![]() |
Hanford
Environmental Report |
| Dedicated to Environmental Compliance | |
Volume 24, Number 10 - October 11, 2002
On September 9, 2002, EPA published a final rule (67 FR 57159) amending the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) that regulate radionuclide emissions other than radon-222 and radon-220 from DOE facilities and from Federal Facilities other than Nuclear Regulatory Commission licensees and those facilities not covered by Subpart H and Subpart I. The regulation requires that:
The ANSI N13.1-1999 will also apply to some existing sources where it can be cost-effectively applied; however, for sources that continue to use emissions sampling equipment meeting the ANSI 1969 standards, they will be subjected to more stringent annual inspection and cleaning requirements. The requirements of the final rule will become effective January 1, 2003. For more information, email or call John_A_Bates@rl.gov of Fluor Hanford's Compliance Services at (509) 376-2088.
On September 17, 2002, EPA published an interim final rule (67 FR 58529) to clarify the scope of the monitoring required in air operating permits (AOPs) under Title V of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The interim final rule clarifies that all AOPs must contain monitoring that is sufficient to assure compliance with the terms of the permit. EPA issued the interim final rule in response to claims of confusion by stakeholders over the scope of the Title V monitoring regulations. This confusion came about as a result of two court decisions. In a 1999 federal court decision [Appalachian Power Co. v. EPA, D.C. Cir., 208 F. 3rd 130 (1999)], the court upheld the EPA Title V monitoring requirements but dismissed agency guidance on periodic monitoring. In another decision [Natural Resources Defense Council v. EPA, 94F. 3d 130 (D.C. Cir., 1999)], the court ruled that EPA was correct in excluding some sources from Title V regulations on enhanced monitoring because these sources were covered under two other rules requiring periodic monitoring or monitoring sufficient to comply with the sources permit. The stakeholders assert that EPA cannot use the sufficiency language to require monitoring beyond what is required in the periodic monitoring regulations, even where periodic monitoring is not sufficient to ensure compliance.
The interim final rule codifies EPA's understanding that periodic monitoring [70.6(a)(3)(i)(B)] and sufficiency provisions [70.6(c)(1)] are separate regulatory standards. Section 70.6(a)(3)(i)(B) requires that " periodic monitoring be sufficient to yield reliable data from the relevant time period that are representative of the source's compliance with the permit." Section 70.6(c)(1) requires monitoring that is " sufficient to assure compliance with terms and conditions of the permit." Where there is no underlying monitoring of a "periodic" nature, 70.6(a)(3)(i)(B) applies. Where there is some underlying monitoring that could be considered periodic, 70.6(c)(1) applies.
The interim final rule became effective September 17, 2002, and will continue to be effective until November 18, 2002. In the same Federal Register, EPA has published a proposed rule (67 FR 58529) to make the interim final rule permanent. Comments on the proposed rule must be received by EPA on or before October 17, 2002. For more information, email or call William_E_Jr_Green@rl.gov at (509) 376-0583.
ECOLOGY RELEASES FINAL HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES REPORT
On September 25, 2002, Ecology released the final Hazardous Waste Management Facilities (HWMFs) Report, which identifies options and makes recommendations on how to resolve problems and reduce long-term liability at HWMFs plus move toward a more stable and healthy hazardous waste management system in Washington. This effort came about when the 2001 Legislature allocated funds to Ecology to do a study of hazardous waste management facilities in Washington and submit a report of their findings to them by September 30, 2002. In the report, Ecology identifies three options for the Legislature to consider including:
In the report, Ecology has recommended Option A as the preferred option to the Legislature. They feel that this option addresses the problems they've identified in the report in the quickest way and expect that implementation would occur by 2005. Ecology is now awaiting direction from the Legislature to determine its next steps. For a copy of the report or for more information, email or call Marsha_A_Beery@rl.gov at (360) 709-0664 with Fluor Hanford's Olympia Office.
On September 13, 2002, EPA published a notice (67 FR 58028) in the Federal Register announcing that applicability determinations, alternative monitoring decisions, and regulatory interpretations that EPA has made on the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), the NESHAPs and the Stratospheric Ozone Protection Program (SOPP) were available on the Applicability Determination Index (ADI) Database. The ADI is an electronic index on the Internet that contains EPA letters and memoranda regarding the applicability, monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements of the NSPS, NESHAP and SOPP, which are posted quarterly on the ADI. In this action, EPA is adding 55 documents to the ADI, which were issued between May 2002 and July 2002. The ADI can be found on the Internet at http://www.epa.gov/compliance/assistance/applicability.
On September 25, 2002, EPA published a notice (67 FR 60236) in the Federal Register announcing that it was soliciting public input on the Contact Information Data Standard (CIDS). This standard consists of a list of data elements to facilitate the sharing of information regarding contact name, address, and communication information. The draft standard was developed by Environmental Data Standards Council, which consisted of representatives from States, Tribes, and EPA. The draft CIDS consists of a list of data elements, definitions for these elements, notes, explanatory preamble language, and a set of frequently asked questions. Comments on the draft CIDS must be received by EPA on or before November 12, 2002.
On September 30, 2002, EPA published a notice (67 FR 61337) in the Federal Register announcing that an Information Collection Request (ICR) on the RCRA Hazardous Waste Permit Application and Modification, Part A, has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. Section 3005 of Subtitle C of RCRA requires that any person who generates or transports regulated waste or who owns or operates a treatment, storage, or disposal facility (TSDF) of regulated waste must obtain a permit. To obtain the permit, the TSDF must submit an application, which has two parts, Part A and Part B. The ICR is due to expire on October 31, 2002. EPA is therefore seeking OMB's review and approval to continue collection of this information. Comments on the ICR must be received by EPA on or before October 30, 2002.
Ecology recently issued the Eastern Washington Stormwater Management (EWSM) newsletter, which can be found on the Internet at http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/stormwater, click on EWSM News. Ecology is currently developing an EWS manual that will be used by stakeholders for constructing and operating their stormwater systems. The newsletter includes information on: (1) the EWSM manual public workshops scheduled for October 2002; (2) draft model municipal stormwater program recommendations; (3) a draft EWS manual; (4) how to obtain the draft documents which are also provided at the link above; (5) the public comment period and how to provide comments on the draft documents and recommendations; and (6) how the 2000 Census date will be used to identify the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Phase II regulated communities.
|
||||||