![]() |
Hanford
Environmental Report |
| Dedicated to the Goal of 100% Environmental Compliance | |
Volume 20, Number 1 - January 9, 1998
EPA AMENDS STANDARDS FOR LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTION TREATMENT VARIANCES
On December 5, EPA published final rule amendments (62 FR 64504) to provisions on treatment variances under the Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR) treatment standards. These amendments clarify EPA's intent on treatment variances in the final LDR rule published in the Federal Register on May 12, 1997 (62 FR 26059) and include the following changes to:
clarify the circumstances whereby treatment variances may be approved because the applicable LDR standard is inappropriate. These include circumstances: where imposing the best demonstrated available technology (BDAT) is technically possible but unsuitable or impractical from a technical standpoint; or where imposing BDAT could result in a net environmental detriment by discouraging aggressive remediation.
add language that explicitly requires the decision-maker to determine that a revised treatment standard is sufficient to minimize threats to human health and the environment which are posed by land disposal of the waste.
The Federal Register publication also includes responses to comments on the previous final rule, withdrawal of the Citgo Petroleum variance, and information on state authorization of this amendment. The final rule revisions became effective December 5, 1997. For more information, email or call Wayne_E_Toebe@rl.gov of Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc. at (509) 372-2359.
EPA ISSUES AMENDMENTS TO THE FINAL SUBPART CC RULES
On December 8, EPA published amendments to the final RCRA Subpart CC rule, the Organic Air Emission Standards for Tanks, Surface Impoundments, and Containers. This rule is intended to reduce organic air emissions from certain hazardous waste management activities. EPA originally published the final rule in December 1994 (59 FR 62896), but has since made several revisions because of stakeholder concerns (see article in the EWR, Volume 18, Number 3). The amendments include changes to sections on:
Applicability and definitions. EPA has revised this section to clarify that having an implementation plan in place by December 8, 1997 can serve as compliance with subpart CC rules if the upgrades could not be installed or in operation by then or if modifications of production or treatment processes to satisfy exemption criteria were not completed. EPA is also clarifying that units that became subject to the subpart CC requirements after December 8, 1997, must comply with the rules immediately.
General. EPA has revised this section to: clarify that the subpart CC air rules apply only to units managing a hazardous waste; clarify exemptions for surface impoundments used for biological treatment of hazardous waste and for wastes meeting the LDR treatment standards for organic hazardous constituents; clarify the relationship of the LDR exemption and treatment variances under the LDR program; and amend the treatment demonstration provision for valuing waste analysis results below the limit of detection for an analytical method.
Waste Determination Procedures. EPA has revised this section to clarify: its intent regarding the number of samples required for a waste determination; language on the facility owner or operator use of test methods or waste knowledge; and provisions on the waste determination requirements for treated wastes. It has also added language on valuing non-detect analytical results.
Standards: Tanks. EPA has revised this section to clarify provisions on: closure devises for Level 1 tanks; the use of enclosed combustion devices as control devices on Level 2 tanks; enclosure doors and other openings not evaluated as natural draft openings when hazardous waste is managed inside the enclosure; exempting tanks, surface impoundments, or containers from subpart CC requirements when hazardous waste in the unit meets the LDR treatment standards.
Standards: Surface Impoundments. EPA is adding an exemption to the closed system transfer requirements for hazardous wastes transferred to a surface impoundments that meet the LDR treatment standards.
Standards: Containers. EPA is clarifying the language on: container inspection requirements; venting of containers for worker safety; the Department of Transportation compliance demonstration option for containers; and use of Method 21 monitoring for containers that are required to have Level 2 controls.
Standards: Closed-Vent Systems and Control Devices. EPA is clarifying language on inspection and monitoring procedures and requirements for management of spent carbon.
These amendments affect only those units at Hanford that contain or receive hazardous waste. The final rule also provides clarification to subparts AA and BB of the RCRA air rules. It became effective December 8, 1997. Fluor Daniel Hanford's Environmental Protection is currently determining how these amendments impact Hanford. For more information, email or call Wayne_E_Toebe@rl.gov of Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc. at (509) 372-2359.
UPDATE OF ECOLOGY DANGEROUS WASTE, AIR QUALITY, WATER QUALITY AND MTCA RULEMAKINGS
Ecology has made changes to the proposed rule based on public comment and will adopt the final amended rule on January 8, 1998. At the same time the rule is adopted, Ecology will release the responsiveness summary for both the DW rule amendments and the CTM. The final amended rule will be published in the WSR in late January 1998.
Also, as part of the triennial review process, Ecology will be clarifying the antidegradation policy implementation plan and changing the water quality standards to a use-based structure. Ecology is currently preparing draft antidegradation policy implementation plan procedures that will be available for public review and comment in early February 1998. Also, at this same time, Ecology is preparing white papers on temperature, bacteria, irrigation and domestic water supplies and clean sediments on the use-based structure which will be available for public review and comment in early February. Ecology intends to have two rounds of public workshops, one will be in late February 1998 and the other will be scheduled later in the year.
Pam Doctor and Ken Gano with Bechtel Hanford Inc. are members of the Ecological Risk Subcommittee and have been working with Ecology on concerns they have with the wildlife exposure model as proposed in the draft ecological-risk rule. As a result of these concerns, they have prepared a white paper, "Evaluation of the Washington State Department of Ecology's Wildlife Exposure Models for Hanford", which will be submitted to Ecology for its use in determining whether or not the proposed wildlife exposure model is appropriate for Hanford. This paper is currently being reviewed by BHI and DOE and will be submitted to Ecology soon.
For more information, email or call Marsha_A_Beery@rl.gov of Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc. Olympia Office at (360) 709-0664.
Ecology recently released the following documents:
|
|
| On December 30, 1997, the Department of Health released its Final Interim Regulatory Guidance for Radiological Cleanup at Hanford which replaces the draft interim guidance released March 1, 1996. This document provides guidance on how the DOH would implement a dose-based cleanup standard when Hanford is released for public use. For a copy, email or call Marsha_A_Beery@rl.gov of Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc. Olympia Office at (360) 709-0664. |
|
|||||||