Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract
Download WordPerfect 5.1 Version
DE-AC06-96RL13200
Modification M026
Listed below is a summary of additions, changes, and deletions to Performance Objectives, Measures, Expectations and Incentives as a result of this contract modification. Refer to the following table for specific changes:
| SITE MANAGEMENT (SOW Section C.2) | |||
| OBJECTIVE | MEASURES | EXPECTATIONS | LEVEL |
| SM1.
Develop an integrated technical, schedule, and cost baseline for the
Hanford Site. (See SOW Section C.2.A)
Percent of fee pool = 5% |
SM1.1 Integrated technical basis, cost estimates, and schedules for work required to achieve Hanford strategies in a manner to enable timely acceptance, validation, and work authorization by DOE. | SM1.1.1 Integrated Site baseline with supporting work plans, including input of other prime contractors, submitted not later than July 31, 1997. | |
| SM2.
Provide a high level integrated sitewide systems engineering process and
products.
Percent of fee pool = 3% |
SM2.1 Maintain and improve an iterative process to ensure a consistent set of top- down integrated systems engineering documents. | SM2.1.1 Provide integrated Sitewide systems engineering database capabilities by July 31, 1997. | |
| SM2.1.2 A Systems Engineering Management Plan submitted to RL by Oct. 1, 1996. | |||
| SM2.1.3 Demonstration of systems engineering products with configuration management at the sitewide level by July 31, 1997. | SM2.1.3.1
Positive: By May 1, 1997
$100,000 |
||
| SM2.2 Improvement of sitewide systems engineering product quality and reliability. | SM2.2.1 A minimum of 90% of the sitewide systems engineering database is accurate; with inconsistencies, omissions, and errors identified and critical issues identified and being tracked in the sitewide systems engineering resolutions process by July 31, 1997. | SM2.2.1.1
Positive: 98% accuracy by July 1, 1997
$100,000 |
|
| SM2.3 Subcontractors apply systems engineering principles as appropriate for their scope of work with integration to the sitewide systems engineering program. | SM2.3.1 Demonstrate clear linkage of data integration for sitewide systems engineering database with configuration management from subcontractors to the PHMC and from the PHMC into subcontractor requirements and work plans by July 31, 1997. | SM2.3.1.1
Positive: by May 1, 1997
$100,000 |
|
| SM3
Integrated management systems maintain the Hanford Site managerially in
control. (See SOW Section C.2.B)
Percent of fee pool = 2% |
SM3.1 Manage and integrate Hanford Site activities in a timely manner. | SM3.1.1
Deliver a Management & Integration Plan for DOE by October 1, 1996,
except for the following sub- plan:
|
|
| SM3.2 Policies and procedures promote efficient and effective management of contract responsibilities. | SM3.2.1 Implement site planning and integration policies and procedures in accordance with the approved Management & Integration Plan by March 31, 1997. | ||
| SM3.3 Automated management information system(s) ensure accessible, timely, accurate, useful, and reliable technical, budget, schedule, financial, performance (all aspects including safety), baseline control information, while continuing to provide timely and accurate support to DOE decision-making process in the interim. | SM3.3.1 Management information system(s) provide accurate and timely decision-making capabilities to DOE. Successfully demonstrate system, including linkage capability to DOE-HQ reporting systems by July 31, 1997. | ||
| SM3.4 Benchmarking substantiates contractors' performance. | SM3.4.1 Benchmarking plan including appropriate cost and performance measures and ratios submitted by July 31, 1997, so that benchmarking substantiates high performance (by both PHMC and Major Subcontractors) against other private and public companies. | ||
| SM3.4.2. Benchmarking implemented within 30 days after DOE-RL approval. | |||
| SM3.6 Personnel assets closely aligned to needs dictated by authorized work scope. PHMC and Major Subcontractors staffed "for the valleys" with "peaks" handled by subcontract. | SM3.6.1
Submit preliminary, draft staffing forecast to DOE by November 1, 1996.
Submit draft staffing forecast to DOE by December 15, 1996. |
||
| SM3.6.2 Submit final staffing analysis to DOE by January 31, 1997. | |||
| SM4
Integrated financial systems maintain the Hanford site financially in
control.
Percent of fee pool = 2% |
SM4.1 Efficient, effective financial systems provide useful, accurate and timely financial information, compliant with rules and regulations such as DOE orders, Cost Accounting Standards, and generally accepted Accounting Standards. | SM4.1.1 Develop a successful cost reporting system capable of reporting by WBS, including both functional and programmatic areas by December 31, 1996. | |
| SM4.1.2 Contractor's financial systems successfully undergo a DOE-RL Office of Chief Financial Officer review and approval process with no material exceptions by July 31, 1997. | |||
| SM4.1.3 Invoices are generated from an accounting system approved by DOE-RL and are timely. | |||
| SM4.1.4 Monthly letter of credit reconciliation report of costs incurred and invoiced for the month (with draw downs or checks paid) is timely submitted. | |||
| SM4.1.5 Disclosure statement(s) reflecting actual practices and fully compliant with Cost Accounting Standards are submitted by October 1, 1996 and annually thereafter. | |||
| SM4.2 Administrative control of funds processes are implemented and uncosted balances are minimized. | SM4.2.1 Interim administrative control of funds system and procedures are in place and approved by RL by October 1, 1996. | ||
| SM4.2.2 All necessary personnel have been trained by December 1, 1996. | |||
| SM4.2.3 No funds ceilings are exceeded in FY 1997. | |||
| SM4.2.4 On September 30, 1997, uncosted balances meet the thresholds established in the DOE HQ’s CFO policy on carryover balances | |||
| SM4.3 An effective internal audit capability reviews contractor financial activities and those of its major subcontractors. | SM4.3.1. Successful implementation of the requirements of the Internal Audit Clause as required by DOE Acquisition Letter 90-3R. | ||
| SM4.4 Acceptable forward pricing rates allow for timely completion of the Activity Data Sheet budget formulation process. | SM4.4.1 Forward pricing rates must be received by RL by December 15, 1996, and annually thereafter. | ||
| SM4.5 Provide acceptable funding execution rates for timely completion of the Fiscal Year Work Plans. | SM4.5.1 Funding execution rates must be received by RL by June 15, 1997, and annually thereafter. | ||
| SM4.6F Implement recommended indirect reductions identified by analysis performed in FY96 or provide RL with acceptable justification for not implementing. | SM4.6.1 Successful completion will occur if by September 30, 1997, all reductions are either implemented or waived by RL, based on a justification from the contractor. | ||
| SM5
ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY AND HEALTH. Manage and integrate ESH&Q
across the Hanford site.
Percent of fee pool = 4% |
SM5.1 Develop and implement a DOE/RL approved ESH Management Plan, that includes implementation guidance for DNFSB Recommendation 95-2. | SM5.1.1 Submit plan to RL for approval by December 31, 1996. | |
| SM5.1.2 (Deleted) | |||
| SM5.2 Develop and implement a plan for conducting independent and self assessments. | SM5.2.1 Plan developed, submitted to RL-PAD and implemented by November 30, 1996. | ||
| SM5.3 Provide single point of contact interface(s) for DOE-RL for environmental and for safety and health matters. | SM5.3.1 Communications of environmental or safety and health direction and information between RL and contractor organizations passes through a single point of contact identified by October 1, 1996. | ||
| SM5.3.2 Contractor will provide a single point of contact for coordination & facilitation of all regulatory agency visits & inspections by October 1, 1996 | |||
| SM5.4 Develop performance indicators for ES&H and Quality Assurance. | SM5.4.1 Develop performance indicators for ES&H and quality assurance. Submit proposed safety & health and quality assurance performance indicators to RL for approval by December 1, 1996. Submit environmental performance indicators to RL for approval by August 1, 1997. | ||
| SM5.4.2 Implement safety and health and quality assurance indicators by January 1, 1997 and establish baseline. | |||
| SM5.5 Develop and implement a single, sitewide, consolidated, automated deficiency management tracking, trending, and reporting system as part of a site-wide management system. | SM5.5.1 Complete system development by July 31, 1997. | ||
| SM5.6 Prevent inadvertent use of counterfeit parts. | SM5.6.1 Processes and controls are in place to provide confidence that suspect/counterfeit items will not be installed into Project Hanford facilities under the FDH contract. | ||
| SM5.7
* Program developed for obtaining a VPP Star Status at Project Hanford.
Percent of fee pool = 1% |
SM5.7.1* By December 31, 1996, all Major Subcontractors submit strategic plans for obtaining VPP Star Status. | ||
| SM5.7.2 *One of the Major Subcontractors will submit application of VPP Star Status by September 30, 1998 with the one year required implementation beginning by September 30, 1997 (Not applicable in fiscal year 1997). | |||
| SM5.8 * Control chemical purchase and subsequent use to minimize hazardous waste generation. | SM5.8.1 * Evaluate existing chemical tracking database for completeness of hazardous chemicals by March 31, 1997. | ||
| SM5.8.2 *Evaluate and make recommendations for upgrading the chemical procurement system by September 30, 1997. | |||
| SM6
ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY, AND HEALTH. Achieve high performance in S&H
across the site.
Percent of fee pool = 2% |
SM6.1 Manage and integrate the site Emergency Preparedness program. | SM6.1.1 Implement the existing Site Emergency Response Organization Re- engineering Project Plan by July 1, 1997. | |
| SM6.2 Annually, prepare, conduct, and critique one tabletop exercise, one field full-participation exercise and one radiological assistance program (RAP) exercise. | SM6.2.1 Complete tabletop, field, and RAP exercises by September 30, 1997. | ||
| SM6.3 Manage fire protection programs to minimize the consequences of fire on the site. Develop plan to implement the fire department baseline needs assessment. | SM6.3.1 Submit implementation plan for DOE-RL approval by January 1, 1997. | ||
| SM6.4 Complete fire hazards analyses and fire protection shutdown plans. | SM6.4.1 By September 30, 1997, complete FHAs for existing nuclear facilities. | ||
| SM6.4.2 Complete Fire Protection Shutdown Plans for each facility to support scheduled shutdown of fire protection features. | |||
| SM6.5 Reduce site property fire loss rates. | SM6.5.1 FY-97 fire loss rates shall not exceed 80% of the RL 5 yr average fire property loss rate. | ||
| SM6.6 Continue implementation of the Occupational Health Process. | M6.6.1 Submit plan for transferring workplace hazard and worker-at-risk data from PHMC to the site occupational medical contractor (SOMC) for DOE-RL approval by December 31, 1996. | ||
| SM6.6.2 Complete implementation of the Occupational Health Process by June 30, 1997. | |||
| SM6.7 Develop coordinated business plan between the PHMC and the site occupational medical contractor. | SM6.7.1 Business plan approved by PHMC and SOMC by December 31, 1996. | ||
| SM6.8 Complete development and implement the Radiological Controls Improvement Program . | SM6.8.1 Submit Draft Radiological Controls Improvement Plan to RL, as a working document, by March 31, 1997. Develop and submit Final Radiological Improvement Plan to RL for approval by September 1, 1997, to address radiological control elements not included in the Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS). | ||
| SM6.8.2 Integrate the implementation schedule of the Radiological Control Improvement Plan with the Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) implementation plan and schedule. Program Improvements implemented in accordance with DOE approved schedule | |||
| SM6.9 * Reduce injury/illness rates sitewide. | SM6.9.1 * Reduce sitewide injury cost index to 8 or less during FY97. | ||
| SM6.10 * Reduce radiation exposures sitewide | SM6.10.1 * Reduce annual radiation exposure to workers by better than 25% of the FY96 level in FY97 (normalized for increased work in radiation areas). | ||
| SM7
ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY, AND HEALTH. Achieve high performance in
enviromental stewardship at Hanford Site.
Percent of fee pool = 2% |
SM7.1 Implementation of an Environmental Management System (EMS) consistent with the principles of ISO 14000. | SM7.1.1 The Contractor senior management will provide written commitments to conduct business in a manner consistent with ISO 14000 Environmental Management System concepts by October 1, 1996. | |
| SM7.1.2 Integrate Environmental Management System (EMS) elements into Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS), as appropriate, by July 1, 1997. Complete a crosswalk between ISMS and the desired Environmental Management System by August 31, 1997. This crosswalk is to be included as part of the ISMS. | |||
| SM7.1.3 Develop and submit by August 1, 1997, a schedule for implementing identified tasks based on the Environmental Management System Implementation Plan (input to the ISMS) and tailor to be consistent with the developing Integrated Safety Management System Plan (ISMS). | |||
| SM7.1.4
Compliance with EMS concepts will be demonstrated through the
Contractor's self-assessment program by January 1, 1998.
(Not applicable in fiscal year l997) |
|||
| SM7.2 Manage & integrate a technically competent, multi-media (with the exception of groundwater) ambient environmental monitoring program, in an efficient, cost effective manner. | SM7.2.1 Submit for RL approval a plan and recommendations for integration of required environmental monitoring by April 1, 1997. | ||
| SM7.3 Deliver to RL for timely submittal to the regulatory agencies, clearly written, complete reports meeting the requirements defined by the regulatory agencies or DOE-HQ. | SM7.3.1 At least 14 days before they are due to the regulatory agencies, the contractor will provide complete, final drafts of all routine or scheduled environmental reports required by regulatory agencies or DOE-HQ. | ||
| SM7.4 * Implement an effective environmental protection program that prevents occurrences. | SM7.4.1 * Establish an environmental occurrence reporting program. | ||
| SM8 KEY
MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL. Provide a stable management group.
* (Negative incentive only) |
SM8.1 Contractor and Major Subcontractor management key personnel remain in their proposed positions long enough to effect change to the Hanford way of doing business. | SM8.1.1 Individuals named as key management personnel in this contract (both Prime and Major Subcontractor) shall not be moved without DOE approval by the Contractor to another Contractor activity or position before September 30, 1997. | SM8.1.1.1. Negative: For each key management person who does not remain through September 30, 1997, the total fee earned will be reduced by $50,000 per person up to a maximum of $300,000. |
| SM9 HUMAN RESOURCES. Human Resources Programs provide a workplace environment conducive to employee well- being and growth; provide innovative compensation practices & personnel initiatives, aligned with the commercial marketplace; and attract and retain a diverse, well-trained work force capable of successfully executing Hanford’s mission. | SM9.1 Employee labor cost factor = (salary + benefits)/(# of employees) | SM9.1.1 Maintain employee labor costs factor less than or equal to end of FY96 levels. | |
| SM9.2 Health care factor = (Health care program costs)/(number of covered employees) | SM9.2.1 Achieve 15% decrease in health care factor in FY97 from the FY96 factor. | ||
| SM9.3 Retirees benefit factor = (retirees benefit costs)/(number of covered employees) | SM9.3.1 Achieve 5% decrease in retiree benefit costs factor FY97 from the FY96 factor. | ||
| SM9.4 Workforce planning factor = actual end of year work force profile by Common Occupational Classification System family (COCS) vs projected end-of-year work force profile by COCS family | SM9.4.1
Workforce profile accuracy of greater than 90% by COCS family.
(Not applicable in fiscal year 97) |
||
| SM9.5
Workforce placement factor =
(# internal hires)/(total # of hires) |
SM9.5.1 Fill 50% of posted/ advertised/ established vacancies through internal placement. | ||
| SM9.6 Labor relations assessment factor = (number of initiatives implemented through partnership with labor)/(total number of initiatives) | SM9.6.1 Implement 90% of labor/ management partnership initiatives agreed to by the parties during the year (period). | ||
| SM9.7 Cultural and work place effectiveness assessment results at the beginning and end of the rating period. | SM9.7.1 Conduct an initial human capital effectiveness assessment during the third quarter of FY97. | ||
| SM9.7.2 Develop/implement strategies and programs to address recommendations made in the baseline assessment. (SM9.7.1) | |||
| SM9.8 Completion of Affirmative Action Plan goals. | SM9.8.1 By the end of the FY 1997 (September 30, 1997), achieve 80% of the action oriented diversity commitments established in the Affirmative Action Plan (AAP). | ||
| SM9.8.2 Maintain beginning of FY 97 percent of protected classes (PC) within each EEO-1 categories 1 & 2 (Officials/Managers/and Professionals) by the end of FY 1997 (adjusted for voluntary separations). Also by September 30, 1997, implement procedures to manage PC representation the remaining non- bargaining unit EEO-1 categories (Technicians and Office/Clerical). | |||
| SM9.9 Timely EEO complaints processing. | SM9.9.1 Process 100% of EEO complaints within legally mandated time. | ||
| SM9.10 Reduce business & training travel cost. | SM9.10.1
Achieve a 15% reduction in business & training travel cost over FY96
travel cost.
(Not applicable in fiscal year 1997) |
||
| SM10 LITIGATION MANAGEMENT. Manage litigation and the use of in-house and outside counsel to achieve cost- effective high-quality results. | SM10.1 Effective use made of in-house and outside counsel to achieve high- quality legal representation and results. | SM10.1.1 Develop and submit Litigation Management Plan for DOE-RL approval by October 1, 1996. | |
| SM10.1.2 Implement Litigation Management Plan (Procedures) within 15 days of DOE approval. | |||
| SM10.1.3 Provide FY97 litigation budget for all litigation by November 30, 1996. | |||
| SM10.1.4 Provide DOE with a litigation status and budget and status report within 10 days of the end of each quarter. | |||
| SM10.1.5 Submit reviewed and Contractor-approved outside counsel bills to DOE on a monthly basis. | |||
| SM10.1.6 Conduct analysis of litigation action and costs and lessons learned to determine how to better manage other/future cases. Provide analysis to DOE within 60 days after completion of each case. | |||
| SM11 TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT PROJECT. Demonstrate and implement innovative technologies to meet identified site needs and schedule commitments. Integrate technological advancements into baselines. Eliminate redundancies of technology efforts. | SM11.1 Technology needs related to the Hanford sitewide baseline. | SM11.1.1 Identify, prioritize, and submit to the Hanford Site Technology Coordination Group, technology needs related to the sitewide baseline, the site support baseline, and management processes, including the process for finding technologies to meet those needs, by September 30, 1997. | |
| SM11.1.2 Number of innovative technologies deployed that meet site needs. | |||
| SM11.2 Innovative technologies demonstrated to meet Site needs. | SM11.2.1 Number of innovative technologies demonstrations completed that meet identified site needs. | ||
| SM11.3 Amount of funds leveraged from the current baseline between the site programs and other technology programs or providers. | SM11.3.1 Percent increase in FY97 leveraged funds from the current baseline | ||
| SM12 INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION. Operate a centralized computer network and telephone service in a cost effective manner. | SM12.1 Information resource management planning. | SM12.1.1 Submit an Information Resource Management (IRM) Plan by March 31, 1997. | |
| SM12.2 Information Resource Management (IRM) Support Services | SM12.2.1 IRM support services are tied to mission requirements by September 30, 1997. | ||
| SM13 SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY. Manage, operate, and integrate activities in a cost-effective manner, based on risk assessments, to ensure adequate protection of site safeguards and security interests. | SM13.1 Nuclear Material Safeguards System (NMSS) in place. | SM13.1.1 Nuclear Material Safeguards System (NMSS) equipment installed, tested, training complete, and ready for beneficial use by May 31, 1997. | |
| SM13.2 Vulnerability Assessments (VAs) completed | SM13.2.1 Conduct VAs in a quality manner on schedule provided by DOE-RL. | ||
| SM13.3 Personnel Security actions completed | SM13.3.1 Provide clearance justification within 5 working days and terminations within 2 working days. | ||
| SM
14 SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY
(Deleted) |
SM14.1 (Deleted) | SM14.1.1 (Deleted) | |
| SM14.2 (Deleted) | SM14.2.1 (Deleted) | ||
| SM15 EXTERNAL/INTERNAL COMMUNICATIONS. Ensure that the full range of external and internal stakeholders and customers receive information in a timely, accurate, complete, and business- like manner. Provide appropriate opportunities for stakeholder and customer involvement in the Hanford decision- making process. Ensure that mandated requirements of the Freedom of Information Act, Privacy Act, and Federal Advisory Committee Act are met. | SM15.1 Integrated Hanford Communications and Public Involvement Plan, including providing support for the Indian Nations Program, and Congressional and Intergovernmental Relations. | SM15.1.1 Submit to DOE an Integrated Hanford Communications Plan incorporating external/internal communications activities, stakeholder involvement activities, and Intergovernmental liaison activities to the DOE Office of External Affairs, by March 31, 1997. | |
| SM16 TRAINING. Maintain a qualified and technically competent workforce. | SM16.1 Training and Qualification is implemented by a DOE-RL approved Site Qualification and Training Plan developed from Guidelines of the DOE STD Systematic Approach to Training and the DOE Implementation Plan for DNFSB Recommendation 93-3. | SM16.1.1 Submit a Site Qualification and Training Plan for DOE approval by December 1, 1996. | |
| SM16.2 Implementation Plan for DNFSB Recommendation 93-3 commitments completed as Training Implementation Plans. | SM16.2.1 All scheduled FY 97 commitments in the plan to be completed by September 30, 1997. | SM16.2.1.1*POSITIVE: All aspects of the plan defined above to be fully implemented by March 31, 1997: $25,000 | |
| SM16.3 Number of partnered college/ university courses developed and accredited. | SM16.3.1 Total PHMC cost for training will not exceed the FY96 Baseline. | ||
| SM16.4 Elimination of redundant training courses. | SM16.4.1 98% of all courses taught at the Hanford Site are nonredundant by September 30, 1997. | ||
| SM16.5 Course materials reflect incorporation of lessons learned from field activities. | SM16.5.1 Quarterly review samples of PHMC course materials show incorporation of appropriate lessons learned information from this and other field activities. PHMC is defined as Fluor Daniel Hanford, Babcock & Wilcox, Duke Engineering & Services Hanford, Lockheed Martin Hanford, Numatec Hanford, Rust Federal Services of Hanford, and DynCorp Hanford. | ||
| SM16.6 Percentage of automated training records integrated into the human resources “People Soft” System. | SM16.6.1 All PHMC training records of individuals are input and operational in “People-Soft” by September 30, 1997 PHMC is defined as Fluor Daniel Hanford, Babcock & Wilcox, Duke Engineering & Services Hanford, Lockheed Martin Hanford, Numatec Hanford, Rust Federal Services of Hanford, and DynCorp Hanford. | ||
| SM 17 TRAINING. Assess training needs and resources and provide DOE with a detailed strategy for coordinated market- driven training unit. | SM17.1 One point-of-contact to meet all training customer needs. | SM17.1.1 Provide a plan to eliminate redundant functions and evaluate consolidation of training under one organization by March 31, 1997. | |
| SM18 TRAINING. Operate and maintain the QTRC as a “market-driven” training resource. | SM18.1 Perception of training quality by customers. | SM18.1.1 Demonstrate customer perception of training quality through greater student/management satisfaction indicated by responses to course surveys in FY97 vs. FY96. | |
| SM18.2 Benchmarking studies conducted to assess training course cost, content, and quality. | SM18.2.1 Conduct benchmarking studies for five important courses as agreed upon by OTR. QTRC courses compare favorably with high-performance training benchmarks in the area of cost, content and quality. | ||
| SM18.3 QTRC becomes self supporting resource. | SM18.3.1 QTRC becomes a self- supporting resource in which costs are fully recovered. Rates will be competitive within the market place for internal Hanford customers as well as external customers. | ||
| SM19 TRAINING. Construct, support, and maintain the HAMMER Center in accordance with the HAMMER Mission and Business Plan. | SM19.1 Complete construction activities on the HAMMER Training Center project and begin operation of the new HAMMER Training Center | SM19.1.1 Complete construction activities on the HAMMER Training Center project by June 30, 1997. | |
| SM19.1.2 Assemble a highly qualified team to maintain the HAMMER Training Center and to provide operations and administrative support by June 30, 1997 for administration, operation and maintenance of the HAMMER Program and Training Center | |||
| SM19.1.3 Begin operation of the new HAMMER Training Center by September 30, 1997. | |||
| SM19.1.4 Establish and implement a brokering process to utilize “best-in-class” training providers on an as-needed basis by June 1, 1997. | |||
| SM19.1.5 Evaluate the use of an information management system based on PeopleSoft software, which integrates all HAMMER business management activities; e.g. financial, procurement, training scheduling, registration, records management, etc. | |||
| SM19.2 Provide support for the ongoing HAMMER Training and Program activities to assure smooth successful transition to the permanent HAMMER Training Center. | SM19.2.1 Support maintenance of the HAMMER National Partnership comprised of Labor, Fed/State/Local Governments, Tribal Leaders and Universities and Community Colleges (known and functioning as the HAMMER Steering Committee). | ||
| SM19.3 Implement a comprehensive HAMMER training evaluation program based on the Kirkpatrick Training Evaluation Model (Levels 1 through 4). | SM19.3.1 The evaluation program, Levels 1 through 3, will be completed. Level 4 will be designed by June 30, 1997 and be fully implemented by September 30, 1997. | ||
| SM19.4 Actively demonstrate steady progress toward creation and implementation of revenue flows (tuition, fees, grants) from HAMMER's Hanford and non-Hanford customers which offset operating costs . | SM19.4.1 In
fiscal year 1998, revenues offset operating costs.
(Not applicable in fiscal year 1997) |
||
| SM20 ECONOMIC TRANSITION AND OUTSOURCING. Manage and implement economic transition and outsourcing that contributes to economic stabilization of the Tri-Cities area. Incorporate potential investment of corporate resources into the plan. | SM20.1 Economic transition and outsourcing plan | SM20.1.1 Develop and implement an Economic Transition and Outsourcing Plan by December 1, 1996. | |
| SM21 Manage and implement potential investment of corporate resources into economic transition and outsourcing that contributes to economic stabilization and diversification of the Tri-Cities area. | SM21.1
* Development of jobs and investment opportunities in the local economy
resulting from:
Amount of corporate fund PHMC invest or attract to the local economy supporting new jobs and businesses. Development of an economic transition and outsourcing plan that will result in the creation of new jobs and business in the local economy. |
SM21.1.1 * Invest $3M (Contractor and Major Subcontractors) to bring new jobs to the Tri-Cities by September 30, 1997. | Note: Negative incentive associated with this expectation is: $150,000 |
| SM21.1.2. * Invest up to 12% of total fees earned through Project Hanford performance (here after referred to as total earned fee) to benefit the community by September 30, 1997. | Note: Negative incentive associated with this expectation is: $100,000 | ||
| SM21.1.3 * Establish a $10M investment fund agreement (between Contractor and Major Subcontractors) for potential use by Columbia Basin Ventures (CBV) to support economic development of the Tri-City Area by November 1, 1996. | Note: Negative incentive associated with this expectation is: $200,000 | ||
| SM21.1.4 * Outsource 2525 Project Hanford Staff on Day one (subject to DOE outsourcing approval). | |||
| SM21.1.5 (Deleted). | Note: (Deleted) | ||
| SM21.1.6 * Help create 200 new private sector jobs by September 30, 1997. (FDH and Major Subcontractors commit to help attract or develop new businesses, independent of Project Hanford, that will generate 3,000 jobs by the end of the 5 year contract.) | Note: Negative incentive associated with this expectation is: $100,000 | ||
| SM21.1.7 * Of the total Project Hanford budget, 50% will be outsourced by 2001 to other than Major Subcontractors. (Not applicable in fiscal year 1997) | |||
| SM21.1.8 *
Within 5 years, 60% of all outsourced Project Hanford dollars will be
directed to local, regional, and Native American businesses.
(Not applicable in fiscal year 1997) |
|||
| SM21.1.9 * Transfer into FDNW non- current Hanford mission work equivalent to 50 new engineering and construction management professional positions by December 1, 1996 (subject to DOE outsourcing approval.) | Note: Negative incentive associated with this expectation is: $50,000 | ||
| SM21.1.10 * (Deleted) | |||
| TANK WASTE REMEDIATION SYSTEM (SOW Section C.3.A) | |||
| OBJECTIVE | MEASURE | EXPECTATION | LEVEL |
| TWR1
Resolve known tank safety issues.
Percent of fee pool = 5% |
TWR1.1 Close Secretarial Safety Initiatives | TWR1.1.1 Complete Secretarial Safety Initiatives by September 30, 1997 as referenced in the Secretarial Safety Initiatives, 1994. | |
| TWR1.2 Resolve Organic safety Issues | TWR1.2.1 Complete supporting technical document on the organic complexant and organic solvents safety issue by December 31, 1996. | ||
| TWR1.2.2 Safety Initiative (SI-2Tb) (Amended): Complete installation of continuous temperature monitoring system on remaining organic tanks by September 30, 1997. | |||
| TWR1.3 Resolve flammable gas issues | TWR1.3.1 Complete retained gas sampling in Tanks: 101-AW, 103-AN, 104- AN, 105-AN, and 101-A, and provide recommendation for future deployments, by January 31, 1997 (Revision 1; M013). | ||
| TWR1.3.2
Complete the Safety Controls Optimization by Performance Evaluation
(SCOPE) expert elicitation workshops and provide contractor approved
expert elicitation panel results for the Group 3 tanks.
Due August 4, 1997 |
|||
| TWR1.3.3 Complete and issue Safety Issue Resolution Strategy document by May 30, 1997. | |||
| TWR1.3.4 Complete and issue report on gas generation studies of single-shell tank waste by August 4, 1997. | |||
| TWR1.3.5 Complete installation of Standard Hydrogen Monitor Systems (SHMSs) on Additional Flammable Gas Tanks by September 30, 1997. | |||
| TWR1.3.6 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR1.3.7 Issue FY 1997 Annual Report on Vapor Space Monitoring of Flammable Gas Tanks by September 30, 1997. | |||
| TWR1.3.8 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR1.4 (Deleted) | TWR1.4.1 (Deleted) | ||
| TWR2
Characterize Tank Waste
* Percent of Fee pool = 6% |
TWR2.1 Characterize tank waste to support storage and retrieval. | TWR2.1.1 (Deleted) | |
| TWR2.1.2 Issue 16 new tank characterization reports by September 30, 1997. | |||
| TWR3.*
Be responsive to regulatory documentation requirements.
Percent of fee pool = 2% |
TWR3.1.* Meet regulatory reporting requirements of tank characterization | TWR3.1.1 Update and reissue the 23 Tank Characterization Reports published in FY93 and FY94 by June 30, 1997. | |
| TWR3.1.2b Update and reissue the Data Quality Objective (DQOs) documents for Waste Compatibility by June 30, 1997. | |||
| TWR4
Operate tank farms in such a manner as to ensure all activities comply
with requirements.
*Percent of Fee pool = 5% |
TWR4.1 Manage tank waste volume within the existing double-shell tank capacity. | TWR4.1.1 Stage waste to reduce waste volume by August 3, 1997 | |
| TWR4.1.1a Complete evaporator campaigns 97-1 and 97-2 with waste volume reductions as identified in Process Control Plans | |||
| TWR4.1.2 Update Final Safety Analysis Report for 242-A evaporator by March 31, 1997. | |||
| TWR4.1.3 Prepare and issue an Annual Operational Waste Volume Report by August 31, 1997. | |||
| TWR4.1.4 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR4.1.5 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR4.1.6 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR4.1.7 Replace the 242-A Steam- driven fan with an electric driven unit by January 15, 1997. | |||
| TWR5
Transiition Tank Farms to controlled, clean, and stable condition.
*Percent of fee pool = 6% |
TWR5.1 Perform operations to assure transition to controlled clean and stable condition. | TWR5.1.1 Complete interim stabilization of an additional four tanks in the 200 area by September 30, 1997. | |
| TWR 5.1.2 Initiate interim stabilization (salt-well pumping) on two tanks by May 31, 1997, and 2 additional tanks by September 30, 1997. | |||
| TWR5.1.3 Operate the mixer pump in Tank 101-SY to mitigate the flammable gas safety issue. | |||
| TWR5.1.4 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR5.1.5 Reduce the surface soil contamination by cleaning up an area of one million square feet by September 30, 1997. | |||
| TWR5.1.6 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR5.1.7 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR5.1.8 Support vadose zone characterization in S and SX tank farms by achieving the performance completion criteria by September 30, 1997. | |||
| TWR5.2 Complete design and construction activities required for transition to controlled, clean, and stable condition | TWR5.2.1 (Moved to 7.1.12) | ||
| TWR5.2.2 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR5.2.3 Complete construction of the cross-site transfer system by August 31, 1997. | |||
| TWR6
Establish a comprehensive safety management system which ensures there
is an adequate authorization basis.
* Percent of fee pool = 6% |
TWR6.1 Establish Authorization Basis for the Tank Farms. | TWR6.1.1 Complete transition from TWRS Interim Safety Basis (ISB) to TWRS Basis For Interim Operations (BIO) within 90 calendar days after PHMC receipt of DOE-RL approval of the TWRS BIO, associated Technical Safety Requirements (TSRs), and Flammable Gas Justification for Continued Operations (JCO), or within 60 calendar days after PHMC receipt of DOE-RL approval of the Engineering Change Notices (ECNs) for the BIO compensatory measures, whichever is later. | |
| TWR6.1.2 Submit TWRS Draft Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) and FSAR TSRs for the integrated Tier II review by November 15, 1996. | |||
| TWR6.1.3 Submit the TWRS Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) and TSR documents for RL approval by August 15, 1997. | |||
| TWR6.1.4 Deliver a draft plan to implement an Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) in response to DNFSB Recommendation 95-2 by March 17, 1997. Complete demonstration of the ISMS for two diverse projects by September 30, 1997. | |||
| TWR7
Complete actions to support Phase I privatization contractor(s).
Percent of Fee pool = 2% |
TWR7.1 Retrieve tank waste; prepare feed for Phase I privatization contractor(s) and receive immobilized waste and secondary waste for storage and disposal. | TWR7.1.1 Complete Initial Single-Shell Tank Retrieval System conceptual design by March 3, 1997 (reference TPA Milestone M-45-04A). | |
| TWR7.1.C Complete 101-AZ Mixer Pump Process Test and Evaluation by April 1, 1997. | |||
| TWR7.1.D (Deleted) | |||
| TWR7.1.2 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR7.1.3 Provide documentation specifying strategy and criteria for Leak Detection, Monitoring and Mitigation (LDMM) to support TPA Milestone M-45-08-T02 by January 31, 1997. | |||
| TWR7.1.4 Issue Request for Proposal (RFP) to industry for the retrieval of tank 241-C-106 heel for the Hanford Tanks Initiative (HTI) project. HTI will provide for the retrieval of waste using commercial retrieval technologies from tank 241-C-106 to meet M-45-03-T02. | |||
| TWR7.1.5 Complete Project W-211 Title II design for Tank 102-SY and preparations for Critical Decision 3 by March 31, 1997. | |||
| TWR7.1.6 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR7.1.7 Update Low-Level Waste and High-Level Waste feed staging plan by September 15, 1997. | |||
| TWR7.1.8 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR7.1.9 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR7.1.10 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR7.1.11 Submit to RL the Summary Report for TPA Milestone M-50-03-T2C on Enhanced Sludge Washing by September 12, 1997. | |||
| TWR7.1.12 Start definitive design for Project W-314 by January 31, 1997. | |||
| TWR7.1.P1 Issue immobilized low-activity waste interim storage facility 90% conceptual design for review by 9/30/97. | |||
| TWR7.1.P2 Complete by 9/30/97 the conceptual design of the Phase 1 IHLW interim storage facility to the extent needed for preparation of a cost estimate and BAIBO schedule. | |||
| TWR7.1.P3 Review and issue immobilized low-activity waste disposal interim performance assessment by 9/30/97. | |||
| TWR7.1.P4 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR8 Provide support to the privatized Phase I contractor(s). | TWR8.1 Comprehensive infrastructure support provided to the privatized Phase I contractor(s). | TWR8.1.1 Participate on the Integrated Process/Product teams to resolve issues with the privatized contractors as identified in the TWRS Privatization RFP (Reference RFP No. DE-RP06-96RL13308 and associated amendments) by September 30, 1997. | |
| TWR8.1.2 (Deleted) | |||
| TWR8.1.3 Complete and submit Letters of instruction and/or Activity Planning forms for High-Level Waste, Low-Level Waste and Storage and Disposal (1230, 1240 and 1250) Projects’ alternative path, core competency and risk reduction activities by 45 calendar days after formal RL guidance (Reference negotiated TPA Milestone M-61). | |||
| TWR8.1.4 Complete the Design Requirements Documents (DRDs), with exception of the tank and waste transfer upgrades and the Telecommunications DRD, for the Infrastructure projects required to support Phase I privatization by January 30, 1997; and complete conceptual design reports (see MDS T32- 97-035, 040, 045 and 055). | |||
| TWR8.1.5 Update the TWRS process flowsheets by September 26, 1997. | |||
| WASTE MANAGEMENT (SOW Section C.3.B) | |||
| OBJECTIVE | MEASURES | EXPECTATIONS | LEVEL |
| WM1
Receive, store, treat, and dispose of Solid Waste in a safe and
environmentally compliant manner such that capacity can always satisfy
demand, and disposal costs are reduced to a level at which they are
preferable to commercially available alternatives.
Percent of fee pool = 8% |
WM1.1 Conduct safe operations and maintenance of WRAP 1 Facility. | WM1.1.1 Initiate operations of Waste Receiving and Processing (WRAP) Module I by March 31, 1997. | |
| WM1.2 Initiate Project W-259 for 2706-T (providing double containment). | WM1.2.1 Initiate construction of Project W-259 2706-T secondary containment by January 30, 1997. | ||
| WM1.3 Site wide customer waste management needs analyzed, alternatives to reduce costs and improve performance considered and adopted where advantageous. | WM1.3.1 Develop and submit for DOE approval an integrated site-wide plan to provide waste management services, including waste processing, characterization, and verification based on design data from WRAP I, at a cost competitive with commercial costs by Sept. 30, 1997. | ||
| WM1.3.2. Quality performance standards for solid waste management based upon industry benchmarks are developed by contractor by Dec. 31, 1996 and submitted for negotiations with DOE. Waste management performance against these standards are measured quarterly and meet the negotiated performance levels. | WM1.3.2.1. POSITIVE: Waste management performance against these benchmarks are measured quarterly and exceed the negotiated performance levels by 10% or more. $25,000 | ||
| WM1.4 Process, package, and ship decontaminated materials to the Central Waste Complex (CWC), bury, or return to the customer high activity waste/contaminated equipment for storage, disposal, and/or reuse. | WM1.4.1 Provide subject services for less than $700.00 per cubic foot. | ||
| WM1.5 Process equipment and/or waste for reuse or disposal as offered by the generators. | WM1.5.1 The waste and/or contaminated equipment shall be processed at a cost less than $120.00 per cubic foot. | ||
| WM1.6 Maintain and accept waste into the low level burial grounds in accordance with: the authorization basis for the solid waste burial grounds, the Hanford Site Solid Waste Acceptance Criteria (HSWAC), the RCRA Permit Application and supplemental submittals, and 200 West Area and 200 East (when approved) Performance Assessments. | WM1.6.1 Assessments and audits show the Authorization Basis and Performance Assessments for the Low-Level Burial Grounds are being implemented and no significant violations have occurred. | ||
| WM1.6.2 Acceptance of waste meets the Hanford Site Solid Waste Acceptance Criteria as evidenced by audit and surveillance on waste acceptance implementation. | |||
| WM1.6.3 Operations, maintenance, and waste acceptance are consistent with RCRA interim status requirements (as implemented through WAC 173-303). Contractor will evaluate requirements of the LLBG permit application and supplemental submittals. | |||
| WM1.7 Identify technology needs for waste characterization, treatment, and disposal. | WM1.7.1 Prepare "Mixed Waste Technology Needs" report yearly to meet the budget cycle by January 31, 1997 and annually. | ||
| WM1.8 Establish a maintenance program for the 200 West/East Area Burial Grounds Performance Assessment in accordance with HQ issued guidance. | WM1.8.1 Implement a DOE-RL approved program plan and procedures to ensure that operations/waste acceptance are in compliance with the Performance Assessment (PA) by June 30, 1997 and PA is kept current thereafter. | ||
| WM2 Minimize the impact to the environment by ceasing unpermitted discharge to the soil column and by providing an infrastructure for treatment, storage and disposal of liquid effluents. | WM2.1 Disposal of all liquid effluents on the Hanford site considers the overall cost to the government of the method(s) of disposal balanced against the benefit(s) from an economic, health, safety, and environmental standpoint. | WM2.1.1 Submit for DOE approval a sitewide integrated decision-making process and procedures for disposal of liquid effluents on the Hanford Site by February 28, 1997. | |
| WM2.2 Compliance with DOE orders, and with federal, state and local requirements in the operation of the liquid effluent facilities, projects and operations. | WM2.2.1 Collect appropriate data and propose draft modifications to DOE for existing waste water discharge permits by March 31, 1997, based on above liquid effluent disposal process. | ||
| WM2.2.2 Submit ETF/LERF/242-A and 242-A Evaporator Part B permit applications to RL by June 15, 1997. | |||
| WM2.2.3 Complete WAC-216 permit application for Category 3 miscellaneous streams and submit to RL by August 30, 1997, or negotiate with Ecology to eliminate the need for a WAC-216 permit for Category 3 miscellaneous streams. | |||
| WM2.2.4 Operate 200 Area TEDF, 300 Area TEDF and ETF with no violations of waste discharge permit limits. | |||
| WM2.3 Consolidate handling and treatment of liquid effluents in the 200 Area. | WM2.3.1 Implement a coordinated management system to operate 242-A, LERF and ETF by September 30, 1997. | ||
| WM2.4 Complete the 200 Area Phase II Streams (Project W-252) modifications to the 200 Area facilities. | WM2.4.2 Complete construction of Phase II stream BAT/AKART implementation by June 30, 1997. | ||
| WM2.5 Implement 340 Waste Handling Facility Shutdown Plan. | WM2.5.1 Implement Waste Handling Facility Shutdown Plan at the 340 Waste Handling Facility by January 30, 1997. | ||
| WM2.6 Complete Biennial Evaluation of Tritium Treatment Technology and provide report as directed by TPA. | WM2.6.1 Submit tritium technology report to RL by July 31, 1997. | ||
| WM3
Manage and integrate the Hanford Analytical Services Program providing
analysis, field support, and process development services in support of
all programs/projects at Hanford.
Percent of fee pool = 4% |
WM3.1 Percent of Hanford Site’s analytical work done under Hanford Analytical Services program. | WM3.1.1 100 percent of Hanford Site’s analytical work is accounted for and integrated under Hanford Analytical Services Program by end of FY97. | |
| WM3.2 Complete the projected analytical/process development needs of Hanford. | WM3.2.1 Determine analytical/process development needs and report needs to DOE/RL by May 30, 1997. | ||
| WM3.3 Analytical Services work transition to centralized labs from decentralized labs (expressed as percent of number of decentralized labs). | WM3.3.1 Submit strategy for providing site-wide analytical needs and plan to transition on-site analytical services into 222-S, WSCF, or off-site contractors as applicable, and provide transition actions for one-third of decentralized analytical laboratories. | ||
| WM3.4 Reduction of costs of on-site analytical laboratory services compared to comparable commercial costs. | WM3.4.1 (Deleted) | WM3.4.1.1 (Deleted) | |
| WM3.4.2 Benchmark onsite analytical laboratory services to commercial lab costs before Sept. 30, 1997. | |||
| WM3.5 222S personnel radiation exposures. | WM3.5.1 Improve personnel contamination control by reducing contaminated areas in 222-S by 1,500 square feet in fiscal year 1997 and establishing a strategy to further reduce contaminated areas. | ||
| WM4
Manage and integrate a DOE approved pollution prevention and waste
minimization program.
Percent of fee pool = 1% |
WM4.1 Maintain a site pollution prevention program that complies with federal, state and DOE directives. | WM4.1.1 Implement pollution prevention/ waste minimization concepts into the design of all new projects and/or major modifications per DOE Order 5820.2a. | |
| WM4.1.2 Submit Hanford Site Waste Minimization and Pollution Prevention Awareness Program Plan as required by DOE Order 5400.1 by May 31, 1997. | |||
| WM4.2 Schedule and conduct pollution prevention opportunity assessments that crosscut the site to determine priority waste streams that can be reduced or eliminated. | WM4.2.1 Incorporate the pollution prevention opportunity assessment tracking and reporting system by September 30, 1997. | ||
| WM4.2.2 Provide a report on priority waste streams that can be reduced or eliminated by September 30, 1997 and annually thereafter. | |||
| WM4.3 Manage and track Pollution Prevention High Return on Investment Projects. | WM4.3.1 Identify and prioritize Pollution Prevention High-return-on-investment projects. | ||
| WM4.4 Track and report sitewide activities that reduce volume and/or toxicity of radioactive, mixed, hazardous, and sanitary waste types; and that promote recycling to reduce future risks and costs associated with managing wastes and pollutants. | WM4.4.1 Allocate goals to site waste generators by designated waste stream, to reduce volume, promote recycling, and meet the Secretary of Energy's Waste Minimization/Pollution Prevention (WM/PP) FY 1999 goals by February 28, 1997. | ||
| WM4.4.2 Submit the Annual Report on Waste Generation and Pollution Prevention Progress by September 30, 1997 or later as directed by DOE-HQ guidance. | |||
| WM4.4.3 Submit waste minimization certification and reporting as required by 40 CFR 313, Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (TPA), Executive Order 12873, and RL direction by June 15, 1997. | |||
| WM4.4.4 Meet the Secretarial FY99 WMin/pp goals by September 30, 1998, (one year early). (Not applicable in fiscal year 1997) | |||
| WM4.4.5 Meet all WMin/pp goals for FY97 established in WM4.4.1 above by September 30, 1997. | |||
| WM5 Manage the transportation, packaging, hazardous materials regulatory compliance, shipper training and traffic management activities in a safe, compliant, and cost-effective manner. | WM5.1 On-site Safety Analysis Reports for Packaging (SARPs) shall be reviewed. | WM5.1.1 Review of 20% of on-site SARPs in FY97, and update and revise, or cancel, so that 100% are reviewed by end of contract. | |
| WM5.2 Safe and compliant on-site/off- site transportation and packaging of all materials. | WM5.2.1 Violations, fines or penalties from federal or state organizations associated with transportation are less than or equal to 95% of FY96 case rates. | ||
| WM5.3 Perform with cost and schedule constraints as defined in negotiated work plans. | WM5.3.1 We will meet the commitment dates within budget for 90% of the work tasks having an approved work plan between Transportation & Packaging and the site customer. | ||
| SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL (SOW Section C.3.C) | |||
| OBJECTIVE | MEASURE | EXPECTATION | LEVEL |
| SNF1
Spent nuclear fuel removed from the K Basins by December 31, 1999.
Percent of fee pool = 3% |
SNF1.1
K-Basins Readiness
Percent of fee pool = 1% |
SNF1.1.1 Complete the Fuel Retrieval System KE facility modification design. Due Date: September 26, 1997 | |
| SNF1.1.2 Complete installation of the Cask/Transportation Pail Support Platform in K West by September 30, 1997. | |||
| SNF1.1.3 Initiate fuel removal from K Basin December 30, 1997. (Not applicable in fiscal year 1997) | |||
| SNF1.1.4 Complete the design of the Integrated Water Treatment System for K West by August 31, 1997. | |||
| SNF1.2 CSB
Readiness
Percent of fee pool = 1% |
SNF1.2.1 Complete Canister Storage Building construction by September 30, 1997. | ||
| SNF1.3
SNF Cask Readiness
Percent of fee pool = 1% |
SNF1.3.1 Complete transportation cask and transporter design by January 23, 1997. | ||
| SNF1.3.2 Complete design and procurement of the first shipment of MCOs by September 30, 1997. | |||
| SNF1.4 CVD
Readiness
Percent of fee pool = 1% |
SNF1.4.1 Complete physical construction of Cold Vacuum Drying Facility by September 30, 1997. | ||
| SNF2
SNF in interim long-term storage by June 30, 2000.
Percent of fee pool = 1% |
SNF2.1 HCS Readiness | SNF2.1.1 Complete Hot Conditioning System Definitive Design, including definition of process criteria, by September 30, 1997. | |
| SNF2.1.2 (Deleted) | |||
| SNF2.1.3 (Deleted) | |||
| SNF3.
* K-Basins cleaned and transferred to Transition Projects by October 31,
2000.
Percent of fee pool = 1% |
SNF3.1 * Percent completion | SNF3.1.1 * Obtain TWRS acceptance of K Basins sludge by September 30, 1997. | |
| SNF3.1.2 * Complete removal of KE empty canisters and clean South Loadout pit by September 30, 1997. | |||
| SNF4 Spent Nuclear fuels consolidated in the 200 Area in safe, stable, cost-effective interim storage pending national decision on their ultimate disposition. | SNF4.1 Percent Completion | SNF4.1.1 Project Management Plan for consolidation of other spent fuel submitted to DOE by September 30, 1997. | |
| SNF5
* Establish and mantain financial and managerial control of the SNF
project.
Percent of fee pool = 1% |
SNF5.1 * Project Management | SNF5.1.1 * Submit updated integrated, resource loaded SNF project schedule by December 31, 1996. | |
| SNF5.1.2 * Reduce the approved FY97 baseline to within the current FY97 funding of $175M. | |||
| SNF5.1.3 * (Deleted) | |||
| SNF6 Establish, maintain, and improve environment, health, and safety performance for SNF Project operations and facilities. | SNF6.1 Radiation Exposure/ALARA for exposure and contamination | SNF6.1.1 Radiation exposure performance will meet or exceed approved ALARA goals for SNF Project operation or facility. | |
| SNF6.1.2 SNF Project operations will be conducted and facilities will be operated using procedures and processes such that personnel contamination events/1,000 entries of radiation-work-permit work is ¤ 90% of the FY96 case rate. | |||
| SNF6.2 Authorization Basis/Unreviewed Safety Questions (USQ) | SNF6.2.1 No (zero) OSR/TSR violations will occur as a result of SNF Project operation conduct and facility operations. | ||
| SNF6.2.2 New operations/procedures and newly identified USQ issues will be appropriately addressed. | |||
| SNF6.3 Lost Workday and Recordable Cases | SNF6.3.1 Recordable case rate and lost workday case rates will not exceed FY96 accidents rates. | ||
| SNF6.4 Conduct of Operations | SNF6.4.1 SNF Project internal audit/ oversight of engineering, design, construction, and operation will demonstrate proper attention to good conduct of operations at all organizational levels by reduction in occurrence reports relating to procedural compliance and inadequate corrective action. | ||
| SNF6.5 Environmental Compliance | SNF6.5.1 SNF Project activities will operate with approved permits and within constraints of permitting process. | ||
| FACILITIES STABILIZATION (SOW Section C.3.D) | |||
| OBJECTIVE | MEASURE | EXPECTATION | LEVEL |
| FS1.
Accelerate disposition of nuclear materials, deactivate and transfer
PUREX facility to D&D, and reduce the mortgage (out-year maintenance
costs) for the facility.
Percent of Fee Pool = 4% |
FS1.1 Deactivation and transfer of PUREX facility to D&D. | FS1.1.1 Complete PUREX deactivation by May 15, 1997. | |
| FS1.2 Out-year maintenance costs for PUREX. | FS1.2.1 Approved annual Surveillance and Maintenance baseline cost at project completion = $1.0M. | ||
| FS1.3 Cost of PUREX facility transfer. | FS1.3.1 Accomplish PUREX facility transfer to S&M at $23M | FS1.3.1
Positive: Deactivation costs
¤$22M: $100,000 |
|
| FS2 Complete the 300 Area Fuels Supply transition by March 31, 1998. | FS2.1 Complete the Waste Acid Treatment System (WATS) Closure Field Activities in the 313S Building. | FS2.1.1 Complete the Waste Acid Treatment (WATS) Closure Field Activities in the 313S Building by September 30, 1997. | |
| FS3. Manage the stabilization and disposition of nuclear material, fuel, hazardous materials, and deactivate the Fast Flux Facility (FFTF) and associated systems. | FS3.1 Complete Readiness Assessment for SSF operations only. | FS3.1.1 Complete Readiness Assessment for the SSF operations only by January 30, 1997. | |
| FS3.2 (Deleted) | FS3.2.1 (Deleted) | ||
| FS3.3 (Deleted) | FS3.3.1 (Deleted) | ||
| FS3.4 Drain sodium from 3718-M into railcars. | FS3.4.1 Drain sodium from 3718-M into railcars by September 5, 1997. | ||
| FS3.5 Minimize degradation of the In- Vessel Handling Machines (IVHMs), Instrument Trees (ITs) and Control Rod Drive Mechanisms (CRDMs) while in Standby. | FS3.5.1 Complete the mechanical checks of the In-Vessel Handling Machines (IVHMs), Instrument Trees (ITs) and Control Rod Drive Mechanisms (CRDMs) to obtain baseline data on operability in order to minimize degradation of these components while in Standby, by September 30, 1997. | ||
| FS4
Accelerate the reduction of the B Plant mortgage (out-year maintenance
costs) and continue to safely store approximately 73 million curies of
Cesium/Strontium in WESF
Percent of Fee Pool = 2% |
FS4.1
Construction of Project W-452.
Percent of fee pool = 0.5% |
FS4.1.1 Complete construction of Project W-452 by March 1, 1997 | |
| FS4.2
Start-up the Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility (WESF) Low-Level
Liquid Waste System.
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5% |
FS4.2.1 Accelerate WESF hot cell cleanup by removing a minimum of 14 drums of waste by August 30, 1997, in support of WESF Low-Level Liquid Waste System critical activities. | ||
| FS4.3
Start-up the Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility (WESF) Solid Waste
System.
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5% |
FS4.3.1 WESF Solid Waste System declared operational (and ready for use) by WESF Plant Operations Management by August 30, 1997. | ||
| FS4.4
Start-up the Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility (WESF) Liquid
Effluent System.
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5% |
FS4.4.1 WESF Liquid Effluent System declared operational (and ready for use) by WESF Plant Operations Management by August 30, 1997. | ||
| FS4.5
Remove organic solvent waste from 221-B Canyon.
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5% |
FS4.5.1 Complete removal of organic solvent waste from 221-B Canyon by February 28, 1997. | ||
| FS4.6
Implement B-Plant Interim Safety Basis.
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5% |
FS4.6.1 Complete implementation of B Plant Interim Safety Basis by January 31, 1997. | ||
| FS5
Mitigate urgent risks; transition and decommission facility maintain
safe storage of special nuclear material in PFP plant.
Percent of Fee Pool = 2% |
FS5.1 (Deleted) | FS5.1.1 (Deleted) | |
| FS5.2
Accelerate cementation of plutonium residue material.
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5% For the 2% objective fee only, this Measure is considered met if 800 kg or greater is cemented on or before September 30, 1997. For each kg of Pu bulk residue cemented above 800 kgs, a fee of [0.5%/450] is earned up to a maximum of 1,250 kg. |
FS5.2.1. Complete cementation of 800 kg up to 1,250 kg bulk Pu residue materials by September 30, 1997. | ||
| FS5.3
Complete construction of direct denitration calciner (Project B-226).
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5% For the 2% objective fee, solution startup must occur on or before September 16, 1997. One hundred percent of the 0.5% is earned if FS5.3.1 is accomplished on or before June 30, 1997. Eighty percent of the 0.5% is earned if FS5.3.1 is accomplished between July 1, 1997 and July 20, 1997 (dates inclusive). Sixty percent of the 0.5% is earned if FS5.3.1 is accomplished between July 21, 1997 and August 8, 1997 (dates inclusive). Forty percent of the 0.5% is earned if FS5.3.1 is accomplished between August 9, 1997 and August 27, 1997 (dates inclusive). Twenty percent of the 0.5% is earned if FS5.3.1 is accomplished between August 28, 1997 and September 15, 1997 (dates inclusive). Zero percent of the 0.5% is earned if FS5.3.1 is accomplished on September 16, 1997 or later. |
FS5.3.1 Commence startup of solution stabilization at PFP by September 16, 1997 | ||
| FS5.4
Accelerate removal and cleanup of exhaust system ducts.
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.25% Completion of this Measure will not be an Objective fee requirement. |
FS5.4.1 Complete duct segment #4 as defined in WHC-SD-CP-PMP-003 (dated March 17, 1989) by September 30, 1997, excluding the vacuum header that services the solution stabilization program. | ||
| FS5.4.2 (Deleted) | |||
| FS5.4.3 (Deleted) | |||
| FS5.5 HF
duct removal.
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.25% |
FS5.5.1 Complete HF duct removal by September 30, 1997. | ||
| FS5.6
Improve Health & Safety Performance at PFP.
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.25% |
FS5.6.1 Improve the Health & Safety Performance at PFP during the period March 1, 1997 through September 30, 1997. | ||
| FS5.7
Demonstrate Cementation.
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5% |
FS5.7.1 Demonstrate a cementation rate of at least 150kg bulk Pu residue material per any four (4) consecutive weeks between the period 5/01/97 and 9/30/97. | ||
| FS5.8
Improve compliance to Operational Safety Requirements (OSRs).
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.25% |
FS5.8.1 Improve compliance to Operational Safety Requirements (OSRs) during the period March 1, 1997 to September 30, 1997. | ||
| FS5.9
Improve scheduled maintenance performance at PFP.
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5% |
FS5.9.1 Improve scheduled maintenance performance at PFP. | ||
| FS6 * Accelerate deactivation of PFP facilities to reduce mortgage. | FS6.1. * Accelerate deactivation and transfer facilities to D&D program. | FS6.1.1. * Submit plan for deactivation of PFP by July 31, 1997. | |
| FS7 * Safe storage and ultimate disposition of approximately 73 million curies cesium and strontium in WESF. | FS7.1 * Safe storage of Cs and Sr capsules. | FS7.1.1 * Operate WESF facility without storage or transportation violations. | |
| FS7.2 (Deleted) | FS7.2.1 * (Deleted) | ||
| FS8. Mitigate risks; transition and deactivate facility; maintain safe interim storage of nuclear material in the 324/327 facilities. | FS8.1 Remove fuel pins and pieces from 327 Building. Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5% | FS8.1.1 The fuel pins and fuel pin pieces in 327 basin will be placed in casks and shipped to a TBD storage location by September 30, 1997. | |
| FS8.2
Continue removal of legacy wastes.
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5% |
FS8.2.1 Complete all activities to allow shipment of the FRG logs from 324 by August 30, 1997. | ||
| FS8.3
Develop an end point criteria document for transition activities.
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5% |
FS8.3.1 Provide DOE-RL with a draft end point criteria document by March 31, 1997. | ||
| FS8.4 Develop a draft Project Management Plan and integrated facility schedule of transition activities. Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5% | FS8.4.1 Provide DOE-RL with a draft Project Management Plan for transition activities and an integrated facility schedule with the cost estimate by July 31, 1997, for activities needed to transition the facility to ER. | ||
| FS8.5
Remove Cesium capsules from 327 Building.
Percent of Fee Pool = 0.5 % |
FS8.5.1 Remove Cs capsules from 327 Building by September 30, 1997. | ||
| INFRASTRUCTURE (SOW Section C.4) | |||
| OBJECTIVE | MEASURE | EXPECTATION | LEVEL |
| IS1
Maximize efficiency and effectiveness of RL site infrastructure supplies
and services.
Percent of Fee Pool = 3% |
IS1.1 * Maintenance backlog. | IS1.1.1 * Develop metrics to evaluate and make recommendations to bring RL in line with commercial standards and practices in maintaining infrastructure facilities. | |
| IS1.2 * Material loss rate. | IS1.2.1 * Reduce the total line items in the financially and non-financially controlled inventories by 5% in FY 1997. | ||
| IS1.3. Total cost for Hanford Local Area Network (HLAN). | IS1.3.1 Develop and submit a benchmarking study by March 31, 1997. | ||
| IS1.4. Annual sitewide costs for maintenance, storage, and document control of all site records. | IS1.4.1 Meet performance and cost goals based on IRM metric benchmarking study | ||
| IS2
Optimize Cost of Infrastructure support and services.
Percent of fee pool = 6% |
IS2.1 Cost of employee occupancy pool | IS2.1.1 Cost of the occupancy pool reduced to 10% less than FY97 budget per SSPP/WBS 6.8. | |
| IS2.2 Optimize Cost of Infrastructure support and services. | IS2.2.1 Reduce DOE HO-coded inventory 10% by September 30, 1997. | IS2.2.1.1
Positive: > 15% - 25,000,
> 20% - 50,000 (total) |
|
| IS2.3 Cost, above power purchase cost, for delivery of electrical utility services sitewide, maintaining satisfactory level of system availability and reliability. | IS2.3.1 Reduce cost above purchased power cost for delivery of electrical utility service for transmission and distribution to £ $0.014/kilowatt hour. | ||
| IS2.4 Total price/gallon of potable water. | IS2.4.1. Total price/gallon for sitewide potable water £ $0.00623. | ||
| IS2.5. * Infrastructure Operations and Maintenance. | IS2.5.1. * Establish a baseline to evaluate and reduce DOE cost of maintaining general office space. | ||
| IS2.6 * Reduce inventory carrying costs. | IS2.6.1. * Reduce inventory management costs by 47% in FY97 compared to FY95 actual costs. | ||
| IS2.7.* Reduce per unit costs for calibration services. | IS2.7.1. * Reduce calibration lab cost by 38% from FY 1995 originated budget baseline. | ||
| IS3.*
Outsource infrastructure support services available for procurement.
Percent of fee pool = 1% |
IS3.1.* Outsource percentage | IS3.1.1. * Complete a Systems Functional Analysis addressing the seven major infrastructure support services, and an implementation plan/schedule for the optimization of such services, by March 28, 1997. | IS3.1.1.1.* A bonus of $50K applies if the deliverable is completed by January 6, 1997; a bonus of $30K applies if the deliverable is completed by February 3, 1997; a bonus of $20K applies if the deliverable is completed by March 3, 1997. |