![]() |
Hanford
Environmental Report |
| Dedicated to Environmental Compliance | |
Volume 25, Number 3 - March 14, 2003
DOE REVISES THE SCOPE OF THE HANFORD SITE SOLID WASTE PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
On February 12, 2003, the DOE published a notice (68 FR 7110) in the Federal Register announcing that DOE is revising the scope of the Hanford Site Solid Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement (Draft EIS). The Draft EIS was issued on May 24, 2002 (67 FR 36592) and DOE subsequently issued a Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare a separate EIS, The Tank Waste Remediation System Supplemental EIS for the Disposal of Immobilized Low-Activity Wastes from Hanford Tank Waste Processing. DOE now has decided to incorporate the scope of the Supplemental EIS into the scope of the Draft EIS. The revised Draft EIS will evaluate the potential environmental impacts of ongoing activities of the Hanford Site Solid Waste Program; disposal of immobilized low-activity waste from tank waste processing; and reasonably foreseeable treatment, storage, and disposal facilities and activities. Changes to the Draft EIS include the addition of the following:
The revised Draft EIS also will contain additional analyses of alternatives for managing waste generated both on the Hanford Site and waste received from offsite DOE generators that are consistent with decisions resulting from DOE's Final Waste Management Programmatic EIS for low-level waste and mixed waste. In addition, DOE recently issued a NOI to prepare a separate EIS for the treatment and disposal of tank waste and closure of single-shell tanks on the Hanford Site. In the EIS, DOE will evaluate alternative tank waste treatment processes for low activity waste and coordinate this evaluation with the Draft EIS. For more information, contact Wayne_E_Toebe@rl.gov at (509) 372-2359 with Fluor Hanford Compliance Services.
EPA ISSUES RCRA GUIDANCE
On February 25, 2003, EPA published a notice (68 FR 8757) in the Federal Register announcing that the EPA was issuing a final memorandum, "Guidance on Completion of Corrective Action Activities at RCRA Facilities," to regulators and the regulated community. The initial draft guidance was published in the Federal Register on October 2, 2001 (66 FR 50195), followed by publication of a second draft guidance (67 FR 9714) on February 27, 2002. The memorandum provides EPA Regions, States, Tribes, regulated community, members of the public, and other stakeholders with guidance on completion of corrective action activities at RCRA facilities. The guidance identifies two categories of completed RCRA corrective actions - "corrective action complete without controls" and "corrective action complete with controls." Sites are classified as "complete without controls" when all cleanup activities are done and the facility has met site-specific cleanup levels as required by RCRA. Sites are classified as "complete with controls" when the facility has been restored to some sort of industrial and residential use but there are restrictions such as institutional controls placed on the site to ensure protection of human health and the environment. For those sites that have some kind of restriction, the controls would be enforceable through permits, orders, or other mechanisms.
The final memorandum also provides guidance on when each type of completion determination is appropriate and when completion determinations are for less than an entire facility. Additionally, the memorandum provides guidance on procedures for EPA and authorized States when making completion determinations. EPA states in the memorandum that the EPA does not impose legally-binding requirements on EPA, States, or the regulated community and requirements may not apply to a particular situation based on the circumstances. The memorandum indicates that EPA and State decision makers retain discretion to adopt approaches where appropriate on a case-by-case basis that differ from the guidance. The memorandum also states that interested parties are free to raise questions and objections concerning the guidance and the appropriateness of the guidance to a particular situation. For more information, contact Wayne_E_Toebe@rl.gov at (509) 372-2359 with Fluor Hanford Compliance Services.
ECOLOGY ADOPTS FINAL SOLID WASTE HANDLING STANDARDS RULE
On February 5, 2003, Ecology published the final new Solid Waste Handling Standards rule (WSR 03-03-043), Chapter 173-350 WAC, in the Washington State Register. Ecology adopted the final rule on January 10, 2003, and the rule became effective on February 10, 2003. The rule is a new chapter that combines the Minimum Functional Standards for Solid Waste Handling rule, Chapter 173-304 WAC (adopted in 1985), the Mixed Municipal Solid Waste landfill requirements, Chapter 173-351 WAC, new legislation, improvements in solid waste handling technology since 1985, and outdated references in the existing rule into one rule. The new rule provides the following:
At the same time the rule was adopted, Ecology issued the Concise Explanatory Statement (CES) that provides Ecology's responses to public comments received. Both the rule and CES can be found on the Internet at http://www.ecy.gov, click on Solid Waste under Programs. For more information, contact Wayne_E_Toebe@rl.gov at (509) 372-2359 with Fluor Hanford Compliance Services.
On February 3, 2003, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) published a notice (68 FR 5492) in the Federal Register announcing that the OMB was soliciting comments on the draft report to Congress on the Costs and Benefits of Federal Regulations. The OMB is asking for input on how the OMB can improve the quality of their regulatory analysis and how agencies should balance health, safety, and environmental risks with economic growth and technological innovation. The OMB also is requesting comments on their draft guidance for the conduct of regulatory analyses that proposes that agencies perform both a cost-effectiveness analysis and a cost-benefit analysis. Congress requires OMB to prepare this report annually. Comments on the draft report must be received by the OMB on or before April 3, 2003.
On February 11, 2003, DOE published a notice (68 FR 6908) in the Federal Register announcing that the Secretary of the DOE transmitted a response on January 31, 2003 to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board's (DNFSB) Recommendation 2002-3 on the requirements for the design, implementation, and maintenance of administrative controls at DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities. The Secretary accepted the DNFSB recommendations and stated that DOE will develop an implementation plan to respond to these recommendations. Comments on the Secretary's response were to be received by DOE on or before March 3, 2003.
On February 13, 2003, EPA published a notice (68 FR 7373) in the Federal Register announcing that applicability determinations, alternative monitoring decisions, and regulatory interpretations that EPA made under the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), and the Stratospheric Ozone Protection Program (SOPP) are available on the Applicability Determination Index (ADI) Database System. The ADI is an electronic index on the Internet that contains EPA letters and memoranda regarding the applicability, monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements of the NSPS, NESHAP, and SOPP, which are posted quarterly on the ADI. In this action, EPA is posting 55 documents that were added to the ADI on December 20, 2002. The documents can be found on the Internet at http://www.epa.gov/compliance/assistance/applicability .
On February 19, 2003, the DOE published a notice (68 FR 7990) in the Federal Register announcing that DOE was adopting procedures and policies on small businesses, small government jurisdictions, and small organizations to ensure that the potential impacts of DOE draft rules were considered during rulemaking processes. The adoption of these procedures and policies responds to the President's Executive Order 13272 issued August 16, 2002, which calls on all agencies to establish procedures and policies to comply with provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. The procedures and policies can be found on the Internet at http://www.gc.doe.gov became effective February 19, 2003.
DOE recently announced plans to form a new office, the Office of Legacy Management, that would monitor and maintain post-cleanup activities at former nuclear weapons production sites. The new office would have responsibility for post-cleanup activities such as groundwater monitoring, records management, oversight of duties assigned to private contractors, and other postclosure responsibilities at the sites. President Bush has proposed $48 million in fiscal year 2004 funding to create this office.
On February 28, 2003, EPA published a notice (68 FR 9614) in the Federal Register announcing that the EPA was extending the comment period on the proposed rule amendments to the New Source Review program under Title 1, Parts C and D of the Clean Air Act (CAA) that were published (67 FR 80290) in the Federal Register on December 21, 2002. The comment period on the proposed rule amendments has been extended from March 3, 2003 to May 2, 2003. The proposed changes provide a future category of activities that would be considered to be routine maintenance, and repair and replacement under the NSR program. Comments on the proposed amendments must be received by EPA on or before May 2, 2003.
|
||||||