing site-wide analytical needs and plan to transition on-site analytical services into 222-S, WSCF, or off-site contractors as applicable, and provide transition actions for one-third of decentralized analytical laboratories.  
WM3.4 Reduction of costs of on-site analytical laboratory services compared to comparable commercial costs. WM3.4.1 Reduce costs of on-site laboratory services to ten percent below fiscal year 1996. WM3.4.1.1 POSITIVE: Reduce costs of on-site laboratory services to 20% below fiscal year 1996.

$50,000

WM3.4.2 Benchmark onsite analytical laboratory services to commercial lab costs before Sept. 30, 1997.  
WM3.5 222S personnel radiation exposures. WM3.5.1 Improve personnel contamination control by reducing contaminated areas in 222-S by 1,500 square feet in fiscal year 1997 and establishing a strategy to further reduce contaminated areas.  
WM4 Manage and integrate a DOE approved pollution prevention and waste minimization program.

Percent of fee pool = 1%

 WM4.1 Maintain a site pollution prevention program that complies with federal, state and DOE directives. WM4.1.1 Implement pollution prevention/ waste minimization concepts into the design of all new projects and/or major modifications per DOE Order 5820.2a.  
WM4.1.2 Submit Hanford Site Waste Minimization and Pollution Prevention Awareness Program Plan as required by DOE Order 5400.1 by May 31, 1997.  
WM4.2 Schedule and conduct pollution prevention opportunity assessments that crosscut the site to determine priority waste streams that can be reduced or eliminated. WM4.2.1 Incorporate the pollution prevention opportunity assessment tracking and reporting system by September 30, 1997.  
WM4.2.2 Provide a report on priority waste streams that can be reduced or eliminated by September 30, 1997 and annually thereafter.  
WM4.3 Manage and track Pollution Prevention High Return on Investment Projects. WM4.3.1 Identify and prioritize Pollution Prevention High-return-on-investment projects.  
WM4.4 Track and report sitewide activities that reduce volume and/or toxicity of radioactive, mixed, hazardous, and sanitary waste types; and that promote recycling to reduce future risks and costs associated with managing wastes and pollutants. WM4.4.1 Allocate goals to site waste generators by designated waste stream, to reduce volume, promote recycling, and meet the Secretary of Energy's Waste Minimization/Pollution Prevention (WM/PP) FY 1999 goals by February 28, 1997.  
  WM4.4.2 Submit the Annual Report on Waste Generation and Pollution Prevention Progress by September 30, 1997 or later as directed by DOE-HQ guidance.  
  WM4.4.3 Submit waste minimization certification and reporting as required by 40 CFR 313, Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (TPA), Executive Order 12873, and RL direction by June 15, 1997.  
  WM4.4.4 Meet the Secretarial FY99 WMin/pp goals by September 30, 1998, (one year early).

(NOT APPLICABLE IN FY97)

 
  WM4.4.5 Meet all WMin/pp goals for FY97 established in WM4.4.1 above by September 30, 1997.  
WM5 Manage the transportation, packaging, hazardous materials regulatory compliance, shipper training and traffic management activities in a safe, compliant, and cost-effective manner. WM5.1 On-site Safety Analysis Reports for Packaging (SARPs) shall be reviewed. WM5.1.1 Review of 20% of on-site SARPs in FY97, and update and revise, or cancel, so that 100% are reviewed by end of contract.  
WM5.2 Safe and compliant on-site/off-site transportation and packaging of all materials. WM5.2.1 Violations, fines or penalties from federal or state organizations associated with transportation are less than or equal to 95% of FY96 case rates.  
WM5.3 Perform with cost and schedule constraints as defined in negotiated work plans. WM5.3.1 We will meet the commitment dates within budget for 90% of the work tasks having an approved work plan between Transportation & Packaging and the site customer.  

SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL (SOW Section C.3.C) 
OBJECTIVE  MEASURE  EXPECTATION  LEVEL 
SNF1 Spent nuclear fuel removed from the K Basins by December 31, 1999.

Percent of fee pool - 3%

 		 SNF1.1 K-Basins Readiness

Percent of fee pool = 1%

 		 SNF1.1.1 Complete the Fuel Retrieval System KE facility modification design.

Due Date: September 26, 1997

 		  
  SNF1.1.2 Complete installation of the Cask/Transportation Pail Support Platform in K West by September 30, 1997.  
  SNF1.1.3 Initiate fuel removal from K Basin December 30, 1997.

(NOT APPLICABLE IN FY97)

 		  
  SNF1.1.4 Complete the design of the Integrated Water Treatment System for K West by August 31, 1997.  
SNF1.2 CSB Readiness

Percent of fee pool = 1%

 		 SNF1.2.1 Complete Canister Storage construction by September 30, 1997.  
SNF1.3 SNF Cask Readiness

Percent of fee pool = 1%

 		 SNF1.3.1 Complete transportation cask and transporter design by January 23, 1997.  
  SNF1.3.2 Complete design and procurement of the first shipment of MCOs by September 30, 1997.  
SNF1.4 CVD Readiness

Percent of fee pool = 1%

 		 SNF1.4.1 Complete physical construction of Cold Vacuum Drying Facility by September 30, 1997.  
SNF2 SNF in interim long-term storage by June 30, 2000.

Percent of fee pool = 1%

 		 SNF2.1 HCS Readiness SNF2.1.1 Complete Hot Conditioning System definitive design, including definition of process criteria, and complete procurement of equipment by September 30, 1997.  
  SNF2.1.2

(Deleted)

 		  
  SNF2.1.3

(Deleted)

 		  
SNF3. * K-Basins cleaned and transferred to Transition Projects by October 31, 2000.

Percent of fee pool = 1%

 		 SNF3.1 * Percent completion SNF3.1.1 * Obtain TWRS acceptance of K Basins sludge by September 30, 1997.  
  SNF3.1.2 * Complete removal of KE empty canisters and clean South Loadout pit by September 30, 1997.  
SNF4 Spent Nuclear fuels consolidated in the 200 Area in safe, stable, cost-effective interim storage pending national decision on their ultimate disposition. SNF4.1 Percent Completion SNF4.1.1 Project Management Plan for consolidation of other spent fuel submitted to DOE by September 30, 1997.  
SNF5 * Establish and mantain financial and managerial control of the SNF project.

Percent of fee pool = 1%

 		 SNF5.1 * Project Management SNF5.1.1 * Submit updated integrated, resource loaded SNF project schedule by December 31, 1996.  
  SNF5.1.2 * Reduce the approved FY97 baseline to within the current FY97 funding of $175M.  
  SNF5.1.3 *

(Deleted)

 		  
SNF6 Establish, maintain, and improve environment, health, and safety performance for SNF Project operations and facilities. SNF6.1 Radiation Exposure/ALARA for exposure and contamination SNF6.1.1 Radiation exposure performance will meet or exceed approved ALARA goals for SNF Project operation or facility.  
  SNF6.1.2 SNF Project operations will be conducted and facilities will be operated using procedures and processes such that personnel contamination events/man year of radiation-work-permit work is <90% of the FY96 case rate.  
SNF6.2 Authorization Basis/Unreviewed Safety Questions (USQ) SNF6.2.1 No (zero) OSR/TSR violations will occur as a result of SNF Project operation conduct and facility operations.  
  SNF6.2.2 New operations/procedures and newly identified USQ issues will be appropriately addressed.  
SNF6.3 Lost Workday and Recordable Cases SNF6.3.1 Recordable case rate and lost workday case rates will not exceed FY96 accidents rates.  
SNF6.4 Conduct of Operations SNF6.4.1 SNF Project internal audit/ oversight of engineering, design, construction, and operation will demonstrate proper attention to good conduct of operations at all organizational levels by reduction in occurrence reports relating to procedural compliance and inadequate corrective action.  
SNF6.5 Environmental Compliance SNF6.5.1 SNF Project activities will operate with approved permits and within constraints of permitting process.  

INFRASTRUCTURE (SOW Section C.4) 
OBJECTIVE  MEASURE  EXPECTATION  LEVEL 
IS1 Maximize efficiency and effectiveness of RL site infrastructure supplies and services.

Percent of Fee Pool = 3%

 		 IS1.1 * Maintenance backlog. IS1.1.1 * Develop metrics to evaluate and make recommendations to bring RL in line with commercial standards and practices in maintaining infrastructure facilities.  
IS1.2 * Material loss rate. IS1.2.1 * Reduce the total line items in the financially and non-financially controlled inventories by 5% in FY 1997.  
IS1.3. Total cost for Hanford Local Area Network (HLAN). IS1.3.1 Develop and submit a benchmarking study by March 31, 1997.
IS1.4. Annual sitewide costs for maintenance, storage, and document control of all site records. IS1.4.1 Meet performance and cost goals based on IRM metric benchmarking study  
IS2 Optimize Cost of Infrastructure support and services.

Percent of fee pool = 6%		 IS2.1 Cost of employee occupancy pool IS2.1.1 Cost of the occupancy pool reduced to 10% less than FY97 budget per SSPP/WBS 6.8.  
IS2.2 Optimize Cost of Infrastructure support and services. IS2.2.1 Reduce DOE HO-coded inventory 10% by September 30, 1997. IS2.2.1.1 Positive: > 15% - 25,000,

> 20% - 50,000 (total)

 
IS2.3 Cost, above power purchase cost, for delivery of electrical utility services sitewide, maintaining satisfactory level of system availability and reliability. IS2.3.1 Reduce cost above purchased power cost for delivery of electrical utility service for transmission and distribution to $0.014/kilowatt hour.  
IS2.4 Total price/gallon of potable water. IS2.4.1. Total price/gallon for sitewide potable water $0.00623.  
IS2.5. * Infrastructure Operations and Maintenance. IS2.5.1. * Establish a baseline to evaluate and reduce DOE cost of maintaining general office space.  
IS2.6 * Reduce inventory carrying costs. IS2.6.1. * Reduce inventory management costs by 47% in FY97 compared to FY95 actual costs.  
IS2.7.* Reduce per unit costs for calibration services. IS2.7.1. * Reduce calibration lab cost by 38% from FY 1995 originated budget baseline.  
IS3.* Outsource infrastructure support services available for procurement.

Percent of fee pool = 1%

 		 IS3.1.* Outsource percentage IS3.1.1. * Complete a Systems Functional Analysis addressing the seven major infrastructure support services, and an implementation plan/schedule for the optimization of such services, by March 28, 1997. IS3.1.1.1.* A bonus of $50K applies if the deliverable is completed by January 6, 1997; a bonus of $30K applies if the deliverable is completed by February 3, 1997; a bonus of $20K applies if the deliverable is completed by March 3, 1997.
[Hanford Home Page] [Table of Contents]
For questions or comments about this page, please send email to: Yvonne Sherman@rl.gov
The URL for this page is http://www.hanford.gov/phmc/contract/mods/m020/m020.htm
Document Number: DE-AC06-96RL13200
Mod: M020