To return to the document use the Browser's back arrow
| WASTE MANAGEMENT (SOW Section C.3.B) | |||
| OBJECTIVE | MEASURES | EXPECTATIONS | LEVEL |
| WM1 Receive, store, treat, and
dispose of Solid Waste in a safe and environmentally compliant manner such that
capacity can always satisfy demand, and disposal costs are reduced to a level at
which they are preferable to commercially available alternatives.
Percent of fee pool = 8% |
WM1.1 Conduct safe operations and maintenance of WRAP 1 Facility. | WM1.1.1 Initiate operations of Waste Receiving and Processing (WRAP) Module I by March 31, 1997. | |
| WM1.2 Initiate Project W-259 for 2706-T (providing double containment). | WM1.2.1 Initiate construction of Project W-259 2706-T secondary containment by January 30, 1997. | ||
| WM1.3 Site wide customer waste management needs analyzed, alternatives to reduce costs and improve performance considered and adopted where advantageous. | WM1.3.1 Develop and submit for DOE approval an integrated site-wide plan to provide waste management services, including waste processing, characterization, and verification based on design data from WRAP I, at a cost competitive with commercial costs by Sept. 30, 1997. | ||
| WM1.3.2.* Quality performance standards for solid waste management based upon industry benchmarks are developed by contractor by Dec. 31, 1996 and submitted for negotiations with DOE. Waste management performance against these standards are measured quarterly and meet the negotiated performance levels. | WM1.3.2.1.* POSITIVE: Waste management
performance against these benchmarks are measured quarterly and exceed the
negotiated performance levels by 10% or more.
$25,000 | ||
| WM1.4 Process, package, and ship decontaminated materials to the Central Waste Complex (CWC), bury, or return to the customer high activity waste/contaminated equipment for storage, disposal, and/or reuse. | WM1.4.1 Provide subject services for less than $700/cubic foot. | ||
| WM1.5 Process equipment and/or waste for reuse or disposal as offered by the generators. | WM1.5.1 The waste and/or contaminated equipment shall be processed at a cost less than $120 per cubic foot. | ||
| WM1.6 Maintain and accept waste into the low level burial grounds in accordance with: the authorization basis for the solid waste burial grounds, the Hanford Site Solid Waste Acceptance Criteria (HSWAC), the RCRA Permit Application and supplemental submittals, and 200 West Area and 200 East (when approved) Performance Assessments. | WM1.6.1 Assessments and audits show violations of authorization basis, Performance Assessments, or HSWAC are less than or equal to 95% of FY96 case rates for existing requirements. [Assessments and audits for new requirements during FY97 (particularly the performance assessment implementation) will be included in future year performance measures but not measured as part of the FY97 performance expectation.] | ||
| WM1.6.2 Acceptance of waste as described by the generator that does not meet the Hanford Site Solid Waste Acceptance Criteria is evidenced by audit and surveillance on waste acceptance implementation and is less than or equal to 95% of FY96 case rates. | |||
| WM1.6.3 Operations, maintenance, and waste acceptance are consistent with the LLBG RCRA permit application and supplemental submittals. Findings of noncompliance by DOE or Ecology on the operating record, operations, and procedures and are less than or equal to 95% of FY96 case rates.. | |||
| WM1.7 Identify technology needs for waste characterization, treatment, and disposal. | WM1.7.1 Prepare "Mixed Waste Technology Needs" report yearly to meet the budget cycle by January 31, 1997 and annually. | ||
| WM1.8 Establish a maintenance program for the 200 West/East Area Burial Grounds Performance Assessment in accordance with HQ issued guidance. | WM1.8.1 Implement a DOE-RL approved program plan and procedures to ensure that operations/waste acceptance are in compliance with the Performance Assessment (PA) by June 30, 1997 and PA is kept current thereafter. | ||
| OBJECTIVE | MEASURES | EXPECTATIONS | LEVEL |
| WM2 Minimize the impact to the environment by ceasing unpermitted discharge to the soil column and by providing an infrastructure for treatment, storage and disposal of liquid effluents. | WM2.1 Disposal of all liquid effluents on the Hanford site considers the overall cost to the government of the method(s) of disposal balanced against the benefit(s) from an economic, health, safety, and environmental standpoint. | WM2.1.1 Submit for DOE approval a sitewide integrated decision-making process and procedures for disposal of liquid effluents on the Hanford Site by February 28, 1997. | |
| WM2.2 Compliance with DOE orders, and with federal, state and local requirements in the operation of the liquid effluent facilities, projects and operations. | WM2.2.1 Collect appropriate data and propose draft modifications to DOE for existing waste water discharge permits by March 31, 1997, based on above liquid effluent disposal process. | ||
| WM2.2.2 Submit ETF/LERF/242-A Evaporator Part B permit application to RL by January 29, 1997. | |||
| WM2.2.3 Complete WAC-216 permit application for Category 3 miscellaneous streams and submit to RL by August 30, 1997. | |||
| WM2.2.4 Operate 200 Area TEDF, 300 Area TEDF and ETF with no violations of waste discharge permit limits. | |||
| WM2.3 Consolidate handling and treatment of liquid effluents in the 200 Area. | WM2.3.1 Implement a coordinated management system to operate 242-A, LERF and ETF by September 30, 1997. | ||
| WM2.4 Complete the 200 Area Phase II Streams (Project W-252) modifications to the 200 Area facilities. | WM2.4.1 Complete Phase II stream BAT/AKART implementation permit revision by January 30, 1997. | ||
| WM2.4.2 Complete construction of Phase II stream BAT/AKART implementation by June 30, 1997. | |||
| WM2.5 Implement 340 Waste Handling Facility Shutdown Plan. | WM2.5.1 Implement Waste Handling Facility Shutdown Plan at the 340 Waste Handling Facility by January 30, 1997. | ||
| WM2.6 Complete Biennial Evaluation of Tritium Treatment Technology and provide report as directed by TPA. | WM2.6.1 Submit tritium technology report to RL by July 31, 1997. | ||
| OBJECTIVE | MEASURES | EXPECTATIONS | LEVEL |
| WM3 Manage and integrate the Hanford
Analytical Services Program providing analysis, field support, and process
development services in support of all programs/projects at Hanford.
Percent of fee pool = 4% |
WM3.1 Percent of Hanford Site's analytical work done under Hanford Analytical Services program. | WM3.1.1 100 percent of Hanford Site's analytical work is accounted for and integrated under Hanford Analytical Services Program by end of FY97. | |
| WM3.2 Complete the projected analytical/process development needs of Hanford. | WM3.2.1 Determine analytical/Process development needs and Report needs to DOE/RL by March 1997. | ||
| WM3.3 Analytical Services work transition to centralized labs from decentralized labs (expressed as percent of number of decentralized labs). | WM3.3.1 Submit Strategy for providing site wide analytical needs and plan to consolidate on-site analytical services into 222-S, WSCF, or off-site contractors as applicable and close one-third of decentralized labs by end of FY97, and the remainder by the end of FY98. | ||
| WM3.3.2 Develop an MOU among PHMC, BHI, PNNL, and HEHF to ensure consistent QA and cost efficiency. | |||
| WM3.4 Reduction of costs of on-site analytical laboratory services compared to comparable commercial costs. | WM3.4.1 Reduce costs of on-site lab services to ten percent below FY96. | WM3.4.1.1 POSITIVE: Reduce costs of on-site lab
services to 20% below FY96.
$50,000 | |
| WM3.4.2 Benchmark onsite analytical laboratory services to commercial lab costs before Sept. 30, 1997. | |||
| WM3.5 222S personnel radiation exposures. | WM3.5.1 Achieve a 25% reduction of 222S personnel contaminations per analytical equivalent unit (AEU) over FY96 baseline rates normalized for FY97. | ||
| OBJECTIVE | MEASURES | EXPECTATIONS | LEVEL |
| WM4 Manage and integrate a DOE
approved pollution prevention and waste minimization program.
Percent of fee pool = 1% |
WM4.1 Maintain a site pollution prevention program that complies with federal, state and DOE directives. | WM4.1.1 Implement pollution prevention/ waste minimization concepts into the design of all new projects and/or major modifications per DOE Order 5820.2a by January 1, 1997. | |
| WM4.1.2 Submit Hanford Site Waste Minimization and Pollution Prevention Awareness Program Plan as required by DOE Order 5400.1 by March 31, 1997 | |||
| WM4.2 Schedule and conduct pollution prevention opportunity assessments that crosscut the site to determine priority waste streams that can be reduced or eliminated. | WM4.2.1 Incorporate the pollution prevention opportunity assessment tracking and reporting system by September 30, 1997. | ||
| WM4.2.2 Provide a report on priority waste streams that can be reduced or eliminated by September 30, 1997 and annually thereafter. | |||
| WM4.3 Manage and track Pollution Prevention High Return on Investment Projects. | WM4.3.1 Identify and prioritize Pollution Prevention High-return-on-investment projects by February 28, 1997. | ||
| WM4.4 Track and report sitewide activities that reduce volume and/or toxicity of radioactive, mixed, hazardous, and sanitary waste types; and that promote recycling to reduce future risks and costs associated with managing wastes and pollutants. | WM4.4.1 Site waste generators develop specific quantitative goals by designated waste stream, to reduce volume, promote recycling, and meet the Secretary of Energy's Waste Minimization/Pollution Prevention (WM/PP) FY 1999 goals by January 31, 1997. | ||
| WM4.4.2 Submit the Annual Report on Waste Generation and Pollution Prevention Progress by April 15, 1997. | |||
| WM4.4.3 Submit Waste Minimization Reporting and Certification as required under 40 CFR 262, 264, and 265 by April 15, 1997. | |||
| WM4.4.4 Meet the Secretarial FY99 WMin/pp goals
by September 30, 1998, (one year early).
(NOT APPLICABLE IN FY97) |
|||
| WM4.4.5 Meet all WMin/pp goals for FY97 established in WM4.4.1 above by September 30, 1997. | |||
| WM4.5* Reduce amount of waste generated on site. | WM4.5.1.* Reduce amount of waste going to tank
farms by 25% in FY98 as compared to FY97 (based on waste generating activities
in FY97). Implement new approaches by 10/1/97.
(Not applicable in FY98) |
||
| WM4.5.2 Reduce amount of waste planned to be sent to tank farms according to current outyear projections. Implement new approaches/plans by 10/1/97. | |||
| OBJECTIVE | MEASURES | EXPECTATIONS | LEVEL |
| WM5 Manage the transportation, packaging, hazardous materials regulatory compliance, shipper training and traffic management activities. | WM5.1 On-site Safety Analysis Reports for Packaging (SARPs) shall be reviewed. | WM5.1.1 Review of 20% of on-site SARPs in FY97 so that 100% are reviewed by end of contract. | |
| WM5.2 Safe and compliant on-site/off-site transportation and packaging of all materials. | WM5.2.1 Violations, fines or penalties from federal or state organizations associated with transportation are less than or equal to 95% of FY96 case rates. | ||
| WM5.2.2 Spills of radioactive material associated with on-site transportation are less than or equal to 95% of FY96 case rates. | |||
| OBJECTIVE | MEASURES | EXPECTATIONS | LEVEL |
| WM6 Implement an integrated, sitewide environmental monitoring program. | WM6.1 Environmental monitoring is performed under a single program and provided by a single contractor. | WM6.1.1 Provide an integrated sitewide environmental monitoring program plan to DOE-RL by 1/1/97. | |
| WM6.1.2 Environmental field services will be
provided on a fixed-unit-price basis to reduce program costs by 10% in FY98 over
FY97.
(Not applicable in FY98.) |
|||
To return to the document use the Browser's back arrow