Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract
Download WordPerfect 5.1 Version
DE-AC06-96RL13200
Modification M022
| SITE MANAGEMENT ( SOW Section C.2) | |||
| OBJECTIVE | MEASURES | EXPECTATIONS | LEVEL |
| SM1. Develop an integrated technical,
schedule, and cost baseline for the Hanford
Site. (See SOW Section C.2.A)
Percent of fee pool = 5% |
SM1.1 Integrated technical basis, cost estimates, and schedules for work required to achieve Hanford strategies in a manner to enable timely acceptance, validation, and work authorization by DOE. | SM1.1.1 Integrated Site baseline with supporting work plans, including input of other prime contractors, submitted not later than July 31, 1997. | |
| SM2. Provide a high level integrated
sitewide systems engineering process and
products.
Percent of fee pool = 3% |
SM2.1 Maintain and improve an iterative process to ensure a consistent set of top-down integrated systems engineering documents. | SM2.1.1 Provide integrated Sitewide systems engineering database capabilities by July 31, 1997. | |
| SM2.1.2 A Systems Engineering Management Plan submitted to RL by Oct. 1, 1996. | |||
| SM2.1.3 Demonstration of systems engineering products with configuration management at the sitewide level by July 31, 1997. | SM2.1.3.1 Positive: By May 1, 1997
$100,000 | ||
| SM2.2 Improvement of sitewide systems engineering product quality and reliability. | SM2.2.1 A minimum of 90% of the sitewide systems engineering database is accurate; with inconsistencies, omissions, and errors identified and critical issues identified and being tracked in the sitewide systems engineering resolutions process by July 31, 1997. | SM2.2.1.1 Positive: 98% accuracy by
July 1, 1997
$100,000 | |
| SM2.3 Subcontractors apply systems engineering principles as appropriate for their scope of work with integration to the sitewide systems engineering program. | SM2.3.1 Demonstrate clear linkage of data integration for sitewide systems engineering database with configuration management from subcontractors to the PHMC and from the PHMC into subcontractor requirements and work plans by July 31, 1997. | SM2.3.1.1 Positive: by May 1, 1997
$100,000 | |
| SM3 Integrated management systems
maintain the Hanford Site managerially in
control. (See SOW Section C.2.B)
Percent of fee pool = 2% |
SM3.1 Manage and integrate Hanford Site activities in a timely manner. | SM3.1.1 Deliver a Management &
Integration Plan for DOE by October 1,
1996, except for the following sub- plan:
- Risk Management Plan: due January 31, 1997 |
|
| SM3.2 Policies and procedures promote efficient and effective management of contract responsibilities. | SM3.2.1 Implement site planning and integration policies and procedures in accordance with the approved Management & Integration Plan by March 31, 1997. | ||
| SM3.3 Automated management information system(s) ensure accessible, timely, accurate, useful, and reliable technical, budget, schedule, financial, performance (all aspects including safety), baseline control information, while continuing to provide timely and accurate support to DOE decision-making process in the interim. | SM3.3.1 Management information system(s) provide accurate and timely decision-making capabilities to DOE. Successfully demonstrate system, including linkage capability to DOE-HQ reporting systems by July 31, 1997. | ||
| SM3.4 Benchmarking substantiates contractors' performance. | SM3.4.1 Benchmarking plan including appropriate cost and performance measures and ratios submitted by July 31, 1997, so that benchmarking substantiates high performance (by both PHMC and Major Subcontractors) against other private and public companies. | ||
| SM3.4.2. Benchmarking implemented within 30 days after DOE-RL approval. | |||
| SM3.6 Personnel assets closely aligned to needs dictated by authorized work scope. PHMC and Major Subcontractors staffed "for the valleys" with "peaks" handled by subcontract. | SM3.6.1 Submit preliminary, draft staffing
forecast to DOE by November 1, 1996.
Submit draft staffing forecast to DOE by December 15, 1996. |
||
| SM3.6.2 Submit final staffing analysis to DOE by January 31, 1997. | |||
| SM4 Integrated financial systems maintain
the Hanford site financially in control.
Percent of fee pool = 2% |
SM4.1 Efficient, effective financial systems provide useful, accurate and timely financial information, compliant with rules and regulations such as DOE orders, Cost Accounting Standards, and generally accepted Accounting Standards. | SM4.1.1 Develop a successful cost reporting system capable of reporting by WBS, including both functional and programmatic areas by December 31, 1996. | |
| SM4.1.2 Contractor's financial systems successfully undergo a DOE-RL Office of Chief Financial Officer review and approval process with no material exceptions by July 31, 1997. | |||
| SM4.1.3 Invoices are generated from an accounting system approved by DOE-RL and are timely. | |||
| SM4.1.4 Monthly letter of credit
reconciliation report of costs incurred and invoiced for the month (with draw downs or checks paid) is timely submitted. |
|||
| SM4.1.5 Disclosure statement(s) reflecting actual practices and fully compliant with Cost Accounting Standards are submitted by October 1, 1996 and annually thereafter. | |||
| SM4.2 Administrative control of funds processes are implemented and uncosted balances are minimized. | SM4.2.1 Interim administrative control of funds system and procedures are in place and approved by RL by October 1, 1996. | ||
| SM4.2.2 All necessary personnel have been trained by December 1, 1996. | |||
| SM4.2.3 No funds ceilings are exceeded in FY 1997. | |||
| SM4.2.4 On September 30, 1997, uncosted balances meet the thresholds established in the DOE HQ's CFO policy on carryover balances | |||
| SM4.3 An effective internal audit capability reviews contractor financial activities and those of its major subcontractors. | SM4.3.1. Successful implementation of the requirements of the Internal Audit Clause as required by DOE Acquisition Letter 90-3R. | ||
| SM4.4 Acceptable forward pricing rates allow for timely completion of the Activity Data Sheet budget formulation process. | SM4.4.1 Forward pricing rates must be received by RL by December 15, 1996, and annually thereafter. | ||
| SM4.5 Provide acceptable funding execution rates for timely completion of the Fiscal Year Work Plans. | SM4.5.1 Funding execution rates must be received by RL by June 15, 1997, and annually thereafter. | ||
| SM4.6F Implement recommended indirect reductions identified by analysis performed in FY96 or provide RL with acceptable justification for not implementing. | SM4.6.1 Successful completion will occur if by September 30, 1997, all reductions are either implemented or waived by RL, based on a justification from the contractor. | ||
| SM5 ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY AND
HEALTH. Manage and integrate ESH&Q
across the Hanford site.
Percent of fee pool = 4% |
SM5.1 Develop and implement a DOE/RL approved ESH Management Plan, that includes implementation guidance for DNFSB Recommendation 95-2. | SM5.1.1 Submit plan to RL for approval by December 31, 1996. | |
| SM5.1.2 (Deleted) | |||
| SM5.2 Develop and implement a plan for conducting independent and self assessments. | SM5.2.1 Plan developed, submitted to RL-PAD and implemented by November 30, 1996. | ||
| SM5.3 Provide single point of contact interface(s) for DOE-RL for environmental and for safety and health matters. | SM5.3.1 Communications of environmental or safety and health direction and information between RL and contractor organizations passes through a single point of contact identified by October 1, 1996. | ||
| SM5.3.2 Contractor will provide a single point of contact for coordination & facilitation of all regulatory agency visits & inspections by October 1, 1996 | |||
| SM5.4 Develop performance indicators for ES&H and Quality Assurance. | SM5.4.1 Develop performance indicators for ES&H and quality assurance. Submit proposed safety & health and quality assurance performance indicators to RL for approval by December 1, 1996. Submit environmental performance indicators to RL for approval by August 1, 1997. | ||
| SM5.4.2 Implement safety and health and quality assurance indicators by January 1, 1997 and establish baseline. | |||
| SM5.5 Develop and implement a single, sitewide, consolidated, automated deficiency management tracking, trending, and reporting system as part of a site-wide management system. | SM5.5.1 Complete system development by July 31, 1997. | ||
| SM5.6 Prevent inadvertent use of counterfeit parts. | SM5.6.1 Processes and controls are in
place to provide confidence that |
||
| SM5.7 * Program developed for obtaining a
VPP Star Status at Project Hanford.
Percent of fee pool = 1% |
SM5.7.1* By December 31, 1996, all Major Subcontractors submit strategic plans for obtaining VPP Star Status. | ||
| SM5.7.2 * Major Subcontractors will submit application of VPP Star Status in FY98 with the one year required implementation beginning in FY97. | |||
| SM5.8 * Control chemical purchase and subsequent use to minimize hazardous waste generation. | SM5.8.1 * Evaluate existing chemical tracking database for completeness of hazardous chemicals by March 31, 1997. | ||
| SM5.8.2 *Evaluate and make recommendations for upgrading the chemical procurement system by September 30, 1997. | |||
| SM6 ENVIRONMENT, SAFTEY, AND
HEALTH. Achieve high performance in
S&H across the site.
Percent of fee pool 2% |
SM6.1 Manage and integrate the site Emergency Preparedness program. | SM6.1.1 Implement the existing Site Emergency Response Organization Re-engineering Project Plan by July 1, 1997. | |
| SM6.2 Annually, prepare, conduct, and critique one tabletop exercise, one field full-participation exercise and one radiological assistance program (RAP) exercise. | SM6.2.1 Complete tabletop, field, and RAP exercises by September 30, 1997. | ||
| SM6.3 Manage fire protection programs to minimize the consequences of fire on the site. Develop plan to implement the fire department baseline needs assessment. | SM6.3.1 Submit implementation plan for DOE-RL approval by January 1, 1997. | ||
| SM6.4 Complete fire hazards analyses and fire protection shutdown plans. | SM6.4.1 By September 30, 1997, complete FHAs for existing nuclear facilities. | ||
| SM6.4.2 Complete Fire Protection Shutdown Plans for each facility to support scheduled shutdown of fire protection features. | |||
| SM6.5 Reduce site property fire loss rates. | SM6.5.1 FY-97 fire loss rates shall not exceed 80% of the RL 5 yr average fire property loss rate. | ||
| SM6.6 Continue implementation of the Occupational Health Process. | M6.6.1 Submit plan for transferring workplace hazard and worker-at-risk data from PHMC to the site occupational medical contractor (SOMC) for DOE-RL approval by December 31, 1996. | ||
| SM6.6.2 Complete implementation of the Occupational Health Process by June 30, 1997. | |||
| SM6.7 Develop coordinated business plan between the PHMC and the site occupational medical contractor. | SM6.7.1 Business plan approved by PHMC and SOMC by December 31, 1996. | ||
| SM6.8 Complete development and implement the Radiological Controls Improvement Program . | SM6.8.1 Submit Draft Radiological Controls Improvement Plan to RL, as a working document, by March 31, 1997. Develop and submit Final Radiological Improvement Plan to RL for approval by September 1, 1997, to address radiological control elements not included in the Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS). | ||
| SM6.8.2 Integrate the implementation schedule of the Radiological Control Improvement Plan with the Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) implementation plan and schedule. Program Improvements implemented in accordance with DOE approved schedule | |||
| SM6.9 * Reduce injury/illness rates sitewide. | SM6.9.1 * Reduce sitewide injury cost index to 8 or less during FY97. | ||
| SM6.10 * Reduce radiation exposures sitewide | SM6.10.1 * Reduce annual radiation exposure to workers by better than 25% of the FY96 level in FY97 (normalized for increased work in radiation areas). | ||
| SM7 ENVIRONMENT, SAFTEY, AND
HEALTH. Achieve high performance in
enviromental stewardship at Hanford Site.
Percent of fee pool = 2% |
SM7.1 Implementation of an Environmental Management System (EMS) consistent with the principles of ISO 14000. | SM7.1.1 The Contractor senior management will provide written commitments to conduct business in a manner consistent with ISO 14000 Environmental Management System concepts by October 1, 1996. | |
| SM7.1.2 Integrate Environmental Management System (EMS) elements into Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS), as appropriate, by July 1, 1997. Complete a crosswalk between ISMS and the desired Environmental Management System by August 31, 1997. This crosswalk is to be included as part of the ISMS. | |||
| SM7.1.3 Develop and submit by August 1, 1997, a schedule for implementing identified tasks based on the Environmental Management System Implementation Plan (input to the ISMS) and tailor to be consistent with the developing Integrated Safety Management System Plan (ISMS). | |||
| SM7.1.4 Compliance with EMS concepts
will be demonstrated through the
Contractor's self-assessment program by
January 1, 1998.
(Not applicable in fiscal year l997) |
|||
| SM7.2 Manage & integrate a technically competent, multi-media (with the exception of groundwater) ambient environmental monitoring program, in an efficient, cost effective manner. | SM7.2.1 Submit for RL approval a plan and recommendations for integration of required environmental monitoring by April 1, 1997. | ||
| SM7.3 Deliver to RL for timely submittal to the regulatory agencies, clearly written, complete reports meeting the requirements defined by the regulatory agencies or DOE-HQ. | SM7.3.1 At least 14 days before they are due to the regulatory agencies, the contractor will provide complete, final drafts of all routine or scheduled environmental reports required by regulatory agencies or DOE-HQ. | ||
| SM7.4 * Implement an effective environmental protection program that prevents occurrences. | SM7.4.1 * Establish an environmental occurrence reporting program. | ||
| SM8 KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL.
Provide a stable management group.
* (Negative incentive only) |
SM8.1 Contractor and Major Subcontractor management key personnel remain in their proposed positions long enough to effect change to the Hanford way of doing business. | SM8.1.1 Individuals named as key management personnel in this contract (both Prime and Major Subcontractor) shall not be moved without DOE approval by the Contractor to another Contractor activity or position before September 30, 1997. | SM8.1.1.1. Negative: For each key management person who does not remain through September 30, 1997, the total fee earned will be reduced by $50,000 per person up to a maximum of $300,000. |
| SM9 HUMAN RESOURCES. Human Resources Programs provide a workplace environment conducive to employee well-being and growth; provide innovative compensation practices & personnel initiatives, aligned with the commercial marketplace; and attract and retain a diverse, well-trained work force capable of successfully executing Hanford's mission. | SM9.1 Employee labor cost factor = (salary + benefits)/(# of employees) | SM9.1.1 Maintain employee labor costs factor less than or equal to end of FY96 levels. | |
| SM9.2 Health care factor = (Health care program costs)/(number of covered employees) | SM9.2.1 Achieve 15% decrease in health care factor in FY97 from the FY96 factor. | ||
| SM9.3 Retirees benefit factor = (retirees benefit costs)/(number of covered employees) | SM9.3.1 Achieve 5% decrease in retiree benefit costs factor FY97 from the FY96 factor. | ||
| SM9.4 Workforce planning factor = actual end of year work force profile by Common Occupational Classification System family (COCS) vs projected end-of-year work force profile by COCS family | SM9.4.1 Workforce profile accuracy of
greater than 90% by COCS family.
(not applicable in FY97) |
||
| SM9.5 Workforce placement factor =
(# internal hires)/(total # of hires) |
SM9.5.1 Fill 50% of posted/ advertised/ established vacancies through internal placement. | ||
| SM9.6 Labor relations assessment factor = (number of initiatives implemented through partnership with labor)/(total number of initiatives) | SM9.6.1 Implement 90% of labor/ management partnership initiatives agreed to by the parties during the year (period). | ||
| SM9.7 Cultural and work place effectiveness assessment results at the beginning and end of the rating period. | SM9.7.1 Conduct an initial human capital effectiveness assessment during the third quarter of FY97. | ||
| SM9.7.2 Develop/implement strategies and programs to address recommendations made in the baseline assessment. (SM9.7.1) | |||
| SM9.8 Completion of Affirmative Action Plan goals. | SM9.8.1 By the end of the FY 1997 (September 30, 1997), achieve 80% of the action oriented diversity commitments established in the Affirmative Action Plan (AAP). | ||
| SM9.8.2 Maintain beginning of FY 97 percent of protected classes (PC) within each EEO-1 categories 1 & 2 (Officials/Managers/and Professionals) by the end of FY 1997 (adjusted for voluntary separations). Also by September 30, 1997, implement procedures to manage PC representation the remaining non-bargaining unit EEO-1 categories (Technicians and Office/Clerical). | |||
| SM9.9 Timely EEO complaints processing. | SM9.9.1 Process 100% of EEO complaints within legally mandated time. | ||
| SM9.10 Reduce business & training travel cost. | SM9.10.1 Achieve a 15% reduction in
business & training travel cost over FY96
travel cost.
(not applicable in FY97) |
||
| SM10 LITIGATION MANAGEMENT. Manage litigation and the use of in-house and outside counsel to achieve cost-effective high-quality results. | SM10.1 Effective use made of in-house and outside counsel to achieve high-quality legal representation and results. | SM10.1.1 Develop and submit Litigation Management Plan for DOE-RL approval by October 1, 1996. | |
| SM10.1.2 Implement Litigation Management Plan (Procedures) within 15 days of DOE approval. | |||
| SM10.1.3 Provide FY97 litigation budget for all litigation by November 30, 1996. | |||
| SM10.1.4 Provide DOE with a litigation status and budget and status report within 10 days of the end of each quarter. | |||
| SM10.1.5 Submit reviewed and Contractor-approved outside counsel bills to DOE on a monthly basis. | |||
| SM10.1.6 Conduct analysis of litigation action and costs and lessons learned to determine how to better manage other/future cases. Provide analysis to DOE within 60 days after completion of each case. | |||
| SM11 TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT PROJECT. Demonstrate and implement innovative technologies to meet identified site needs and schedule commitments. Integrate technological advancements into baselines. Eliminate redundancies of technology efforts. | SM11.1 Technology needs related to the Hanford sitewide baseline. | SM11.1.1 Identify, prioritize, and submit to the Hanford Site Technology Coordination Group, technology needs related to the sitewide baseline, the site support baseline, and management processes, including the process for finding technologies to meet those needs, by September 30, 1997. | |
| SM11.1.2 Number of innovative technologies deployed that meet site needs. | |||
| SM11.2 Innovative technologies demonstrated to meet Site needs. | SM11.2.1 Number of innovative technologies demonstrations completed that meet identified site needs. | ||
| SM11.3 Amount of funds leveraged from the current baseline between the site programs and other technology programs or providers. | SM11.3.1 Percent increase in FY97 leveraged funds from the current baseline | ||
| SM12 INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION. Operate a centralized computer network and telephone service in a cost effective manner. | SM12.1 Information resource management planning. | SM12.1.1 Submit an Information Resource Management (IRM) Plan by March 31, 1997. | |
| SM12.2 Information Resource Management (IRM) Support Services | SM12.2.1 IRM support services are tied to mission requirements by September 30, 1997. | ||
| SM13 SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY. Manage, operate, and integrate activities in a cost-effective manner, based on risk assessments, to ensure adequate protection of site safeguards and security interests. | SM13.1 Nuclear Material Safeguards System (NMSS) in place. | SM13.1.1 Nuclear Material Safeguards System (NMSS) equipment installed, tested, training complete, and ready for beneficial use by May 31, 1997. | |
| SM13.2 Vulnerability Assessments (VAs) completed | SM13.2.1 Conduct VAs in a quality manner on schedule provided by DOE-RL. | ||
| SM13.3 Personnel Security actions completed | SM13.3.1 Provide clearance justification within 5 working days and terminations within 2 working days. | ||
| SM 14 SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY
(Deleted) |
SM14.1 (Deleted) | SM14.1.1 (Deleted) | |
| SM14.2 (Deleted) | SM14.2.1 (Deleted) | ||
| SM15 EXTERNAL/INTERNAL COMMUNICATIONS. Ensure that the full range of external and internal stakeholders and customers receive information in a timely, accurate, complete, and business-like manner. Provide appropriate opportunities for stakeholder and customer involvement in the Hanford decision-making process. Ensure that mandated requirements of the Freedom of Information Act, Privacy Act, and Federal Advisory Committee Act are met. | SM15.1 Integrated Hanford Communications and Public Involvement Plan, including providing support for the Indian Nations Program, and Congressional and Intergovernmental Relations. | SM15.1.1 Submit to DOE an Integrated Hanford Communications Plan incorporating external/internal communications activities, stakeholder involvement activities, and Intergovernmental liaison activities to the DOE Office of External Affairs, by March 31, 1997. | |
| SM16 TRAINING. Maintain a qualified and technically competent workforce. | SM16.1 Training and Qualification is implemented by a DOE-RL approved Site Qualification and Training Plan developed from Guidelines of the DOE STD Systematic Approach to Training and the DOE Implementation Plan for DNFSB Recommendation 93-3. | SM16.1.1 Submit a Site Qualification and Training Plan for DOE approval by December 1, 1996. | |
| SM16.2 Implementation Plan for DNFSB Recommendation 93-3 commitments completed as Training Implementation Plans. | SM16.2.1 All scheduled FY 97 commitments in the plan to be completed by September 30, 1997. | SM16.2.1.1*POSITIVE: All aspects of the plan defined above to be fully implemented by March 31, 1997: $25,000 | |
| SM16.3 Number of partnered college/ university courses developed and accredited. | SM16.3.1 Total PHMC cost for training will not exceed the FY96 Baseline. | ||
| SM16.4 Elimination of redundant training courses. | SM16.4.1 98% of all courses taught at the Hanford Site are nonredundant by September 30, 1997. | ||
| SM16.5 Course materials reflect incorporation of lessons learned from field activities. | SM16.5.1 Quarterly review samples of PHMC course materials show incorporation of appropriate lessons learned information from this and other field activities. PHMC is defined as Fluor Daniel Hanford, Babcok & Wilcox, Duke Engineering & Services Hanford, Lockheed Martin Hanford, Numatec Hanford, Rust Federal Services of Hanford, and DynCorp Hanford. | ||
| SM16.6 Percentage of automated training records integrated into the human resources "People Soft" System. | SM16.6.1 All PHMC training records of individuals are input and operational in "People-Soft" by September 30, 1997 PHMC is defined as Fluor Daniel Hanford, Babcok & Wilcox, Duke Engineering & Services Hanford, Lockheed Martin Hanford, Numatec Hanford, Rust Federal Services of Hanford, and DynCorp Hanford. | ||
| SM 17 TRAINING. Assess training needs and resources and provide DOE with a detailed strategy for coordinated market-driven training unit. | SM17.1 One point-of-contact to meet all training customer needs. | SM17.1.1 Provide a plan to eliminate redundant functions and evaluate consolidation of training under one organization by March 31, 1997. | |
| SM18 TRAINING. Operate and maintain the QTRC as a "market-driven" training resource. | SM18.1 Perception of training quality by customers. | SM18.1.1 Demonstrate customer perception of training quality through greater student/management satisfaction indicated by responses to course surveys in FY97 vs. FY96. | |
| SM18.2 Benchmarking studies conducted to assess training course cost, content, and quality. | SM18.2.1 Conduct benchmarking studies for five important courses as agreed upon by OTR. QTRC courses compare favorably with high-performance training benchmarks in the area of cost, content and quality. | ||
| SM18.3 QTRC becomes self supporting resource. | SM18.3.1 QTRC becomes a self-supporting resource in which costs are fully recovered. Rates will be competitive within the market place for internal Hanford customers as well as external customers. | ||
| SM19 TRAINING. Construct, support, and maintain the HAMMER Center in accordance with the HAMMER Mission and Business Plan. | SM19.1 Complete construction activities on the HAMMER Training Center project and begin operation of the new HAMMER Training Center | SM19.1.1 Complete construction activities on the HAMMER Training Center project by June 30, 1997. | |
| SM19.1.2 Assemble a highly qualified team to maintain the HAMMER Training Center and to provide operations and administrative support by June 30, 1997 for administration, operation and maintenance of the HAMMER Program and Training Center | |||
| SM19.1.3 Begin operation of the new HAMMER Training Center by September 30, 1997. | |||
| SM19.1.4 Establish and implement a
brokering process to utilize "best-in-class"
training providers on an
as-needed basis by June 1, 1997. |
|||
| SM19.1.5 Evaluate the use of an information management system based on PeopleSoft software, which integrates all HAMMER business management activities; e.g. financial, procurement, training scheduling, registration, records management, etc. | |||
| SM19.2 Provide support for the ongoing HAMMER Training and Program activities to assure smooth successful transition to the permanent HAMMER Training Center. | SM19.2.1 Support maintenance of the HAMMER National Partnership comprised of Labor, Fed/State/Local Governments, Tribal Leaders and Universities and Community Colleges (known and functioning as the HAMMER Steering Committee). | ||
| SM19.3 Implement a comprehensive HAMMER training evaluation program based on the Kirkpatrick Training Evaluation Model (Levels 1 through 4). | SM19.3.1 The evaluation program, Levels 1 through 3, will be completed. Level 4 will be designed by June 30, 1997 and be fully implemented by September 30, 1997. | ||
| SM19.4 Actively demonstrate steady progress toward creation and implementation of revenue flows (tuition, fees, grants) from HAMMER's Hanford and non-Hanford customers which offset operating costs . | SM19.4.1 In fiscal year 1998, revenues
offset operating costs.
(not applicable in FY97) |
||
| SM20 ECONOMIC TRANSITION AND OUTSOURCING. Manage and implement economic transition and outsourcing that contributes to economic stabilization of the Tri-Cities area. Incorporate potential investment of corporate resources into the plan. | SM20.1 Economic transition and outsourcing plan | SM20.1.1 Develop and implement an Economic Transition and Outsourcing Plan by December 1, 1996. | |
| SM21 Manage and implement potential investment of corporate resources into economic transition and outsourcing that contributes to economic stabilization and diversification of the Tri-Cities area. | SM21.1 * Development of jobs and
investment opportunities in the local
economy resulting from:
o Spin off companies o Asset conversion o Commercialized/acquired technologies o Hanford facilities utilization o Other Amount of corporate fund PHMC invest or attract to the local economy supporting new jobs and businesses. Development of an economic transition and outsourcing plan that will result in the creation of new jobs and business in the local economy. |
SM21.1.1 * Invest $3M (Contractor and Major Subcontractors) to bring new jobs to the Tri-Cities by September 30, 1997. | Note: Negative incentive associated with this expectation is: $150,000 |
| SM21.1.2. * Invest up to 12% of total fees earned through Project Hanford performance (here after referred to as total earned fee) to benefit the community by September 30, 1997. | Note: Negative incentive associated with this expectation is: $100,000 | ||
| SM21.1.3 * Establish a $10M investment fund agreement (between Contractor and Major Subcontractors) for potential use by Columbia Basin Ventures (CBV) to support economic development of the Tri-City Area by November 1, 1996. | Note: Negative incentive associated with this expectation is: $200,000 | ||
| SM21.1.4 * Outsource 2525 Project Hanford Staff on Day one (subject to DOE outsourcing approval). | |||
| SM21.1.5 * Provide funds from Project Hanford fees to help refurbish the WPPSS warehouse to house the Lockheed Martin-funded tank model in the Applied Process Engineering Laboratory by September 30, 1997. | Note: Negative incentive associated with this expectation is: $100,000 | ||
| SM21.1.6 * Help create 200 new private sector jobs by September 30, 1997. (FDH and Major Subcontractors commit to help attract or develop new businesses, independent of Project Hanford, that will generate 3,000 jobs by the end of the 5 year contract.) | Note: Negative incentive associated with this expectation is: $100,000 | ||
| SM21.1.7 * Of the total Project Hanford budget, 50% will be outsourced by 2001 to other than Major Subcontractors. (NA in FY97) | |||
| SM21.1.8 * Within 5 years, 60% of all outsourced Project Hanford dollars will be directed to local, regional, and Native American businesses. (NA in FY97) | |||
| SM21.1.9 * Transfer into FDNW non-current Hanford mission work equivalent to 50 new engineering and construction management professional positions by December 1, 1996 (subject to DOE outsourcing approval.) | Note: Negative incentive associated with this expectation is: $50,000 | ||
| SM21.1.10 * (Deleted) |
|||
| TANK WASTE REMEDIATION SYSTEM (SOW Section C.3.A) | |||
| TWR1 Resolve known tank safety issues.
Percent of fee pool = 5% |
TWR1.1 Close Secretarial Safety Initiatives | TWR1.1.1 Complete Secretarial Safety Initiatives by September 30, 1997 as referenced in the Secretarial Safety Initiatives, 1994. | |
| TWR1.2 Resolve Organic safety Issues | TWR1.2.1 Complete supporting technical document on the organic complexant and organic solvents safety issue by December 31, 1996. | ||
| TWR1.2.2 Safety Initiative (SI-2Tb) (Amended): Complete installation of continuous temperature monitoring system on remaining organic tanks by September 30, 1997. | |||
| TWR1.3 Resolve flammable gas issues | TWR1.3.1 Complete retained gas sampling in Tanks: 101-AW, 103-AN, 104-AN, 105-AN, and 101-A, and provide recommendation for future deployments, by January 31, 1997 (Revision 1; M013). | ||
| TWR1.3.2 Complete the Safety Controls
Optimization by Performance Evaluation
(SCOPE) expert elicitation workshops and
provide contractor approved expert
elicitation panel results for the Group 3
tanks.
Due August 4, 1997 |
|||
| TWR1.3.3 Complete and issue Safety Issue Resolution Strategy document by May 30, 1997. | |||
| TWR1.3.4 Complete and issue report on gas generation studies of single-shell tank waste by August 4, 1997. | |||
| TWR1.3.5 Complete installation of Standard Hydrogen Monitor Systems (SHMSs) on Additional Flammable Gas Tanks by September 30, 1997. | |||
| TWR1.3.6 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR1.3.7 Issue FY 1997 Annual Report on Vapor Space Monitoring of Flammable Gas Tanks by September 30, 1997. | |||
| TWR1.3.8 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR1.4 Resolve High Heat tank safety issue. | TWR1.4.1 (Deleted) | ||
| TWR2 Characterize Tank Waste
* Percent of Fee pool = 6% |
TWR2.1 Characterize tank waste to support storage and retrieval. | TWR2.1.1 (Deleted) | |
| TWR2.1.2 Issue 19 new tank characterization reports by September 30, 1997. | |||
| TWR3.* Be responsive to regulatory
documentation requirements.
Percent of fee pool = 2% |
TWR3.1.* Meet regulatory reporting requirements of tank characterization | TWR3.1.1 Update and reissue the 23 Tank Characterization Reports published in FY93 and FY94 by June 30, 1997. | |
| TWR3.1.2b Update and reissue the Data Quality Objective (DQOs) documents for Waste Compatibility by June 30, 1997. | |||
| TWR4 Operate tank farms in such a
manner as to ensure all activities
comply with requirements.
*Percent of Fee pool = 5% |
TWR4.1 Manage tank waste volume within the existing double-shell tank capacity. | TWR4.1.1 Stage waste to reduce waste volume by August 3, 1997 | |
| TWR4.1.1a Complete evaporator campaigns 97-1 and 97-2 with waste volume reductions as identified in Process Control Plans | |||
| TWR4.1.2 Update Final Safety Analysis Report for 242-A evaporator by March 31, 1997. | |||
| TWR4.1.3 Prepare and issue an Annual Operational Waste Volume Report by August 31, 1997. | |||
| TWR4.1.4 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR4.1.5 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR4.1.6 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR4.1.7 Replace the 242-A Steam-driven fan with an electric driven unit by January 15, 1997. | |||
| TWR5 Transiition Tank Farms to
controlled, clean, and stable condition.
*Percent of fee pool = 6% |
TWR5.1 Perform operations to assure transition to controlled clean and stable condition. | TWR5.1.1 Complete interim stabilization of an additional four tanks in the 200 West area by September 30, 1997. | |
| TWR 5.1.2 Initiate interim stabilization (salt-well pumping) on 2 tanks by March 31, 1997, and 6 additional tanks by September 30, 1997. (New TPA Milestones M-41-21 and M-41-22). | |||
| TWR5.1.3 Operate the mixer pump in Tank 101-SY to mitigate the flammable gas safety issue. | |||
| TWR5.1.4 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR5.1.5 Reduce the surface soil contamination by cleaning up an area of one million square feet by September 30, 1997. | |||
| TWR5.1.6 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR5.1.7 Maintain the capability to manage Double-Shell Tank space in West Tank Farm by ensuring at least one existing cross-site transfer system, from the 200 West Area to the 200 East Area, is leak tight (hydrostatically tested) through September 30, 1997. | |||
| TWR5.1.8 Support vadose zone characterization in S and SX tank farms by achieving the performance completion criteria by September 30, 1997. | |||
| TWR5.2 Complete design and construction activities required for transition to controlled, clean, and stable condition | TWR5.2.1
(Moved to 7.1.12) |
||
| TWR5.2.2 Complete tank farms ventilation upgrades Project W-030 and begin operation by December 31, 1996. | |||
| TWR5.2.3 Complete construction of the cross-site transfer system by August 31, 1997. | |||
| TWR6 Establish a comprehensive safety
management system which ensures there
is an adequate authorization basis.
* Percent of fee pool = 6% |
TWR6.1 Establish Authorization Basis for the Tank Farms. | TWR6.1.1 Complete transition from TWRS Interim Safety Basis (ISB) to TWRS Basis For Interim Operations (BIO) within 90 calendar days after PHMC receipt of DOE-RL approval of the TWRS BIO, associated Technical Safety Requirements (TSRs), and Flammable Gas Justification for Continued Operations (JCO), or within 60 calendar days after PHMC receipt of DOE-RL approval of the Engineering Change Notices (ECNs) for the BIO compensatory measures, whichever is later. | |
| TWR6.1.2 Submit TWRS Draft Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) and FSAR TSRs for the integrated Tier II review by November 15, 1996. | |||
| TWR6.1.3 Submit the TWRS Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) and TSR documents for RL approval by August 15, 1997. | |||
| TWR6.1.4 Deliver a draft plan to implement an Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) in response to DNFSB Recommendation 95-2 by March 17, 1997. Complete demonstration of the ISMS for two diverse projects by September 30, 1997. | |||
| TWR7 Complete actions to support Phase I privatization contractor(s). Percent of Fee pool = 2% | TWR7.1 Retrieve tank waste; prepare feed for Phase I privatization contractor(s) and receive immobilized waste and secondary waste for storage and disposal. | TWR7.1.1 Complete Initial Single-Shell Tank Retrieval System conceptual design by March 3, 1997 (reference TPA Milestone M-45-04A). | |
| TWR7.1.C Complete 101-AZ Mixer Pump Process Test and Evaluation by April 1, 1997. | |||
| TWR7.1.D Complete testing of an advanced design mixer pump by September 30, 1997. | |||
| TWR7.1.2 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR7.1.3 Provide documentation
specifying strategy and criteria for Leak
Detection, Monitoring and Mitigation
(LDMM) to support TPA Milestone
M-45-08-T02 by January 31, 1997. |
|||
| TWR7.1.4 Issue Request for Proposal (RFP) to industry for the retrieval of tank 241-C-106 heel for the Hanford Tanks Initiative (HTI) project. HTI will provide for the retrieval of waste using commercial retrieval technologies from tank 241-C-106 to meet M-45-03-T02. | |||
| TWR7.1.5 Complete Project W-211 Title II design for Tank 102-SY and preparations for Critical Decision 3 by March 31, 1997. | |||
| TWR7.1.6 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR7.1.7 Update Low-Level Waste and High-Level Waste feed staging plan by August 15, 1997. | |||
| TWR7.1.8 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR7.1.9 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR7.1.10 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR7.1.11 Submit to RL the Summary Report for TPA Milestone M-50-03-T2C on Enhanced Sludge Washing by September 12, 1997. | |||
| TWR7.1.12 Start definitive design for Project W-314 by January 31, 1997. | |||
| TWR7.1.P1 Issue immobilized low-activity waste interim storage facility 90% conceptual design for review by 9/30/97. | |||
| TWR7.1.P2 Complete by 9/30/97 the conceptual design of the Phase 1 IHLW interim storage facility to the extent needed for preparation of a cost estimate and BAIBO schedule. | |||
| TWR7.1.P3 Review and issue immobilized low-activity waste disposal interim performance assessment by 9/30/97. | |||
| TWR7.1.P4 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR8 Provide support to the privatized Phase I contractor(s). | TWR8.1 Comprehensive infrastructure support provided to the privatized Phase I contractor(s). | TWR8.1.1 Participate on the Integrated Process/Product teams to resolve issues with the privatized contractors as identified in the TWRS Privatization RFP (Reference RFP No. DE-RP06-96RL13308 and associated amendments) by September 30, 1997. | |
| TWR8.1.2 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR8.1.3 Complete and submit Letters of
instruction and/or Activity Planning forms for
High-Level Waste, Low-Level Waste and
Storage and Disposal (1230, 1240 and
1250) Projects' alternative path, core
competency and risk reduction activities by
45 calendar days after formal RL guidance
(Reference negotiated TPA Milestone
M-61). |
|||
| TWR8.1.4 Complete the Design Requirements Documents (DRDs), with exception of the tank and waste transfer upgrades and the Telecommunications DRD, for the Infrastructure projects required to support Phase I privatization by January 30, 1997; and complete conceptual design reports (see MDS T32-97-035, 040, 045 and 055). | |||
| TWR8.1.5 Update the TWRS process flowsheets by September 26, 1997. | |||
| FACILITIES STABILIZATION (SOW Section C.3.D) | |||
| FS1. Accelerate disposition of nuclear
materials, deactivate and transfer PUREX
facility to D&D, and reduce the mortgage
(out-year maintenance costs) for the
facility.
Percent of Fee Pool = 4% |
FS1.1 Deactivation and transfer of PUREX facility to D&D. | FS1.1.1 Complete PUREX deactivation by May 15, 1997. | |
| FS1.2 Out-year maintenance costs for PUREX. | FS1.2.1 Approved annual Surveillance and Maintenance baseline cost at project completion = $1.0M. | ||
| FS1.3 Cost of PUREX facility transfer. | FS1.3.1 Accomplish PUREX facility transfer to S&M at $23M | FS1.3.1 Positive: Deactivation costs
< $22M: $100,000 | |
| FS2 Complete the 300 Area Fuels Supply transition by March 31, 1998. | FS2.1 Complete the Waste Acid Treatment System (WATS) Closure Field Activities in the 313S Building. | FS2.1.1 Complete the Waste Acid Treatment (WATS) Closure Field Activities in the 313S Building by September 30, 1997. | |
| FS3. Manage the stabilization and disposition of nuclear material, fuel, hazardous materials, and deactivate the Fast Flux Facility (FFTF) and associated systems. | FS3.1 Complete Readiness Assessment for SSF operations only. | FS3.1.1 Complete Readiness Assessment for the SSF operations only by January 30, 1997. | |
| FS3.2
(Deleted) |
FS3.2.1
(Deleted) |
||
| FS3.3
(Deleted) |
FS3.3.1
(Deleted) |
||
| FS3.4 Drain sodium from 3718-M into railcars. | FS3.4.1 Drain sodium from 3718-M into railcars by September 5, 1997. | ||
| FS3.5 Minimize degradation of the In-Vessel Handling Machines (IVHMs), Instrument Trees (ITs) and Control Rod Drive Mechanisms (CRDMs) while in Standby. | FS3.5.1 Complete the mechanical checks of the In-Vessel Handling Machines (IVHMs), Instrument Trees (ITs) and Control Rod Drive Mechanisms (CRDMs) to obtain baseline data on operability in order to minimize degradation of these components while in Standby, by September 30, 1997. | ||
| FS4 Accelerate the reduction of the
B Plant mortgage (out-year maintenance
costs) and continue to safely store
approximately 73 million curies of
Cesium/Strontium in WESF
Percent of Fee Pool = 2% |
FS4.1 Construction of Project W-452.
Percent of fee pool = 0.5% |
FS4.1.1 Complete construction of Project W-452 by March 1, 1997 | |
| FS4.2 Start-up the Waste Encapsulation
and Storage Facility (WESF) Low-Level
Liquid Waste System.
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5% |
FS4.2.1 Accelerate WESF hot cell cleanup by removing a minimum of 14 drums of waste by August 30, 1997, in support of WESF Low-Level Liquid Waste System critical activities. | ||
| FS4.3 Start-up the Waste Encapsulation
and Storage Facility (WESF) Solid Waste
System.
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5% |
FS4.3.1 WESF Solid Waste System declared operational (and ready for use) by WESF Plant Operations Management by August 30, 1997. | ||
| FS4.4 Start-up the Waste Encapsulation
and Storage Facility (WESF) Liquid
Effluent System.
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5% |
FS4.4.1 WESF Liquid Effluent System declared operational (and ready for use) by WESF Plant Operations Management by August 30, 1997. | ||
| FS4.5 Remove organic solvent waste from
221-B Canyon.
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5% |
FS4.5.1 Complete removal of organic solvent waste from 221-B Canyon by February 28, 1997. | ||
| FS4.6 Implement B-Plant Interim Safety
Basis.
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5% |
FS4.6.1 Complete implementation of B Plant Interim Safety Basis by January 31, 1997. | ||
| FS5 Mitigate urgent risks; transition and
decommission facility maintain safe
storage of special nuclear material in PFP
plant.
* Percent of Fee Pool - 3% |
FS5.1 Accelerate stabilization of
plutonium metal buttons within the PFP
vaults.
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5% |
FS5.1.1 Complete oxidation stabilization of existing plutonium metal button (Pu) inventory within PFP vaults by May 1, 1997. | |
| FS5.2 Accelerate cementation of
plutonium residue material.
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5% |
FS5.2.1. Complete cementation of 1800 kilograms of bulk plutonium residue materials by September 30, 1997. | ||
| FS5.3 Complete construction of direct
denitration calciner (Project B-226).
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5% . |
FS5.3.1 Commence startup of solution stabilization at PFP by September 16, 1997 | ||
| FS5.4 Accelerate removal and cleanup of
exhaust system ducts..
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5% |
FS5.4.1 Complete duct segment #4 as defined in WHC-SD-CP-PMP-003 (dated March 17, 1989) by July 31, 1997. | ||
| FS5.4.2 Complete removal of approximately 80 feet (out of approximately 80 feet) of 232-Z Exhaust Ventilation Ducting in 291-Z. Complete by September 30, 1997. | |||
| FS5.4.3 Complete removal of
approximately 200 feet (out of
approximately 600 feet) of inactive
Process Vacuum System, Segment #5.
Complete by September 30, 1997. |
|||
| FS6 * Accelerate deactivation of PFP facilities to reduce mortgage. | FS6.1. * Accelerate deactivation and transfer facilities to D&D program. | FS6.1.1. * Submitplan for deactivation of PFP by July 31, 1997. | |
| FS7 * Safe storage and ultimate disposition of approximately 73 million curies cesium and strontium in WESF. | FS7.1 * Safe storage of Cs and Sr capsules. | FS7.1.1 * Operate WESF facility without storage or transportation violations. | |
| FS7.2
(Deleted) |
FS7.2.1 *
(Deleted) |
||
| FS8. Mitigate risks; transition and deactivate facility; maintain safe interim storage of nuclear material in the 324/327 facilities. | FS8.1 Remove fuel pins and pieces from
327 Building.
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5% |
FS8.1.1 The fuel pins and fuel pin pieces in 327 basin will be placed in casks and shipped to a TBD storage location by September 30, 1997. | |
| FS8.2 Continue removal of legacy wastes.
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5% |
FS8.2.1 Complete all activities to allow shipment of the FRG logs from 324 by August 30, 1997. | ||
| FS8.3 Develop an end point criteria
document for transition activities.
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5% |
FS8.3.1 Provide DOE-RL with a draft end point criteria document by March 31, 1997. | ||
| FS8.4 Develop a draft Project
Management Plan and integrated facility
schedule of transition activities.
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5% |
FS8.4.1 Provide DOE-RL with a draft Project Management Plan for transition activities and an integrated facility schedule with the cost estimate by July 31, 1997, for activities needed to transition the facility to ER. | ||
| FS8.5 Remove Cesium capsules from
327 Building.
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5 % |
FS8.5.1 Remove Cs capsules from 327 Building by September 30, 1997. | ||
